Preferences in artificial intelligence. (English) Zbl 1371.68262
Summary: The paper presents a focused survey about the presence and the use of the concept of “preferences” in Artificial Intelligence. Preferences are a central concept for decision making and have extensively been studied in disciplines such as economy, operational research, decision analysis, psychology and philosophy. However, in the recent years it has also become an important topic both for research and applications in Computer Science and more specifically in Artificial Intelligence, in fields spanning from recommender systems to automatic planning, from non monotonic reasoning to computational social choice and algorithmic decision theory. The survey essentially covers the basics of preference modelling, the use of preference in reasoning and argumentation, the problem of compact representations of preferences, preference learning and the use of non conventional preference models based on extended logical languages. It aims at providing a general reference for all researchers both in
Artificial Intelligence and Decision Analysis interested in this exciting interdisciplinary topic.
MSC:
| 68T27 | Logic in artificial intelligence |
| 68T05 | Learning and adaptive systems in artificial intelligence |
| 68T30 | Knowledge representation |
| 68T37 | Reasoning under uncertainty in the context of artificial intelligence |
| 91B14 | Social choice |
Keywords:
preferences; preference-based systems; reasoning about preferences; preferences in logic; nonmonotonic logic; representation of preferences; preference elicitation; utility elicitation; nonclassical preference modelsReferences:
| [1] | Åqvist, L.; Gabbay, D. (ed.); Guenthner, F. (ed.), Deontic logic, 147-264 (1984), Dordrecht |
| [2] | Adams, E.: The Logic of Conditionals. Reidel, Dordrecht (1975) · Zbl 0324.02002 · doi:10.1007/978-94-015-7622-2 |
| [3] | Alchourrón, C.; Meyer, JJ (ed.); Wieringa, R. (ed.), Philosophical foundations of deontic logic and the logic of defeasible conditionals, 43-84 (1993), New York |
| [4] | Aleskerov, F., Bouyssou, D., Monjardet, B.: Utility Maximization, Choice and Preference, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin (2007) · Zbl 1130.91022 |
| [5] | Alsina, C.: On a family of connectives for fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 16, 231-235 (1985) · Zbl 0577.39010 · doi:10.1016/0165-0114(85)90026-0 |
| [6] | Amgoud, L.: A formal framework for handling conflicting desires. In: Proceedings of ECSQARU’03, vol. 2711, pp. 552-563 (2003) · Zbl 1274.68448 |
| [7] | Amgoud, L., Cayrol, C.: Integrating preference orderings into argument-based reasoning, pp. 159-170 (1997) · Zbl 1274.90030 |
| [8] | Amgoud, L., Cayrol, C.: On the acceptability of arguments in preference-based argumentation framework. In: Proceedings of UAI’98, pp. 1-7 (1998) |
| [9] | Amgoud, L., Cayrol, C.: A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell. 34, 197-216 (2002) · Zbl 1002.68172 · doi:10.1023/A:1014490210693 |
| [10] | Amgoud, L., Cayrol, C., LeBerre, D.: Comparing arguments using preference orderings for argument-based reasoning. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, pp. 400-403 (1996) |
| [11] | Amgoud, L., Dimopoulos, Y., Moraitis, P.: A unified and general framework for argumentation-based negotiation. In: Proceedings of AAMAS’07, pp. 158:1-158:8 (2007) · Zbl 1135.68581 |
| [12] | Amgoud, L., Dimopoulos, Y., Moraitis, P.: Making decisions through preference- based argumentation. In: Proceedings of KR‘08, pp. 113-123 (2008) · Zbl 1135.68581 |
| [13] | Amgoud, L., Maudet, N., Parsons, S.: Modeling dialogues using argumentation. In: Proceedingd of ICMAS’00, pp. 31-38 (2000) |
| [14] | Amgoud, L., Prade, H.: Using arguments for making and explaining decisions. Artif. Intell. 173, 413-436 (2009) · Zbl 1343.68219 · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2008.11.006 |
| [15] | Amgoud, L., Vesic, S.: Generalizing stable semantics by preferences. In: COMMA, pp. 39-50 (2010) |
| [16] | Amgoud, L., Vesic, S.: A new approach for preference-based argumentation frameworks. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell. 63, 149-183 (2011) · Zbl 1234.68371 · doi:10.1007/s10472-011-9271-9 |
| [17] | Arieli, O., Avron, A.: The value of the four values. Artif. Intell. 102, 97-141 (1998) · Zbl 0928.03025 · doi:10.1016/S0004-3702(98)00032-0 |
| [18] | Arieli, O., Avron, A., Zamansky, A.: Ideal paraconsistent logics. Stud. Logica. 99, 31-60 (2011) · Zbl 1248.03046 · doi:10.1007/s11225-011-9346-y |
| [19] | Arieli, O.; Cornelis, C.; Deschrijver, G., Preference modeling by rectangular bilattices, 22-33 (2006), Berlin · Zbl 1235.68231 |
| [20] | Arrow, K.: Social Choice and Individual Values, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York (1963) · Zbl 0984.91513 |
| [21] | Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T., McBurney, P.: Persuasive political argument. In: Computational Models of Natural Argument, IJCAI’05 workshop, pp. 44-51 (2005) · Zbl 1117.68504 |
| [22] | Baader, F., Hollunder, B.: Priorities on defaults with prerequisites, and their application in treating specificity in terminological default logic. J. Autom. Reason. 15(1), 41-68 (1995) · Zbl 0842.68081 · doi:10.1007/BF00881830 |
| [23] | Bacchus, F., Grove, A.: Graphical models for preference and utility. In: Proceedings of UAI’95, pp. 3-10 (1995) · Zbl 1170.91303 |
| [24] | Baier, J.A., McIlraith, S.A.: Planning with Preferences. AI Mag. 29(4), 25-36 (2008) |
| [25] | Barberà, S., Bossert, W., Pattanaik, P.K.: Ranking sets of objects. In: Barberà, S., Hammond, P., Seidl, C. (eds.) Handbook of Utility Theory, Vol 2: Extensions, pp. 893-977. Springer, Berlin (2004) |
| [26] | Belnap, N.: How a computer should think. In: Proceedings of the Oxford International Symposium on Contemporary Aspects of Philosophy, pp. 30-56, Oxford (1976) |
| [27] | Belnap, N.; Epstein, G. (ed.); Dunn, J. (ed.), A useful four-valued logic, 8-37 (1977), Dordrecht · Zbl 0417.03009 |
| [28] | Belton, V., Gear, T.: On a short-coming of saaty’s method of analytic hierarchies. Omega 11(3), 228-230 (1983) · doi:10.1016/0305-0483(83)90047-6 |
| [29] | Benabbou, N., Perny, P., Viappiani, P.: Incremental elicitation of choquet capacities for multicriteria decision making. In: ECAI 2014 - 21st European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 18-22 August 2014, Prague, Czech Republic, pp. 87-92 (2014) · Zbl 1366.91044 |
| [30] | Bench-Capon, T., Dunne, P.: Argumentation in artificial intelligence. Artif. Intell. 171, 619-641 (2007) · Zbl 1168.68560 · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2007.05.001 |
| [31] | Bench-Capon, T.J.M.: Persuasion in practical argument using value-based argumentation frameworks. J. Log. Comput. 13, 429-448 (2003) · Zbl 1043.03026 · doi:10.1093/logcom/13.3.429 |
| [32] | Benferhat, S., Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Argumentative inference in uncertain and inconsistent knowledge bases. In: Proceedings of UAI’93, pp. 411-419 (1993) |
| [33] | Benferhat, S., Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Towards a possibilistic logic handling of preferences. Appl. Intell. 14, 303-317 (2001) · Zbl 0986.91006 · doi:10.1023/A:1011298804831 |
| [34] | Benthem, J.; Grossi, D.; Liu, F.; Governatori, G. (ed.); Sartor, G. (ed.), Deontics = betterness + priority, 50-65 (2010), Berlin · Zbl 1250.03042 · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-14183-6_6 |
| [35] | Bergstra, J., Bethke, I., Rodenburg, P.: A propositional logic with four values: true, false, divergent and meaningless. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 5, 199-217 (1995) · Zbl 0843.03012 · doi:10.1080/11663081.1995.10510855 |
| [36] | Besnard, P., Hunter, A.: Elements of Argumentation. MIT Press (2008) |
| [37] | Bienvenu, M., Lang, J., Wilson, N.: From preference logics to preference languages, and back. In: Proceedings of KR 10, pp. 214-224 (2010) |
| [38] | Bigot, D., Zanuttini, B., Fargier, H., Mengin, J.: Probabilistic conditional preference networks. CoRR arXiv:1309.6817 (2013) · Zbl 0843.03012 |
| [39] | Bistarelli, S., Pini, M., Rossi, F., Venable, K.: From soft constraints to bipolar preferences: modelling framework and solving issues. J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell. 22, 135-158 (2010) · Zbl 1207.68343 · doi:10.1080/09528130903010212 |
| [40] | Bistarelli, S., Pini, M., Rossi, F., Venable, K.: Uncertainty in bipolar preference problems. J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell. 23, 545-575 (2011) · doi:10.1080/0952813X.2010.524288 |
| [41] | Boella, G., van der Torre, L., Verhagen, H.: Introduction to normative multiagent systems. Computation and Mathematical Organizational Theory, Special issue on Normative Multiagent Systems 12(2-3), 71-79 (2006) · doi:10.1007/s10588-006-9537-7 |
| [42] | Bondarenko, A., Dung, P., Kowalski, R., Toni, F.: An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning. Artif. Intell. 93, 63-101 (1997) · Zbl 1017.03511 · doi:10.1016/S0004-3702(97)00015-5 |
| [43] | Bondarenko, A., Toni, F., Kowalski, R.: An assumption-based framework for non-monotonic reasoning. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning, pp. 171-189 (1993) |
| [44] | Booth, R., Chevaleyre, Y., Lang, J., Mengin, J., Sombattheera, C.: Learning conditionally lexicographic preference relations. In: Proceedings of ECAI’10, pp. 269-274 (2010) · Zbl 1211.68223 |
| [45] | Bossu, G., Siegel, P.: Saturation, nonmonotonic reasoning and the closed-world assumption. Artif. Intell. 25, 13-65 (1985) · Zbl 0569.68078 · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(85)90040-2 |
| [46] | Boutilier, C.: What is a default priority. In: Proceedings of Canadian Society for Computational Studies of Intelligence Conference, pp. 140-147 (1992) |
| [47] | Boutilier, C.: A POMDP formulation of preference elicitation problems. In: Proceedings of AAAI’02, pp. 239-246 (2002) |
| [48] | Boutilier, C., Bacchus, F., Brafman, R.: UCP-networks: a directed graphical representation of conditional utilities. In: Proceedings of UAI’01, pp. 56-64 (2001) |
| [49] | Boutilier, C., Brafman, R., Hoos, H., Poole, D.: Reasoning with conditional ceteris paribus preference statements. In: Proceedings of UAI’99, pp. 71-80 (1999) · Zbl 1080.68685 |
| [50] | Boutilier, C., Patrascu, R., Poupart, P., Schuurmans, D.: Constraint-based optimization and utility elicitation using the minimax decision criterion. Artif. Intell. 170, 686-713 (2006) · Zbl 1131.91317 · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2006.02.003 |
| [51] | Bouyssou, D., Marchant, T., Pirlot, M., Perny, P., Tsoukiàs, A., Vincke, P.: Evaluation and Decision Models: a Critical Perspective. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2000) · Zbl 1107.90366 · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-1593-7 |
| [52] | Bouyssou, D., Marchant, T., Pirlot, M., Tsoukiàs, A., Vincke, P.: Evaluation and Decision Models with Multiple Criteria: Stepping Stones for the Analyst. Springer, Boston (2006) · Zbl 1140.90027 |
| [53] | Bouyssou, D., Pirlot, M.: Preferences for multiattributed alternatives: traces, dominance, and numerical representations. J. Math. Psychol. 48, 167-185 (2004) · Zbl 1115.91020 · doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2004.02.005 |
| [54] | Bouyssou, D.; Pirlot, M.; Figueira, J. (ed.); Greco, S. (ed.); Ehrgott, M. (ed.), Conjoint measurement tools for MCDM, 73-132 (2005), Boston · Zbl 1072.90526 |
| [55] | Bouyssou, D., Pirlot, M.: Following the traces: - an introduction to conjoint measurement without transitivity and additivity. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 163, 287-337 (2005) · Zbl 1104.91014 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2003.11.019 |
| [56] | Bouyssou, D.; Pirlot, M.; Bouyssou, D. (ed.); Dubois, D. (ed.); Pirlot, M. (ed.); Prade, H. (ed.), Conjoint measurement models for preference relations, 617-672 (2009), New York · Zbl 1039.91064 · doi:10.1002/9780470611876.ch16 |
| [57] | Brafman, R., Dimopoulos, Y.: Extended semantics and optimization algorithms for CP-networks. Comput. Intell. 20, 219-245 (2004) · doi:10.1111/j.0824-7935.2004.00236.x |
| [58] | Brafman, R., Domshlak, C.: Introducing variable importance tradeoffs into CP-Nets. In: Proceedings of UAI’02, pp. 69-76 (2002) · Zbl 1153.68474 |
| [59] | Brafman, R., Domshlak, C.: Graphically structured value-function compilation. Artif. Intell. 172, 325-349 (2008) · Zbl 1182.68223 · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2007.07.002 |
| [60] | Brafman, R., Domshlak, C.: Preference handling: an introductory tutorial. AI Mag. 30, 58-86 (2008) |
| [61] | Brafman, R., Roberts, F., Tsoukiàs, A.: Proceedings of ADT 2011. LNAI 6992. Springer, Berlin (2011) · Zbl 1225.90005 |
| [62] | Braunhofer, M., Kaminskas, M., Ricci, F.: Location-aware music recommendation. IJMIR 2(1), 31-44 (2013) |
| [63] | Brewka, G.: Preferred subtheories: An extended logical framework for default reasoning. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence - Volume 2, IJCAI’89, pp. 1043-1048. Morgan Kaufmann (1989) · Zbl 0713.68053 |
| [64] | Brewka, G.; MacNish, C. (ed.); Pearce, D. (ed.); Pereira, LM (ed.), Adding priorities and specificity to default logic, 247-260 (1994), Berlin Heidelberg · Zbl 0988.68614 · doi:10.1007/BFb0021977 |
| [65] | Brewka, G.: Reasoning about priorities in default logic. In: Proceedings of the 12th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 940-945. MIT Press (1994) |
| [66] | Brewka, G.: A rank-based description language for qualitative preferences. In: Proceedings of ECAI 04, p. 303307 (2004) · Zbl 1115.91020 |
| [67] | Brewka, G., Niemel, I., Truszczynski, M.: Answer set optimization. In: Proceedings of IJCAI’03, pp. 867-872 (2003) |
| [68] | Brewka, G., Niemela, I., Truszczynski, M.: Preferences and nonmonotonic reasoning. AI Mag. 29, 69-78 (2008) |
| [69] | Brinker, K., Hüllermeier, E.: Case-based label ranking. In: Fürnkranz, J., Scheffer, T., Spiliopoulou, M. (eds.) ECML, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4212, pp. 566-573. Springer (2006) · Zbl 1171.03009 |
| [70] | Britz, K., Heidema, J., Meyer, T.A.: Semantic preferential subsumption. In: Proceedings of KR’08, pp. 476-484 (2008) · Zbl 0435.68074 |
| [71] | Britz, K., Meyer, T., Varzinczak, I.: Preferential reasoning for modal logics. Electron. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci. 278, 55-69 (2011) · Zbl 1347.03042 · doi:10.1016/j.entcs.2011.10.006 |
| [72] | Caminada, M., Amgoud, L.: On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms. Artif. Intell. 171, 286-310 (2007) · Zbl 1168.68562 · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2007.02.003 |
| [73] | Casini, G., Straccia, U.: Rational closure for defeasible description logics. In: Proceedings of JELIA’10, pp. 77-90 (2010) · Zbl 1306.68187 |
| [74] | Castañeda, H.; Hilpinen, R. (ed.), The paradoxes of deontic logic: the simplest solution to all of them in one fell swoop, 37-85 (1981), Doredrecht · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-8484-4_2 |
| [75] | Cayrol, C., Royer, V., Saurel, C.: Management of preferences in assumption-based reasoning. In: Proceedings of IPMU’92, pp. 13-22 (1993) |
| [76] | Chajewska, U., Koller, D., Parr, R.: Making rational decisions using adaptive utility elicitation. In: Proceedings of AAAI’00, pp. 363-369 (2000) |
| [77] | Chellas, B.; Stunland, S. (ed.), Conditional obligation, 23-33 (1974), Dordrecht · Zbl 0288.02016 · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-2191-3_3 |
| [78] | Chevaleyre, Y., Endriss, U., Lang, J.: Expressive power of weighted propositional formulas for cardinal preference modeling. In: Proceedings of KR’06, pp. 145-152 (2006) |
| [79] | Chevaleyre, Y., Endriss, U., Lang, J., Maudet, N.: Preference handling in combinatorial domains: from AI to social choice. AI Mag. 29(4), 37-46 (2008). http://www.aaai.org/ojs/index.php/aimagazine/article/view/2201 |
| [80] | Chevaleyre, Y.; Koriche, F.; Lang, J.; Mengin, J.; Zanuttini, B.; Fürnkranz, J. (ed.); Hüllermeier, E. (ed.), Learning ordinal preferences on multiattribute domains: the case of cp-nets, 273-296 (2011), Berlin · Zbl 1214.68277 |
| [81] | Chisholm, R.: Perceiving. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1957) |
| [82] | Chisholm, R.: Theory of Knowledge. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1966) · Zbl 0136.37502 |
| [83] | Colorni, A.; Tsoukiàs, A., What is a decision problem? preliminary statements, 139-153 (2013), Berlin |
| [84] | Bana e Costa, C.A., Vansnick, J.C.: MACBETH - an interactive path towards the construction of cardinal value functions. Int. Trans. Oper. Res. 1, 489-500 (1994) · Zbl 0857.90004 · doi:10.1016/0969-6016(94)90010-8 |
| [85] | Bana e Costa, C.A., Vansnick, J.C.: A critical analysis of the eigenvalue method used to derive priorities in AHP. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 187, 1422-1428 (2008) · Zbl 1137.91350 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2006.09.022 |
| [86] | Critchlow, D.E., Fligner, M.A., Verducci, J.S.: Probability models on rankings. J. Math. Psychol. 35, 294-318 (1991) · Zbl 0741.62024 · doi:10.1016/0022-2496(91)90050-4 |
| [87] | Danielsson, S.: Preference and obligation. Studies in the logic of ethics. Filosofiska föreningen, Uppsala (1968) · Zbl 1082.91042 |
| [88] | de Finetti, B.: La prévision : ses lois logiques, ses sources subjectives. In: Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré, vol. 7, pp. 1-68. Paris (1937). Translated into English by Henry E. Kyburg Jr., Foresight: Its Logical Laws, its Subjective Sources. In Henry E. Kyburg Jr. and Howard E. Smokler (1964, Eds.), Studies in Subjective Probability, 53-118, Wiley, New York |
| [89] | Delgrande, J.P., Schaub, T.: Expressing preferences in default logic. Artif. Intell. 123(1-2), 41-87 (2000) · Zbl 0952.68134 · doi:10.1016/S0004-3702(00)00049-7 |
| [90] | Delgrande, J.P., Schaub, T.H.: Compiling reasoning with and about preferences into default logic. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Joint Conference on Artifical Intelligence - Volume 1, IJCAI’97, pp. 168-174. Morgan Kaufmann (1997) · Zbl 0569.68079 |
| [91] | Deschrijver, G., Arieli, O., Cornelis, C., Kerre, E.: A bilattice-based framework for handling graded truth and imprecision. J. Uncertainty Fuzziness Knowledge Based Syst. 15, 13-41 (2007) · Zbl 1121.03073 · doi:10.1142/S0218488507004352 |
| [92] | Doherty, P., Driankov, D., Tsoukiàs, A.: Partial logics and partial preferences. In: Proceedings of CEMIT’92, pp. 525-528 (1992) |
| [93] | Domshlak, C., Brafman, R.: CP-nets - reasoning and consistency testing. In: Proceedings of KR’02, pp. 121-132 (2002) · Zbl 1061.68147 |
| [94] | Domshlak, C., Hüllermeier, E., Kaci, S., Prade, H.: Preferences in AI: an overview. Artif. Intell. 175, 1037-1052 (2011) · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2011.03.004 |
| [95] | Doyle, J.: Prospects for preferences. Comput. Intell. 20, 111-136 (2004) · doi:10.1111/j.0824-7935.2004.00233.x |
| [96] | Doyle, J., Wellman, M.: Impediments to universal preference-based default theories. Artif. Intell. 49, 97-128 (1991) · Zbl 0736.68069 · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(91)90007-7 |
| [97] | Dubarle, D.: Essai sur la généralisation naturelle de la logique usuelle. Mathématique, Informatique, Sciences Humaines N∘ 107, 17-73 (1989). 1963 manuscript, published posthumously · Zbl 0692.03006 |
| [98] | Dubois, D., Fargier, H., Perny, P.: Qualitative decision theory with preference relations and comparative uncertainty: an axiomatic approach. Artif. Intell. 148, 219-260 (2003) · Zbl 1082.91512 · doi:10.1016/S0004-3702(03)00037-7 |
| [99] | Dubois, D., Fargier, H., Perny, P., Prade, H.: Qualitative decision theory: from Savage’s axioms to non-monotonic reasoning. J. ACM 49, 455-495 (2002) · Zbl 1326.68290 · doi:10.1145/581771.581772 |
| [100] | Dubois, D., Grabisch, M., Modave, F., Prade, H.: Relating decision under uncertainty and multicriteria decision making models. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 15, 967-979 (2000) · Zbl 0969.90050 · doi:10.1002/1098-111X(200010)15:10<967::AID-INT5>3.0.CO;2-D |
| [101] | Dubois, D., Prade, H.: A class of fuzzy measures based on triangular norms. Int. J. Gen. Syst. 8, 43-61 (1982) · Zbl 0473.94023 · doi:10.1080/03081078208934833 |
| [102] | Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Possibility Theory. Plenum Press, New-York (1988) · Zbl 0645.68108 · doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-5287-7 |
| [103] | Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Possibility theory as a basis for qualitative decision theory. In: Proceedings of IJCAI’95, pp. 1924-1930 (1995) |
| [104] | Dubois, D., Prade, H.: An introduction to bipolar representations of information and preference. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 23, 866-877 (2008) · Zbl 1147.68708 · doi:10.1002/int.20297 |
| [105] | Dubus, J., Gonzales, C., Perny, P.: Multiobjective optimization using GAI models. In: Proceedings of IJCAI’09, pp. 1902-1907 (2009) · Zbl 1260.91057 |
| [106] | Dung, P.: An argumentation semantics for logic programming with explicit negation. In: Proceedings of the 10th Logic Programming Conference, pp. 616-630 (1993) · Zbl 0252.02023 |
| [107] | Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artif. Intell. 77, 321-357 (1995) · Zbl 1013.68556 · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(94)00041-X |
| [108] | Dupinde Saint-Cyr, F., Lang, J., Schiex, T.: Penalty logic and its link with DempsterShafer theory. In: Proceedings of UAI’94, pp. 204-211 (1994) · Zbl 1059.90088 |
| [109] | Dyer, J.S.: A clarification of “remarks on the analytic hierarchy process”. Manag. Sci. 36(3), 274-275 (1990). http://www.jstor.org/stable/2631949 · doi:10.1287/mnsc.36.3.274 |
| [110] | Dyer, J.S.: Remarks on the analytic hierarchy process. Manag. Sci. 36(3), 249-258 (1990). http://www.jstor.org/stable/2631946 · doi:10.1287/mnsc.36.3.249 |
| [111] | Ehrgott, M.: Multiobjective optimization. AI Mag. 29(4), 47-57 (2008). http://www.aaai.org/ojs/index.php/aimagazine/article/view/2198 |
| [112] | Etherington, D.: Reasoning with Incomplete Information. Pitman, London (1988) · Zbl 0694.68003 |
| [113] | Fages, F., Ruet, P.: Combining explicit negation and negation by failure via belnap’s logic. Theor. Comput. Sci. 171, 61-75 (1997) · Zbl 0874.68045 · doi:10.1016/S0304-3975(96)00125-9 |
| [114] | Fargier, H., Sabadin, R.: Qualitative decision under uncertainty: back to expected utility. Artif. Intell. 164, 245-280 (2005) · Zbl 1132.68770 · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2004.12.002 |
| [115] | Fishburn, P.: Utility Theory for Decision Making. Wiley, New York (1970) · Zbl 0213.46202 |
| [116] | Fishburn, P.: Lexicographic orders, utilities and decision rules: a survey. Manag. Sci. 20, 1442-1471 (1974) · Zbl 0311.90007 · doi:10.1287/mnsc.20.11.1442 |
| [117] | Fishburn, P.: Interval Orders and Interval Graphs. Wiley, New York (1985) · Zbl 0568.05047 |
| [118] | Fishburn, P.: Nonlinear Preference and Utility Theory. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore (1988) · Zbl 0715.90001 |
| [119] | Fishburn, P.: Preference structures and their numerical representations. Theor. Comput. Sci. 217, 359-383 (1999) · Zbl 0914.68181 · doi:10.1016/S0304-3975(98)00277-1 |
| [120] | Fitting, M.: Bilattices and the semantics of logic programming. J. Log. Program. 11, 91-116 (1991) · Zbl 0757.68028 · doi:10.1016/0743-1066(91)90014-G |
| [121] | Fodor, J., Roubens, M.: Fuzzy Preference Modelling and Multicriteria Decision Support. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1994) · Zbl 0827.90002 · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-1648-2 |
| [122] | Føllesdal, D.; Hilpinen, R.; Hilpinen, R. (ed.), Deontic logic: an introduction (1971), Dordrecht · Zbl 0228.02012 |
| [123] | Font, J., Moussavi, M.: Note on a six valued extension of three valued logics. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 3, 173-187 (1993) · Zbl 0806.03019 · doi:10.1080/11663081.1993.10510806 |
| [124] | Forrester, J.W.: Gentle murder, or the adverbial samaritan. J. Philos. 81, 193-196 (1984) · doi:10.2307/2026120 |
| [125] | Fortemps, P., Słowiński, R.: A graded quadrivalent logic for ordinal preference modelling: loyola-like approach. Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Making 1, 93-111 (2002) · Zbl 1091.91504 · doi:10.1023/A:1013731910441 |
| [126] | Fürnkranz, J., Hüllermeier, E., Cheng, W., Park, S.H.: Preference-based reinforcement learning: a formal framework and a policy iteration algorithm. Mach. Learn. 89, 123-156 (2012) · Zbl 1260.68328 · doi:10.1007/s10994-012-5313-8 |
| [127] | Gabbay, D., Theoretical foundations for nonmonotonic reasoning in expert systems, 439-457 (1985), Berlin · Zbl 0581.68068 · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-82453-1_15 |
| [128] | Gajos, K., Weld, D.S.: Preference elicitation for interface optimization. In: Proceedings of UIST’05, pp. 173-182 (2005) · Zbl 1067.03038 |
| [129] | García, A., Simari, G.: Defeasible logic programming: an argumentative approach. Theory Pract. Logic Program. 4, 95-138 (2004) · Zbl 1090.68015 · doi:10.1017/S1471068403001674 |
| [130] | Gedikli, F., Jannach, D., Ge, M.: How should I explain? A comparison of different explanation types for recommender systems. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 72 (4), 367-382 (2014) · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2013.12.007 |
| [131] | Geffner, H., Pearl, J.: Conditional entailment: bridging two approaches to default reasoning. Artif. Intell. 53(2-3), 209-244 (1992) · Zbl 1193.68235 · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(92)90071-5 |
| [132] | Gelain, M., Pini, M., Rossi, F., Venable, K., Wilson, N.: Interval-valued soft constraint problems. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell. 58, 261-298 (2010) · Zbl 1207.68387 · doi:10.1007/s10472-010-9203-0 |
| [133] | Gelfond, M.; Lifschitz, V.; Warren, DH (ed.), Logic programs with classical negation, 579-597 (1990), Cambridge |
| [134] | Gelfond, M., Lifschitz, V.: Classical negation in logic programs and disjunctive databases. N. Gener. Comput. 9, 365-385 (1991) · Zbl 0735.68012 · doi:10.1007/BF03037169 |
| [135] | Gelfond, M., Przymusinska, H., Przymusinski, T.: On the relationship between circumscription and negation as failure. AIJ 38, 75-94 (1989) · Zbl 0663.68097 |
| [136] | Gilboa, I., Schmeidler, D., Wakker, P.: Utility in case-based decision theory. J. Econ. Theory 105, 483-502 (2002) · Zbl 1014.91017 · doi:10.1006/jeth.2001.2858 |
| [137] | Ginsberg, M.: Multivalued logics: a uniform approach to reasoning in artificial intelligence. Comput. Intell. 4, 265-316 (1988) · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8640.1988.tb00280.x |
| [138] | Giordano, L., Olivetti, N., Gliozzi, V., Pozzato, G.L.: Alc + t: a preferential extension of description logics. Fundamenta Informaticae 96, 341-372 (2009) · Zbl 1207.68369 |
| [139] | Goble, L.: A logic of good, would and should. part 1. J. Philos. Log. 19, 169-199 (1990) · Zbl 0698.03016 |
| [140] | Goble, L.: A logic of good, would and should. part 2. J. Philos. Log. 19, 253-276 (1990) · Zbl 0702.03010 · doi:10.1007/BF00556636 |
| [141] | Gonzales, C., Perny, P.: GAI networks for utility elicitation. In: Proceedings KR’04, pp. 224-234 (2004) |
| [142] | Gonzales, C., Perny, P., Queiroz, S.: Preference aggregation with graphical utility models. In: Proceedings of AAAI’08, pp. 1037-1042 (2008) · Zbl 0663.68097 |
| [143] | Gordon, T., The pleading game (1995), Dordrecht |
| [144] | Governatori, G., Maher, M., Antoniou, G., Billington, D.: Argumentation semantics for defeasible logic. J. Log. Comput. 14(5), 675-702 (2004) · Zbl 1067.03038 · doi:10.1093/logcom/14.5.675 |
| [145] | Grabisch, M.: Fuzzy integral in multicriteria decision making. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 69, 279-298 (1995) · Zbl 0845.90001 · doi:10.1016/0165-0114(94)00174-6 |
| [146] | Grabisch, M.; Labreuche, C.; Figueira, J. (ed.); Greco, S. (ed.); Ehrgott, M. (ed.), Fuzzy measures and integrals in MCDA, 563-608 (2005), Boston · Zbl 1072.90533 |
| [147] | Greco, S., Mousseau, V., Slowinski, R.: Ordinal regression revisited: Multiple criteria ranking using a set of additive value functions. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 191, 416-436 (2008) · Zbl 1147.90013 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2007.08.013 |
| [148] | Greco, S., Mousseau, V., Slowinski, R.: Multiple criteria sorting with a set of additive value functions. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 207, 1455-1470 (2010) · Zbl 1206.91021 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2010.05.021 |
| [149] | Guo, S., Sanner, S.: Real-time multiattribute bayesian preference elicitation with pairwise comparison queries. In: AISTATS, pp. 289-296 (2010) |
| [150] | Halpern, J., Moses, Y.: Towards a theory of knowledge and ignorance: preliminary report. In: Proceedings of NMR’84, pp. 125-143 (1984) · Zbl 0806.03019 |
| [151] | Hansson, B.: An analysis of some deontic logics. Noûs 3, 373-398 (1969) · Zbl 1366.03069 · doi:10.2307/2214372 |
| [152] | Hansson, S.: Preference-Based Deontic Logic (PDL). J. Philos. Log. 19, 75-93 (1990) · Zbl 0698.03015 · doi:10.1007/BF00211186 |
| [153] | Harker, P.T., Vargas, L.G.: Reply to “remarks on the analytic hierarchy process” by j. s. dyer. Manag. Sci. 36(3), 269-273 (1990). http://www.jstor.org/stable/2631948 · doi:10.1287/mnsc.36.3.269 |
| [154] | Herbrich, R., Minka, T., Graepel, T.: Trueskilltm: a bayesian skill rating system. In: Proceedings of NIPS’06, pp. 569-576 (2006) · Zbl 0228.02012 |
| [155] | Israel, D.: What’s wrong with non-monotonic logic?. In: Proceedings of AAAI’80, pp. 99-101 (1980) |
| [156] | Israel, D.; Gabbay, DM (ed.); Hogger, CJ (ed.); Robinson, JA (ed.), The role(s) of logic in artificial intelligence, 1-31 (1993), Oxford · Zbl 0808.68027 |
| [157] | Jackson, F.: On the semantics and logic of obligation. Mind 94, 177-196 (1985) · doi:10.1093/mind/XCIV.374.177 |
| [158] | Jacquet-Lagrèze, E., Siskos, Y.: Assessing a set of additive utility functions for multicriteria decision making: the UTA method. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 10, 151-164 (1982) · Zbl 0481.90078 · doi:10.1016/0377-2217(82)90155-2 |
| [159] | Jacquet-Lagrèze, E., Siskos, Y.: Preference disaggregation: 20 years of MCDA experience. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 130, 233-245 (2001) · Zbl 1068.90566 · doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00035-7 |
| [160] | Joachims, T.: Optimizing search engines using clickthrough data. In: Proceedings of KDD’02, pp. 133-142 (2002) |
| [161] | Jones, A., Sergot, M.: Deontic logic in the representation of law: towards a methodology. Artif. Intell. Law 1, 45-64 (1992) · doi:10.1007/BF00118478 |
| [162] | Jones, A., Sergot, M.: On the characterisation of law and computer systems: the normative systems perspective. In: Meyer, J.J., Wieringa, R. (eds.) Deontic Logic in Computer Science. Wiley (1993) · Zbl 0914.68181 |
| [163] | Jørgensen, J.: Imperatives and logic. Erkenntnis 7, 288-296 (1938) |
| [164] | Kaci, S.: Refined preference-based argumentation frameworks. In: COMMA, pp. 299-310 (2010) · Zbl 0311.90007 |
| [165] | Kaci, S.: Working with preferences: Less is More. Springer, Berlin (2011) · Zbl 1239.68002 · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-17280-9 |
| [166] | Kaci, S., van der Torre, L.: Preference-based argumentation: arguments supporting multiple values. J. Approx. Reason. 48(3), 730-751 (2008) · Zbl 1184.68512 · doi:10.1016/j.ijar.2007.07.005 |
| [167] | Kaci, S., van der Torre, L.W.N., Weydert, E.: Acyclic argumentation: attack = conflict + preference. In: Proceedings of ECAI’06, pp. 725-726 (2006) |
| [168] | Kaci, S., van der Torre, L.: Reasoning with various kinds of preferences: logic, non-monotonicity, and algorithms. Ann. Oper. Res. 163, 89114 (2008) · Zbl 1172.03318 · doi:10.1007/s10479-008-0331-4 |
| [169] | Kacprzyk, J., Roubens, M.: Non Conventional Preference Relations in Decision Making. Springer Verlag, LNMES n. 301, Berlin (1988) · Zbl 0642.00025 |
| [170] | Kahneman, D., Tversky, A.: Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47, 263-291 (1979) · Zbl 0411.90012 · doi:10.2307/1914185 |
| [171] | Kakas, A., Moraitis, P.: Argumentation based decision making for autonomous agents. In: Proceedings of AAMAS’03, pp. 883-890 (2003) · Zbl 1068.90566 |
| [172] | Kaluzhny, Y., Muravitsky, A.: A knowledge representation based on the Belnap’s four valued logic. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 3, 189-203 (1993) · Zbl 0822.68107 · doi:10.1080/11663081.1993.10510807 |
| [173] | Keeney, R.L., Raiffa, H.: Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. Wiley, New York (1976) · Zbl 0488.90001 |
| [174] | Köbberling, V., Wakker, P.: Preference foundations for nonexpected utility: a generalized and simplified technique. Math. Oper. Res. 28, 395-423 (2003) · Zbl 1082.91042 · doi:10.1287/moor.28.3.395.16390 |
| [175] | Kok, E.M., Meyer, J.J.C., Prakken, H., Vreeswijk, G.: A formal argumentation framework for deliberation dialogues. In: Proceedings of ArgMAS’10, pp. 31-48 (2010) |
| [176] | Koons, R.; Zalta, EN (ed.), Defeasible reasoning (2009), Stanford |
| [177] | Kouvelis, P., Yu, G.: Robust Discrete Optimization and Its Applications. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1997) · Zbl 0873.90071 · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2620-6 |
| [178] | Krantz, D., Luce, R., Suppes, P., Tversky, A.: Foundations of Measurement, vol. 1: Additive and Polynomial Representations. Academic Press, New York (1971) · Zbl 0232.02040 |
| [179] | Kraus, S., Lehmann, D., Magidor, M.: Nonmonotonic reasoning, preferential models and cumulative logics. Artif. Intell. 44, 167-207 (1990) · Zbl 0782.03012 · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(90)90101-5 |
| [180] | Kraus, S., Sycara, K., Evenchik, A.: Reaching agreements through argumentation: a logical model and implementation. Artif. Intell. 104, 1-69 (1998) · Zbl 0908.68033 · doi:10.1016/S0004-3702(98)00078-2 |
| [181] | Labreuche, C., Huédé, F.L.: MYRIAD: a tool suite for MCDA. In: Proceedings of EUSFLAT’05, pp. 204-209 (2005) |
| [182] | Lafage, C., Lang, J.: Propositional distances and compact preference representation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 160, 741-761 (2005) · Zbl 1061.90083 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2003.06.037 |
| [183] | Lang, J.: Logical preference representation and combinatorial vote. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell. 42, 3771 (2004) · Zbl 1061.68147 · doi:10.1023/B:AMAI.0000034522.25580.09 |
| [184] | Lang, J.; Bouyssou, D. (ed.); Dubois, D. (ed.); Pirlot, M. (ed.); Prade, H. (ed.), Logical representation of preferences, 321-363 (2009), New York · doi:10.1002/9780470611876.ch7 |
| [185] | Lang, J., Mengin, J., Xia, L.: Aggregating conditionally lexicographic preferences on multi-issue domains. In: Proceedings of CP 2012, pp. 973-987 (2012) |
| [186] | Lehmann, D., Magidor, M.: Preferential logics: the predicate calculus case. In: Proceedings of TARK’90, pp. 57-72 (1990) · Zbl 0857.90004 |
| [187] | Lehmann, D., Magidor, M.: What does a conditional knowledge base entail? Artif. Intell. 55, 1-60 (1992) · Zbl 0762.68057 · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(92)90041-U |
| [188] | Lewis, D.; Stunland, S. (ed.), Semantic analysis for dyadic deontic logic, 1-14 (1974), Dordrecht · Zbl 0331.02013 · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-2191-3_1 |
| [189] | Lifschitz, V.: Computing circumscription. In: Proceedings of IJCAI’85, pp. 121-127 (1985) |
| [190] | Lifschitz, V.; Ginsberg, M. (ed.), Pointwise circumscription, 179-193 (1987), San Francisco |
| [191] | Lootsma, F.: Multi-criteria Decision Analysis Via Ratio and Difference Judgement. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1999) · Zbl 0939.91029 · doi:10.1007/b102374 |
| [192] | Loui, R.: Defeat among arguments: a system of defeasible inference. Comput. Intell. 2, 100-106 (1987) · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8640.1987.tb00178.x |
| [193] | Lu, T., Boutilier, C.: Learning mallows models with pairwise preferences. In: Proceedings of ICML’11, pp. 145-152 (2011) · Zbl 1137.91350 |
| [194] | Lu, T., Boutilier, C.: Robust approximation and incremental elicitation in voting protocols. In: IJCAI 2011, Proceedings of the 22nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain, July 16-22, 2011, pp. 287-293 (2011) · Zbl 1214.68277 |
| [195] | Makinson, D.: General theory of cumulative inference. In: Reinfrank, M., de Kleer, J., Ginsberg, M., Sandewall, R. (eds.) Non-Monotonic Reasoning, LNCS 346, pp. 1-18. Springer, Berlin (1989) · Zbl 0675.03007 |
| [196] | Mally, E.: Grundgesetze des Sollens. Elemente der Logik des Willens. Graz: Leuschner & Leubensky (1926) · Zbl 0209.00701 |
| [197] | Marchant, T.: Towards a theory of MCDM: stepping away from social choice theory. Math. Soc. Sci. 45, 343-363 (2003) · Zbl 1026.90048 · doi:10.1016/S0165-4896(02)00069-0 |
| [198] | Marichal, J.L., Meyer, P., Roubens, M.: Sorting multi-attribute alternatives: the TOMASO method. Comput. Oper. Res. 32, 861-877 (2005) · Zbl 1071.90550 · doi:10.1016/j.cor.2003.09.002 |
| [199] | Marquis, S., Lang, J., Liberatore, P., Marquis, P.: Expressive power and succinctness of propositional languages for preference representation. In: Proceedings of KR’04, pp. 203-212 (2004) |
| [200] | McCarthy, J.: Circumscription: a form of nonmonotonic reasoning. Artif. Intell. 13, 27-39 (1980) · Zbl 0435.68073 · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(80)90011-9 |
| [201] | McCarthy, J.: Applications of circumscription to formalizing of commonsense knowledge. Artif. Intell. 28, 89-116 (1986) · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(86)90032-9 |
| [202] | McCarty, L.T.: Modalities over actions: 1. model theory. In: Proceedings of (KR’94), pp. 437-448. Morgan Kaufmann (1994) |
| [203] | McSherry, D., Stretch, C.: Automating the discovery of recommendation knowledge. In: Proceedings of IJCAI’05, pp. 9-14 (2005) |
| [204] | Minka, T.P.: Expectation propagation for approximate bayesian inference. In: Proceedings of UAI’01, pp. 362-369 (2001) |
| [205] | Modgil, S., Nested argumentation and its application to decision making over actions, 57-73 (2006), Berlin · Zbl 1236.68262 |
| [206] | Modgil, S.: Reasoning about preferences in argumentation framework. Artif. Intell. 173, 901-934 (2009) · Zbl 1192.68663 |
| [207] | Moore, R.: Semantic considerations on nonmonotonic logic. Artif. Intell. 25, 75-94 (1985) · Zbl 0569.68079 · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(85)90042-6 |
| [208] | Moretti, S., Öztürk, M., Tsoukiàs, A.: Preference modelling. In: Ehrgott, M., Greco, S., Figueira, J. (eds.) State of the Art in Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis. New revised version. Springer, Berlin (to appear) |
| [209] | Moretti, S., Tsoukiàs, A.: Ranking sets of possibly interacting objects using Shapley extensions. In: Proceedings of KR 12, pp. 199-209 (2012) |
| [210] | Nute, D.: Defeasible reasoning and decision support systems. Decis. Support. Syst. 4, 97-110 (1988) · doi:10.1016/0167-9236(88)90100-5 |
| [211] | Nute, D. (ed.): Defeasible Deontic Logic. Synthese Library 263. Kluwer (1997) · Zbl 0885.00033 |
| [212] | Orlovsky, S.: Decision making with a fuzzy preference relation. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1, 155-167 (1978) · Zbl 0396.90004 · doi:10.1016/0165-0114(78)90001-5 |
| [213] | Ovchinnikov, S.: Structure of fuzzy binary relations. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 6, 169-195 (1981) · Zbl 0464.04004 · doi:10.1016/0165-0114(81)90023-3 |
| [214] | Öztürk, M., Tsoukiàs, A.: Modelling uncertain positive and negative reasons in decision aiding. Decis. Support. Syst. 43, 1512-1526 (2007) · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2006.06.005 |
| [215] | Öztürk, M., Tsoukiàs, A.: Bipolar preference modelling and aggregation in decision support. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 23, 970-984 (2008) · Zbl 1153.68474 · doi:10.1002/int.20302 |
| [216] | Öztürk, M.; Tsoukiàs, A.; Vincke, Ph; Ehrgott, M. (ed.); Greco, S. (ed.); Figueira, J. (ed.), Preference modelling, 27-72 (2005), Berlin |
| [217] | Pearl, J.: Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo (1988) · Zbl 0746.68089 |
| [218] | Pearl, J.: System Z: A natural ordering of defaults with tractable applications to default reasoning. In: Proceedings of TARK’90, pp. 121-135 (1990) · Zbl 1209.68432 |
| [219] | Pearl, J., Geffner, H.: Probabilistic semantics for a subset of default reasoning. Technical Report CSD-8700XX, R-93-III, Computer Science Dept., UCLA (1988) |
| [220] | Peintner, B., Viappiani, P., Yorke-Smith, N.: Preferences in interactive systems: technical challenges and case studies. AI Mag. 29(4), 13-24 (2008) |
| [221] | Perelman, C.: Justice, Law and Argument. Reidel, Dordrecht (1980) · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-9010-4 |
| [222] | Perelman, C., Olbrechts-Tyteca, L.: The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame (1969) |
| [223] | Perny, P., Pirlot, M., Tsoukiàs, A.: Proceedings of ADT 2013. LNAI 8176. Springer, Berlin (2013) · Zbl 1277.90003 |
| [224] | Perny, P., Roy, B.: The use of fuzzy outranking relations in preference modelling. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 49, 33-53 (1992) · Zbl 0765.90003 · doi:10.1016/0165-0114(92)90108-G |
| [225] | Perny, P., Tsoukiàs, A.: On the continuous extension of a four valued logic for preference modelling. In: Proceedings of IPMU’98, pp. 302-309 (1998) |
| [226] | Pirlot, M., Vincke, P.: Semi Orders. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1997) · Zbl 0897.06002 |
| [227] | Pollock, J.: Knowledge and Justification. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1974) |
| [228] | Pollock, J.: Defeasible reasoning. Cogn. Sci. 11, 481-518 (1987) · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1104_4 |
| [229] | Prakken, H.: A tool in modelling disagreement in law: preferring the most specific argument. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 165-174 (1991) |
| [230] | Prakken, H.: An argumentation framework in default logic. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell. 9, 91-131 (1993) · Zbl 0866.03018 · doi:10.1007/BF01531263 |
| [231] | Prakken, H.: Coherence and flexibility in dialogue games for argumentation. J. Log. Comput. 15, 1009-1040 (2005) · Zbl 1092.03014 · doi:10.1093/logcom/exi046 |
| [232] | Prakken, H., Sartor, G.: Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 7, 25-75 (1997) · Zbl 0877.68019 · doi:10.1080/11663081.1997.10510900 |
| [233] | Price, R., Messinger, P.R.: Optimal recommendation sets: covering uncertainty over user preferences. In: Proceedings of AAAI’05, pp. 541-548 (2005) |
| [234] | Pu, P., Chen, L.: User-involved preference elicitation for product search and recommender systems. AI Mag. 29(4), 93-103 (2008) · Zbl 1043.03026 |
| [235] | Ramsey, F.; Braithwaite, RB (ed.), Foundations of mathematics and other logical essays (1931), London · JFM 57.0047.06 |
| [236] | Reiter, R.; Gallaire, H. (ed.); Minker, J. (ed.), Logic and dala bases, 55-76 (1978), New York · doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-3384-5_3 |
| [237] | Reiter, R.: A logic for default reasoning. Artif. Intell. 13, 81-132 (1980) · Zbl 0435.68069 · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(80)90014-4 |
| [238] | Rescher, N., The logic of preference, 287-320 (1968), Berlin · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-3546-9_15 |
| [239] | Rescher, N.: Introduction to Value Theory. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1969) · Zbl 0187.40901 |
| [240] | Roberts, F.: Measurement theory, with applications to Decision Making, Utility and the Social Sciences. Addison-Wesley, Boston (1979) · Zbl 0432.92001 |
| [241] | Roberts, F.: Computer science and decision theory. Ann. Oper. Res. 163, 209-253 (2008) · Zbl 1170.91303 · doi:10.1007/s10479-008-0328-z |
| [242] | Roberts, F., Tsoukiàs, A.: Special issue on computer science and decision theory. Ann. Oper. Res. 163, 270 (2008) |
| [243] | Rossi, F.; Della Riccia, G. (ed.); Dubois, D. (ed.); Kruse, R. (ed.); Lenz, H. (ed.), Constraints and preferences: modelling frameworks and multi-agent settings, 305-320 (2008), Berlin · doi:10.1007/978-3-211-85432-7_13 |
| [244] | Rossi, F., Tsoukiàs, A.: Proceedings of ADT 2009. LNAI 5783. Springer, Berlin (2009) · Zbl 1175.91012 |
| [245] | Rossi, F., Venable, K., Walsh, T.: mCP nets: representing and reasoning with preferences of multiple agents. In: Proceedings of AAAI’04, pp. 729-734 (2004) |
| [246] | Rossi, F., Venable, K., Walsh, T.: Preferences in constraint satisfaction and optimization. AI Mag. 29, 58-68 (2008) |
| [247] | Rossi, F., Venable, K., Walsh, T.: A short introduction to preferences Synthesis Lectures on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning. Morgan & Claypool (2011) · Zbl 1248.03046 |
| [248] | Roubens, M., Vincke, P.: Preference Modeling. LNEMS 250. Springer, Berlin (1985) · Zbl 0572.90001 · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-46550-5 |
| [249] | Roy, B.; Bell, D. (ed.); Keeney, R. (ed.); Raiffa, H. (ed.), Partial preference analysis and decision aid: The fuzzy outranking relation concept, 40-75 (1977), New York |
| [250] | Saaty, T.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process, Planning, Piority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New york (1980) · Zbl 0587.90002 |
| [251] | Saaty, T.L.: An exposition on the ahp in reply to the paper “remarks on the analytic hierarchy process”. Manag. Sci. 36(3), 259-268 (1990). http://www.jstor.org/stable/2631947 · doi:10.1287/mnsc.36.3.259 |
| [252] | Salo, A., Keisler, J., Morton, A.: Portfolio Management. Springer, Berlin (2011) · Zbl 1222.90004 |
| [253] | Samuelson, P.: Probability and the attempts to measure utility. Econ. Rev. 1, 117-126 (1950) |
| [254] | Sartor, G.: A formal model of legal argumentation. Ratio Juris 7, 212-226 (1994) · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9337.1994.tb00175.x |
| [255] | Savage, L.: The Foundations of Statistics. Wiley, New York (1954). Second revised edition, 1972 · Zbl 0055.12604 |
| [256] | Schweizer, B., Sclar, A.: Probabilistic Metric Spaces. North Holland, Amsterdam (1983) · Zbl 0546.60010 |
| [257] | Shoham, Y.: A semantical approach to nonmonotonic logics Proceedings of the Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, pp. 275-279 (1987) |
| [258] | Shoham, Y.: Nonmonotonic logics: meaning and utility. In: Proceedings of IJCAI’87, pp. 388-393 (1987) · Zbl 0603.39005 |
| [259] | Shoham, Y.: Reasoning About Change. MIT Press, Boston (1987) |
| [260] | Simari, G., Loui, R.: A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation. Artif. Intell. 53, 125-157 (1992) · Zbl 1193.68238 · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(92)90069-A |
| [261] | Sinz, C., Haag, A., Narodytska, N., Walsh, T., Gelle, E., Sabin, M., Junker, U., O’Sullivan, B., Rabiser, R., Dhungana, D., Grünbacher, P., Lehner, K., Federspiel, C., Naus, D.: Configuration. IEEE Intell. Syst. 22(1), 78-90 (2007) · doi:10.1109/MIS.2007.6 |
| [262] | Smith, T.: Legal expert systems: discussion of theoretical assumptions. Ph.D. thesis, University of Utrecht (1994) |
| [263] | Smyth, B., Case-based recommendation, 342-376 (2007), Berlin · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-72079-9_11 |
| [264] | Sycara, K.: Persuasive argumentation in negotiation. Theor. Decis. 28 (1990) |
| [265] | Tan, YH; van der Torre, L., How to combine ordering and minimizing in a deontic logic based on preferences, 216-232 (1996), Berlin · doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-1488-8_12 |
| [266] | Tanguiane, A.S.: Aggregation and Representation of Preferences. Springer, Berlin (1991) · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-76516-2 |
| [267] | Thomason, R.; Horty, J.; Reinfrank, M. (ed.); de Kleer, J. (ed.); Ginsberg, M. (ed.); Sandewall, E. (ed.), Logics for inheritance theory, 220-237 (1987), Berlin |
| [268] | van der Torre, L.: Reasoning about obligations: Defeasibility in preference-based deontic logic. Ph.D. thesis, Erasmus University Rotterdam (1997) · Zbl 0872.03011 |
| [269] | Toulmin, S.: The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1958) |
| [270] | Touretzky, D.S.: A skeptic’s menagerie: conflictors, preemptors, reinstaters, and zombies in nonmonotonic inheritance. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-91), pp. 478-483. Morgan Kaufmann (1991) · Zbl 0742.68060 |
| [271] | Touretzky, D.S., Horty, J.F., Thomas, R.H.: A clash of intuitions: the current state of nonmonotonic multiple inheritance systems. In: IJCAI-87, pp. 476-482. Morgan Kaufmann (1987) · Zbl 1234.68371 |
| [272] | Trotter, W.: Combinatorics and partially ordered sets. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore (1992) · Zbl 0764.05001 |
| [273] | Tsoukiàs, A.: Preference modelling as a reasoning process: a new way to face uncertainty in multiple criteria decision support systems. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 55, 309-318 (1991) · doi:10.1016/0377-2217(91)90201-6 |
| [274] | Tsoukiàs, A.: A first-order, four valued, weakly paraconsistent logic and its relation to rough sets semantics. Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences 12, 85-108 (2002) · Zbl 1204.03035 |
| [275] | Tsoukiàs, A.; Perny, P.; Vincke, P.; Bouyssou, D. (ed.); Jacquet-Lagrèze, E. (ed.); Perny, P. (ed.); Slowinski, R. (ed.); Vanderpooten, D. (ed.); Vincke, P. (ed.), From concordance/discordance to the modelling of positive and negative reasons in decision aiding, 147-174 (2002), Dordrecht · Zbl 1059.90088 · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-0843-4_7 |
| [276] | Tsoukiàs, A., Vincke, P.: A new axiomatic foundation of partial comparability. Theor. Decis. 39, 79-114 (1995) · Zbl 0856.90009 · doi:10.1007/BF01078870 |
| [277] | Tsoukiàs, A.; Vincke, P.; Climaco, J. (ed.), Extended preference structures in MCDA, 37-50 (1997), Berlin · Zbl 0893.90006 · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-60667-0_5 |
| [278] | Tsoukiàs, A., Vincke, P.: Double threshold orders: a new axiomatization. J. Multi-Criteria Decis. Anal. 7, 285-301 (1998) · Zbl 0910.90194 · doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1360(199809)7:5<285::AID-MCDA200>3.0.CO;2-Q |
| [279] | Turunen, E., Öztürk, M., Tsoukiàs, A.: Paraconsistent semantics for pavelka style fuzzysentential logic. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 161, 1926-1940 (2010) · Zbl 1205.03038 · doi:10.1016/j.fss.2009.12.017 |
| [280] | Uckelman, J.: Alice and Bob will fight: the problem of electing a committee in the presence of candidate interdependence. In: Proceedings of (MPREF’10), pp. 73-78 (2010) |
| [281] | van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: a modal logic approach to ceteris paribus preferences. J. Philos. Log. 38, 83125 (2009) · Zbl 1171.03009 |
| [282] | van Dalen, D.: Logic and Structure. Springer, Berlin (1983) · Zbl 0875.03080 · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-02382-2 |
| [283] | van Fraassen, B.: The logic of conditional obligation. J. Philos. Log. 1, 417-438 (1972) · Zbl 0246.02015 · doi:10.1007/BF00255570 |
| [284] | van Fraassen, B.: Values and the heart’s command. J. Philos. 70, 5-19 (1973) · doi:10.2307/2024762 |
| [285] | Viappiani, P., Boutilier, C.: Regret-based optimal recommendation sets in conversational recommender systems. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, pp. 101-108 (2009) · Zbl 0952.68134 |
| [286] | Viappiani, P., Boutilier, C.: Optimal bayesian recommendation sets and myopically optimal choice query sets. In: Proceedings of NIPS’10, pp. 2352-2360 (2010) |
| [287] | Viappiani, P., Kroer, C.: Robust optimization of recommendation sets with the maximin utility criterion. In: Proceedings of ADT’13, pp. 411-424 (2013) · Zbl 1406.91091 |
| [288] | von Neumann, J., Morgenstern, O.: Theory of games and economic behaviour, 2nd edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1947) · Zbl 1241.91002 |
| [289] | von Wright, G.: Deontic logic. Mind 60, 1-15 (1951) · doi:10.1093/mind/LX.237.1 |
| [290] | von Wright, G.: An Essay in Modal Logic. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1951) · Zbl 0043.00701 |
| [291] | von Wright, G.: The logic of Preference. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh (1963) · Zbl 0252.02023 |
| [292] | von Wright, G.; Hilpinen, R. (ed.), Deontic logic and the theory of conditions, 159-177 (1971), Dordrecht · Zbl 0224.02012 |
| [293] | von Wright, G.: The logic of preference reconsidered. Theor. Decis. 3, 140-169 (1972) · Zbl 0252.02023 · doi:10.1007/BF00141053 |
| [294] | Wagstaff, K.L., desJardins, M., Eaton, E.: Modelling and learning user preferences over sets. J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell. 22, 237-268 (2010) · Zbl 1209.68432 · doi:10.1080/09528130903119336 |
| [295] | Wang, T., Boutilier, C.: Incremental utility elicitation with the minimax regret decision criterion. In: Proceedings of IJCAI’03, pp. 309-316 (2003) |
| [296] | Wilson, N.: Consistency and constrained optimisation for conditional preferences. In: Proceedings of ECAI’04, pp. 888-894 (2004) |
| [297] | Wilson, N.: Extending CP-nets with stronger conditional preference statements. In: Proceedings of AAAI’04, pp. 735-741 (2004) |
| [298] | Wilson, N.: Efficient inference for expressive comparative preference languages. In: Proceedings of IJCAI’09, pp. 961-966 (2009) |
| [299] | Yaman, F.; Walsh, T.; Littman, M.; desJardins, M.; Fürnkranz, J. (ed.); Hüllermeier, E. (ed.), Learning lexicographic preference models, 251-272 (2011), Berlin · Zbl 1214.68307 |
| [300] | Yu, P.; Wan, W.; Lee, P.; Fürnkranz, J. (ed.); Hüllermeier, E. (ed.), Decision tree modeling for ranking data, 83-106 (2011), Berlin · Zbl 1214.68310 |
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.
