×

Study on autonomous and nonautonomous version of a food chain model with intraspecific competition in top predator. (English) Zbl 1452.92045

Summary: In this article, a three-species food chain model with intraspecific competition in top predators has been considered. Ecological and mathematical well posedness of the model system has been established by showing that all the solutions of the model are positive and bounded. The extinction scenarios of intermediate and top predator species along with the existence and stability of all equilibrium points have been discussed. The effects of competition and conversion efficiency of top predators in the dynamics of the system have been discussed with great thrust, and it is observed that the conversion efficiency of top predators deteriorates the stability of the system, whereas intraspecific competition in top predators enhances the stable coexistence of all the populations of the system. Further, nonautonomous version of the model system has been taken into consideration to study the impact of seasonal variation in the dynamics of the model system. Sufficient conditions for the existence of a globally attractive positive periodic have been established in a periodic environment. Finally, numerical simulations have been carried out to validate our analytical findings.

MSC:

92D40 Ecology
34C11 Growth and boundedness of solutions to ordinary differential equations
34C23 Bifurcation theory for ordinary differential equations
34C25 Periodic solutions to ordinary differential equations
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] CollingsJ. Bifurcation and stability analysis of a temperature dependent mite predator‐prey interaction model incorporating a prey refuge. B Math Biol. 1995;57:63‐76. · Zbl 0810.92024
[2] TannerJT. The stability and intrinsic growth rates of prey and predator populations. Ecology. 1975;56:855‐867.
[3] RoyS, AlamS, ChattopadhyayJ. Competing effects of toxin‐producing phytoplankton on overall plankton populations in the bay of Bengal. B Math Biol. 2006;68:2303‐2320. · Zbl 1296.92236
[4] AlamS. Risk of disease‐selective predation in an infected prey‐predator system. J Bio Syst. 2009;17:111‐124. · Zbl 1369.92087
[5] MatiaSN, AlamS. Prey‐predator dynamics under herd behavior of prey. Univ J Appl Math. 2013;1:251‐257.
[6] DubeyB, ChandraP, SinhaP. A model for fishery resource with reserve area. Nonliner Anal RWA. 2003;4:625‐637. · Zbl 1011.92049
[7] AjraldiV, PittavinoM, VenturinoE. Modeling herd behavior in population systems. Nonlinear Anal Real World Appl. 2011;12:2319‐2338. · Zbl 1225.49037
[8] LotkaAJ. Elements of Physical Biology. Baltimore:Williams and Wilkins; 1925. · JFM 51.0416.06
[9] VolterraV. Fluctuations in the abundance of species considered mathematically. Nature. 1926;118:558‐560. · JFM 52.0453.03
[10] FreedmanH, WolkowiczG. Predator‐prey systems with group defense: the paradox of enrichment revisited. Bull Math Biol. 1986;48:493‐508. · Zbl 0612.92017
[11] BeltramiE, CarrollTO. Modelling the role of viral disease in recurrent phytoplankton blooms. J Math Biol. 1994;32:857‐863. · Zbl 0825.92122
[12] DasP, DasP, DasS. An investigation on Monod‐Haldane immune response based tumor‐effector‐interleukin‐2 interactions with treatments. Appl Math Comput. 2019;361:536‐551. · Zbl 1428.92047
[13] DasP, MukherjeeS, DasP. An investigation on Michaelis‐Menten kinetics based complex dynamics of tumor‐immune interaction. Chaos Sol Fract. 2019;128:297‐305. · Zbl 1483.92074
[14] GaoD, LiangX. A completion diffusion system with a refuge. Discrete Cont Dyn Syst. 2007;8:435‐454. · Zbl 1142.34344
[15] ZhangR, SunJ, YangH. Analysis of a prey‐predator fishery model with prey reserve. Appl Math Sci. 2007;1:2481‐2492. · Zbl 1135.92331
[16] MurdochWW, OatenA, Predation and population stability. Adv Ecol Res. 1975;9:1‐31.
[17] OatenA, MurdochWW. Functional response and stability in predator‐prey systems. Amer Nar. 1975;109:289‐298.
[18] MayRM. Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems. Princeton, N.J.:Princeton Univ. Press; 1975.
[19] HastingsA, PowellT. Chaos in a three species food chain. Ecology. 1991;72:896‐903.
[20] FreedmanHI, WaltmanP.. Persistence in models of three interacting predatorâÅŞ prey populations. Math Biosci. 1994;68:213‐231. · Zbl 0534.92026
[21] CampionS, CenaR, GalloA, VenturinoE. Effects of diseased top predators in food chains. Adv Res. 2014;2(12):833‐845. https://doi.org/10.9734/AIR/2014/11349 · doi:10.9734/AIR/2014/11349
[22] RossiAD, LisaF, RubiniL, ZappavignaL, VenturinoE. A food chain ecoepidemic model: infection at the bottom trophic level. Ecol Complex. 2015;21:233‐245.
[23] MayRM, LeonardWJ. Nonlinear aspects of competition between three species. SIAM. J Appl Math. 1975;29:243‐253. · Zbl 0314.92008
[24] LetellierC, Aziz‐AlaouiMA. Analysis of the dynamics of a realistic ecological model. Chaos Solitons Fract. 2002;13:95‐107. · Zbl 0977.92029
[25] FanM, KuangY. Dynamics of as nonautonomous predator‐prey system with the Beddington‐DeAngelis functional response. J Math Anal Appl. 2004;295:15‐39. · Zbl 1051.34033
[26] PimmSL, LawtonJH. On feeding on more than one trophic level. Nature. 1978:275.
[27] AbramsPA, RothJD. The effects of enrichment of three‐species food chains with nonlinear functional responses. it Ecology. 1994:11‐18.
[28] RosenzweigML, MacArthurRH. Graphical representation and stability conditions of predator‐prey interactions. Am Nat. 1963;97:209‐223.
[29] AbramsPA, MatsudaH. The effect of adaptive change in the prey on the dynamics of an exploited predator population. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 2005;62:758‐766.
[30] ConnellJ. On the prevalence and relative importance of interspecific competition: evidence from field experiments. American Naturalist. 1983;122:661‐696. https://doi.org/10.1086/284165 · doi:10.1086/284165
[31] MayR, ConwayG, HassellM, delaysSouthwoodT.. Time density‐dependence and single‐species oscillations. J Anim Ecol. 1974;3:747‐770.
[32] DaytonP. Competition, disturbance, and community organization: the provision and subsequent utilization of space in a rocky intertidal community. Ecol Monogr. 1971;41:351‐389.
[33] PaineR. Ecological determinism in the competition for space. Ecology. 1984;65:1339‐1348.
[34] HansenT, StensethN, HenttonenH, TastJ. Interspecific and intraspecific competition as causes of direct and delayed density dependence in a fluctuating vole population. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;96:986‐991.
[35] TinkerMT, DoakD, demographyEstesJ.. Using demography and movement behavior to predict range expansion of the southern sea otter. Eco Appl. 2008a;18:1781‐1794.
[36] HuoHF, LiWT. Existence of positive periodic solution of a neutral impulsive delay predator‐prey system. Applied Mathematics and Computation. 2006;184:499‐507. · Zbl 1120.34050
[37] SunSL, ChenLS. Existence of positive periodic solution of an impulsive delay logistic model. Appl Math Comput. 2007;184:617‐623. · Zbl 1125.34063
[38] WangK, ZhuYL. Global attractivity of positive periodic solution for a Volterra model. Appl Math Comput. 2008;203:493‐501. · Zbl 1178.34052
[39] AlzabutJO, AbdeljawadT. On existence of a globally attractive periodic solution of impulsive delay logarithmic population model. Appl Math Comput. 2008;198:463‐469. · Zbl 1163.92033
[40] ZhuY, WangK. Existence and global attractivity of positive periodic solutions for a predator‐prey model with modified Leslie‐Gower Holling‐type II schemes. J Math Anal Appl. 2011;384:400‐408. · Zbl 1232.34077
[41] GuoH, ChenX. Existence and global attractivity of positive periodic solution for a Volterra model with mutual interference and BeddingtonâÅŞDeAngelis functional response. Appl Math Comput. 2011;217:5830‐5837. · Zbl 1217.34081
[42] GainesRE, MawhinJL. Coincidence Degree and Nonlinear Differential Equations. Berlin:Springer; 1977. · Zbl 0339.47031
[43] PerkoL. Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems. New York:Springer; 2001. · Zbl 0973.34001
[44] XuR. Periodic solution for a three‐species Lotka‐Volterra food‐chain model with time delays. Math Comput Modell. 2004;40:823‐837. · Zbl 1067.92063
[45] WangK, ZhuY. Global attractivity of positive periodic solution for a predator‐prey model with modified Leslie‐Gower Holling‐type II schemes and a deviating argument. Int J Biomath. 2014;7(6):1‐13. · Zbl 1314.34164
[46] DingX, LuC.. Existence of positive periodic solution for ratio‐dependent n‐species difference system. Appl Math Modell. 2009;33:2748‐2756. · Zbl 1205.39001
[47] WangK. Permanence and global asymptotical stability of a predator‐prey model with mutual interference. Nonlinear Anal Real World Appl. 2011;12(2):1062‐1071. · Zbl 1213.34067
[48] WangK, ZhuYL. Permanence and global asymptotic stability of a delayed predator‐prey model with Hassell‐Varley type functional response. Bull Iranian Math Soc. 2011;37(3):197‐215. · Zbl 1260.34153
[49] GopalsamyK. Stability and Oscillations in Delay Differential Equations of Population Dynamics. Boston:Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1992. · Zbl 0752.34039
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.