×

Rankin-Cohen brackets of Hilbert Hecke eigenforms. (English) Zbl 07920319

Summary: Over any fixed totally real number field with narrow class number one, we prove that the Rankin-Cohen bracket of two Hecke eigenforms for the Hilbert modular group can only be a Hecke eigenform for dimension reasons, except for a couple of cases where the Rankin-Selberg method does not apply. We shall also prove a conjecture of Freitag on the volume of Hilbert modular groups, and assuming a conjecture of Freitag on the dimension of the cuspform space, we obtain a finiteness result on eigenform product identities.

MSC:

11F41 Automorphic forms on \(\mbox{GL}(2)\); Hilbert and Hilbert-Siegel modular groups and their modular and automorphic forms; Hilbert modular surfaces
11F60 Hecke-Petersson operators, differential operators (several variables)
11F67 Special values of automorphic \(L\)-series, periods of automorphic forms, cohomology, modular symbols

References:

[1] Blasius, D., Hilbert Modular Forms and the Ramanujan Conjecture, 35-56, 2006, Wiesbaden: Friedr. Vieweg, Wiesbaden · Zbl 1183.11023
[2] Borwein, P.; Choi, S.; Rooney, B.; Weirathmueller, A., The Riemann Hypothesis: A Resource for the Afficionado and Virtuoso Alike, 2008, New York: Springer, New York · Zbl 1132.11047 · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-72126-2
[3] Choie, Y.; Kim, H.; Richter, OK, Differential operators on Hilbert modular forms, J. Number Theory, 122, 25-36, 2007 · Zbl 1127.11037 · doi:10.1016/j.jnt.2006.03.005
[4] Duke, W., When is the Product of Two Hecke Eigenforms an Eigenform? Number Theory in Progress, 737-741, 1999, Berlin: de Gruyter, Berlin · Zbl 0953.11017
[5] Freitag, E., Hilbert Modular Forms, 1990, Berlin: Springer, Berlin · Zbl 0702.11029 · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-02638-0
[6] Ghate, E., On monomial relations between Eisenstein series, J. Ramanujan Math. Soc., 15, 71-79, 2000 · Zbl 0966.11017
[7] Ghate, E., On products of eigenforms, Acta Arith., 102, 27-44, 2002 · Zbl 1028.11026 · doi:10.4064/aa102-1-3
[8] Hida, H., Elementary Theory of \(L\)-Functions and Eisenstein Series, 1993, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge · Zbl 0942.11024 · doi:10.1017/CBO9780511623691
[9] Johnson, ML, Hecke eigenforms as products of eigenforms, J. Number Theory, 133, 2339-2362, 2013 · Zbl 1285.11070 · doi:10.1016/j.jnt.2012.11.001
[10] Joshi, K.; Zhang, Y., Eigenform product identities for Hilbert modular forms, Math. Z., 293, 1161-1179, 2019 · Zbl 1472.11142 · doi:10.1007/s00209-018-2214-y
[11] Lanphier, D.; Takloo-Bighash, R., On Rankin-Cohen brackets of eigenforms, J. Ramanujan Math. Soc., 19, 253-259, 2004 · Zbl 1179.11012
[12] Meher, J., Some remarks on Rankin-Cohen brackets of eigenforms, Int. J. Number Theory, 8, 2059-2068, 2012 · Zbl 1287.11055 · doi:10.1142/S1793042112501175
[13] Neukirch, J., Algebraic Number Theory, 1999, Berlin: Springer, Berlin · Zbl 0956.11021 · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-03983-0
[14] Odlyzko, AM, Bounds for discriminants and related estimates for class numbers, regulators and zeros of zeta functions: a survey of recent results, Sém. Théor. Nombres Bordeaux, 2, 2, 119-141, 1990 · Zbl 0722.11054 · doi:10.5802/jtnb.22
[15] Shimura, G., The special values of the zeta functions associated with Hilbert modular forms, Duke Math. J., 45, 637-679, 1978 · Zbl 0394.10015 · doi:10.1215/S0012-7094-78-04529-5
[16] Thompson, J.G.: A finiteness theorem for subgroups of \({\rm PSL}(2,{\mathbb{R}})\) which are commensurable with \({\rm PSL}(2,{\mathbb{Z}})\), The Santa Cruz Conference on Finite Groups, pp. 533-555 (1980) · Zbl 0448.20044
[17] You, Y.; Zhang, Y., Finiteness of Hilbert eigenform product identities, Proc. Am. Math. Soc., 149, 573-581, 2021 · Zbl 1469.11110 · doi:10.1090/proc/15249
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.