×

A modified Newton-type Koiter-Newton method for tracing the geometrically nonlinear response of structures. (English) Zbl 07867280

Summary: The Koiter-Newton (KN) method is a combination of local multimode polynomial approximations inspired by Koiter’s initial postbuckling theory and global corrections using the standard Newton method. In the original formulation, the local polynomial approximation, called a reduced-order model, is used to make significantly more accurate predictions compared to the standard linear prediction used in conjunction with Newton method. The correction to the exact equilibrium path relied exclusively on Newton-Raphson method using the full model.
In this paper, we proposed a modified Newton-type KN method to trace the geometrically nonlinear response of structures. The developed predictor-corrector strategy is applied to each predicted solution of the reduced-order model. The reduced-order model can be used also in the correction phase, and the exact full nonlinear model is applied only to calculate force residuals. Remainder terms in both the displacement expansion and the reduced-order model are well considered and constantly updated during correction. The same augmented finite element model system is used for both the construction of the reduced-order model and the iterations for correction. Hence, the developed method can be seen as a particular modified Newton method with a constant iteration matrix over the single KN step. This significantly reduces the computational cost of the method. As a side product, the method has better error control, leading to more robust step size adaptation strategies. Numerical results demonstrate the effectiveness of the method in treating nonlinear buckling problems.
{Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.}

MSC:

74Sxx Numerical and other methods in solid mechanics
74Gxx Equilibrium (steady-state) problems in solid mechanics
74Kxx Thin bodies, structures
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] SzeKY, LiuXH, LoSH. Popular benchmark problems for geometric nonlinear analysis of shells. Finite Elem Anal Des. 2004;40(11):1551‐1569.
[2] WangS, HarveyCM, WangB, WatsonA. Post‐local buckling‐driven delamination in bilayer composite beams. Compos Struct. 2015;133:1058‐1066.
[3] OvesyHR, MooneghiMA, KharaziM. Post‐buckling analysis of delaminated composite laminates with multiple through‐the‐width delaminations using a novel layerwise theory. Thin Wall Struct. 2015;94:98‐106.
[4] RahmanT, JansenEL. Finite element based coupled mode initial post‐buckling analysis of a composite cylindrical shell. Thin Wall Struct. 2010;48(1):25‐32.
[5] ZhouY, StanciulescuI, EasonT, SpottswoodM. Nonlinear elastic buckling and postbuckling analysis of cylindrical panels. Finite Elem Anal Des. 2015;96:41‐50.
[6] CrisfieldMA. An arc‐length method including line search and acceleration. Int J Numer Meth Eng. 1983;19(9):1269‐1289. · Zbl 0516.73084
[7] CrisfieldMA. A fast incremental/iterative solution procedure that handles snap‐through. Comput Struct. 1981;13(81):55‐62. · Zbl 0479.73031
[8] FordeBWR, StiemerSF. Improved arc‐length orthogonality methods for nonlinear finite element analysis. Comput Struct. 1987;27(5):625‐630. · Zbl 0623.73079
[9] RagonSA, GürdalZ, WatsonLT. A comparison of three algorithms for tracing nonlinear equilibrium paths of structural systems. Int J Solids Struct. 2002;139:689‐698. · Zbl 1011.74043
[10] NajahA, CochelinB, DamilN, Potier‐FerryM. A critical review of asymptotic numerical methods. Arch Comput Methods Eng. 1998;5(1):31‐50.
[11] NagyDA, KonigM. Geometrically nonlinear finite element behaviour using buckling mode superposition. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 1979;19(3):447‐484. · Zbl 0421.73077
[12] AlmrothBO, SternP, BroganFA. Automatic choice of global shape functions in structural analysis. AIAA Journal. 1978;16(5):525‐528.
[13] NoorAK, PetersJM. Reduced basis technique for nonlinear analysis of structures. AIAA Journal. 1980;18(4):455‐462.
[14] LanzoAD, GarceaG. Koiter’s analysis of thin‐walled structures by a finite element approach. Int J Numer Meth Eng. 1996;39:3007‐3031. · Zbl 0886.73066
[15] CarnoyEG. Asymptotic study of the elastic postbuckling behavior of structures by the finite element method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 1981;29:147‐173. · Zbl 0466.73042
[16] GarceaG, MadeoA, ZagariG, CasciaroR. Asymptotic postbuckling FEM analysis using corotational formulation. Int J Solids Struct. 2009;46:377‐397. · Zbl 1168.74350
[17] ShawSW, PierreC. Normal modes for non‐linear vibratory systems. J Sound Vib. 1993;164(1):85‐124. · Zbl 0925.70235
[18] LazarusA, ThomasO, DeüJ‐F. Finite element reduced order models for nonlinear vibrations of piezoelectric layered beams with applications to nems. Finite Elem Anal Des. 2012;49(1):35‐51.
[19] JansenEL, RolfesR. Non‐linear free vibration analysis of laminated cylindrical shells under static axial loading including accurate satisfaction of boundary conditions. Int J Non Linear Mech. 2014;66:66‐74.
[20] TisoP. Finite element based reduction methods for static and dynamic analysis of thin‐walled structures. Ph.D. Thesis: Delft University of Technology; 2006.
[21] RahmanT, JansenEL, GürdalZ. Dynamic buckling analysis of composite cylindrical shells using a finite element based perturbation method. Nonlinear Dyn. 2011;66(3):389‐401.
[22] AzamSE, MarianiS. Investigation of computational and accuracy issues in pod‐based reduced order modeling of dynamic structural systems. Eng Struct. 2013;54:150‐167.
[23] AmsallemD, CarlbergK, CortialJ, FarhatC. A method for interpolating on manifolds structural dynamics reduced‐order models. Int J Numer Meth Eng. 2009;80:1241‐1258. · Zbl 1176.74077
[24] AkkariN, HamdouniA, LibergeE, JazarM. A mathematical and numerical study of the sensitivity of a reduced order model by pod (romcpod), for a 2d incompressible fluid flow. J Comput Appl Math. 2014;270:522‐530. · Zbl 1321.76044
[25] AmmarA, RyckelynckD, ChinestaF, KeuningsR. On the reduction of kinetic theory models related to finitely extensible dumbbells. J NonNewton Fluid Mech. 2006;134:136‐147. · Zbl 1123.76309
[26] AmmarA, PruliereE, ChinestaF, LasoM. Reduced numerical modeling of flows involving liquid‐crystalline polymeres. J NonNewton Fluid Mech. 2009;160:140‐156. · Zbl 1274.76145
[27] RowleyCW. Model reduction for fluids, using balanced proper orthogonal decomposition. Int J Bifurc Chaos. 2005;15(3):997‐1013. · Zbl 1140.76443
[28] WintherBA, GogginPJ, DykmanJR. Reduced‐order dynamic aeroelastic model development and integration with nonlinear simulation. J Aircraft. 2000;37(5):833‐839.
[29] ZhangW, WangB, YeZ. High efficient numerical method for limit cycle flutter analysis based on nonlinear aerodynamic reduced order model. In: 51st AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, And Materials Conference. Orlando, Florida; 12‐15 April; 2010:1‐15.
[30] YueY. The use of model order reduction in design optimization algorithms. Ph.D. Thesis: KU Leuven; 2012.
[31] Bui‐ThanhT, WillcoxK, GhattasO, van Bloemen WaandersB. Goal‐oriented, model‐constrained optimization for reduction of large‐scale systems. J Comput Phys. 2007;224(2):880‐896. · Zbl 1123.65081
[32] MottaquiH, BraikatB, DamilN. Discussion about parameterization in the asymptotic numerical method: application to nonlinear elastic shells. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2010;199:1701‐1709. · Zbl 1231.74134
[33] CochelinB, DamilN, Potier‐FerryM. Asymptotic‐numerical methods and Padé approximants for nonlinear elastic structures. Int J Numer Meth Eng. 1994;37(7):1187‐1213. · Zbl 0805.73076
[34] BoutyourEH, ZahrouniH, Potier‐FerryM, BoudiM. Asymptotic‐numerical method for buckling analysis of shell structures with large rotations. J Comput Appl Math. 2004;168(1‐2):77‐85. · Zbl 1051.74015
[35] LopezS. An effective parametrization for asymptotic extrapolations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2000;189(1):297‐311. · Zbl 0983.74082
[36] XuF, Potier‐FerryM, BelouettarS, HuH. Multiple bifurcations in wrinkling analysis of thin films on compliant substrates. Int J Non Linear Mech. 2015;76:203‐222.
[37] ZagariG. Koiter’s asymptotic numerical methods for shell structures using a corotational formulation. Ph.D. Thesis: Universita Della Calabria; 2009.
[38] RahmanT, JansenEL. Finite element based multi‐mode initial post‐buckling analysis of composite cylindrical shells. In: 50th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference; 2009:1‐11.
[39] RahmanT. A perturbation approach for geometrically nonlinear structural analysis using a general purpose finite element code. Ph.D. Thesis: Delft University of Technology; 2009.
[40] HaftkaRT, MallettRH, NachbarW. Adaption of Koiter’s method to finite element analysis of snap‐through buckling behavior. Int J Solids Struct. 1971;7(10):1427‐1445. · Zbl 0237.73029
[41] SalernoG, CasciaroR. Mode jumping and attractive paths in multimode elastic buckling. Int J Numer Meth Eng. 1997;40(5):833‐861. · Zbl 0886.73019
[42] GarceaG, CasciaroR, AttanasioG, GiordanoF. Perturbation approach to elastic post‐buckling analysis. Comput Struct. 1998;66(5):585‐595. · Zbl 0933.74026
[43] KoiterWT. On the stability of the elastic equilibrium. Ph.D. Thesis: Delft University of Technology; 1945.
[44] LiangK, AbdallaM, GürdalZ. A Koiter‐Newton approach for nonlinear structural analysis. Int J Numer Meth Eng. 2013;96(12):763‐786. · Zbl 1352.74122
[45] LiangK, RuessM, AbdallaM. The Koiter‐Newton approach using von Kármán kinematics for buckling analyses of imperfection sensitive structures. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2014;279(1):440‐468. · Zbl 1423.74345
[46] LiangKe. A Koiter‐Newton arc‐length method for buckling sensitive structures. Ph.D. Thesis: Delft University of Technology; 2013.
[47] LiangK, RuessM, AbdallaM. Co‐rotational finite element formulation used in the Koiter‐Newton method for nonlinear buckling analyses. Finite Elem Anal Des. 2016;116:38‐54.
[48] MagisanoD, LeonettiL, GarceaG. Advantages of the mixed format in geometrically nonlinear analysis of beams and shells using solid finite elements. Int J Numer Meth Eng. 2017;109(9):1237‐1262. · Zbl 07874310
[49] LiangK, RuessM, AbdallaM. An eigenanalysis‐based bifurcation indicator proposed in the framework of a reduced‐order modeling technique for non‐linear structural analysis. Int J Non Linear Mech. 2016;81(1):129‐138.
[50] LiangK, RuessM. Nonlinear buckling analysis of the conical and cylindrical shells using the SGL strain based reduced order model and the PHC method. Aerosp Sci Technol. 2016;55:103‐110.
[51] RiksE. An incremental approach to the solution of snapping and buckling problems. Int J Solids Struct. 1979;15:524‐551. · Zbl 0408.73040
[52] RiksE. Buckling analysis of elastic structures: a computational approach. Adv Appl Mech. 1997;34:1‐76. · Zbl 0889.73032
[53] WempnerGA. Discrete approximation related to nonlinear theories of solids. Int J Solids Struct. 1971;17:1581‐1599. · Zbl 0222.73054
[54] ChangSC, ChenJJ. Effectiveness of linear bifurcation analysis for predicting the nonlinear stability limits of structures. Int J Numer Meth Eng. 1986;23(5):831‐846. · Zbl 0584.73044
[55] ElishakoffI, LiYW, Jr JHS. Imperfection sensitivity due to the elastic moduli in the Roorda‐Koiter frame. Chaos, Solitons Fractals. 1996;7(8):1179‐1186.
[56] KouhiaR, MikkolaM. Some aspects of efficient path‐following. Comput Struct. 1999;72:509‐524. · Zbl 1050.74671
[57] ErikssonA. Derivatives of tangential stiffness matrices for equilibrium path descriptions. Int J Numer Meth Eng. 1991;32:1093‐1113. · Zbl 0758.73046
[58] LahmamH, CadouJM, ZahrouniH, DamilN, Potier‐FerryM. High‐order predictor‐corrector algorithms. Int J Numer Meth Eng. 2002;55(6):685‐704. · Zbl 1058.76572
[59] IbrahimbegovicA. Stress resultant geometrically nonlinear shell theory with drilling rotations: part I. A consistent formulation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 1994;118(3‐4):265‐284. · Zbl 0849.73036
[60] ChroscielewskiJ, MakowskiJ, StumpfH. Genuinely resultant shell finite elements accounting for geometric and material non‐linearity. Int J Numer Meth Eng. 1992;35(1):63‐94. · Zbl 0780.73075
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.