Event-triggered leader-following consensus of non-linear multi-agent systems with switched dynamics. (English) Zbl 1432.93020
Summary: This study investigates the leader-following consensus problem for a class of switched non-linear multi-agent systems via event-triggered protocols, where the switching signal of each agent is different. Both centralised and decentralised event-triggered protocols are proposed for the switched non-linear multi-agent systems. The results are then extended to the self-triggered control cases, respectively. It is proved that the practical leader-following consensus can be achieved by designed protocols. Moreover, the feasibility of the proposed control schemes is further verified by excluding the Zeno behaviour. Finally, a numerical example is given to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.
MSC:
| 93A14 | Decentralized systems |
| 93C30 | Control/observation systems governed by functional relations other than differential equations (such as hybrid and switching systems) |
| 93C40 | Adaptive control/observation systems |
References:
| [1] | OhK.ParkM., and AnhH.: ‘A survey of multi‐agent formation control’, Automatica, 2015, 53, pp. 424-440 · Zbl 1371.93015 |
| [2] | ChenM.SuH., and WangX.et al.: ‘Optimal leader allocation in UAV formation pairs ensuring cooperation’, Automatica, 2013, 49, (11), pp. 3189-3198 · Zbl 1358.93016 |
| [3] | GuoJ.RogersU., and LiX.et al.: ‘Secrecy constrained distributed detection in sensor networks’, IEEE Trans. Signal Inf. Process. Netw., 2017, 4, (2), pp. 378-391 |
| [4] | RichertD., and CortésJ.: ‘Co‐operative multi‐agent systems with engineering application’, IET Control Theory Appl., 2015, 9, (3), pp. 309-311 |
| [5] | TianL.ZhaoB., and WangL.: ‘Controllability of multi‐agent systems with periodically switching topologies and switching leaders’, Int. J. Control, 2018, 91, (5), pp. 1023-1033 · Zbl 1390.93159 |
| [6] | MaC.LiT., and ZhangJ.: ‘Consensus control for leader‐following multi‐agent systems with measurement noises’, J. Syst. Sci. Complex., 2010, 23, (1), pp. 35-49 · Zbl 1298.93028 |
| [7] | ValcherM., and ZorzanI.: ‘On the consensus of homogeneous multi‐agent systems with arbitrarily switching topology’, Automatica, 2017, 84, pp. 79-85 · Zbl 1376.93012 |
| [8] | Olfati‐SaberR., and MurrayR.M.: ‘Consensus problems in networks of agents with switching topology and time‐delays’, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 2004, 49, pp. 1520-1533 · Zbl 1365.93301 |
| [9] | HuJ., and LinY.S.: ‘Consensus control for multi‐agent systems with double‐integrator dynamics and time delays’, IET Control Theory Appl., 2010, 4, (11), pp. 109-118 |
| [10] | LiuW., and HuangJ.: ‘Adaptive leader‐following consensus for a class of higher‐order nonlinear multi‐agent systems with directed switching networks’, Automatica, 2017, 79, pp. 84-92 · Zbl 1371.93108 |
| [11] | ChengL.WangY., and RenW.et al.: ‘On convergence rate of leader‐following consensus of linear multi‐agent systems with communication noises’, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 2016, 61, (11), pp. 3586-3592 · Zbl 1359.93172 |
| [12] | CaoW.ZhangJ., and RenW.: ‘Leader‐follower consensus of linear multi‐agent systems with unknown external disturbances’, Syst. Control Lett., 2015, 82, pp. 64-70 · Zbl 1327.93007 |
| [13] | XiaoF., and ChengT.: ‘Adaptive consensus in leader‐following networks of heterogeneous linear systems’, IEEE Trans. Control Netw. Syst., 2017, 11, (11), pp. 1715-1725 |
| [14] | DuH.ChengY., and HeY.et al.: ‘Second‐order consensus for nonlinear leader‐following multi‐agent systems via dynamic output feedback control’, Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control, 2016, 26, (2), pp. 329-344 · Zbl 1333.93005 |
| [15] | DingL., and ZhengW.: ‘Consensus tracking in heterogeneous nonlinear multi‐agent networks with asynchronous sampled‐data communication’, Syst. Control Lett., 2016, 96, pp. 151-157 · Zbl 1347.93011 |
| [16] | YuZ.HuangD., and JiangH.et al.: ‘Consensus of second‐order multi‐agent systems with nonlinear dynamics via edge‐based distributed adaptive protocols’, J. Franklin Inst., 2016, 353, (18), pp. 4821-4844 · Zbl 1349.93025 |
| [17] | HeP.LiY., and ParkJ.H.: ‘Noise tolerance leader‐following of high‐order nonlinear dynamical multi‐agent systems with switching topology and communication delay’, J. Franklin Inst., 2016, 353, (1), pp. 108-143 · Zbl 1395.93014 |
| [18] | ZhangZ.ZhangL., and HaoF.et al.: ‘Leader‐following consensus for linear and Lipschitz nonlinear multi‐agent systems with quantized communication’, IEEE Trans. Cybern., 2017, 47, (8), pp. 1970-1982 |
| [19] | DolkV., and HeemelsM.: ‘Event‐triggered control systems under packet losses’, Automatica, 2017, 80, pp. 143-155 · Zbl 1370.93170 |
| [20] | WangJ.ZhangP., and NiW.: ‘Observer‐based event‐triggered control for consensus of general linear MASs’, IET Control Theory Appl., 2017, 11, (18), pp. 3305-3312 |
| [21] | SuH.WangZ., and SongZ.et al.: ‘Event‐triggered consensus of nonlinear multi‐agent systems with sampling data and time delay’, IET Control Theory Appl., 2017, 11, (11), pp. 1715-1725 |
| [22] | ChengT.KanZ., and KlotzJ.et al.: ‘Event‐triggered control of multi‐agent systems for fixed and time‐varying network topologies’, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 2017, 62, (10), pp. 5365-5371 · Zbl 1390.93024 |
| [23] | LiuD., and YangG.H.: ‘Event‐triggered control for linear systems with actuator saturation and disturbances’, IET Control Theory Appl., 2017, 11, (9), pp. 1351-1359 |
| [24] | XieD.XuS., and ChuY.et al.: ‘Event‐triggered average consensus for multi‐agent systems with nonlinear dynamics and switching topology’, J. Franklin Inst., 2015, 352, (3), pp. 1080-1098 · Zbl 1307.93258 |
| [25] | RenG., and YuY.: ‘Mean square consensus of stochastic multi‐agent systems with nonlinear dynamics by distributed event‐triggered strategy’, Int. J. Control, 2017, DOI: 10.1080/00207179.2017.1369572 · Zbl 1416.93186 |
| [26] | HuA., and CaoJ.: ‘Consensus of multi‐agent systems via intermittent event‐triggered control’, Int. J. Syst. Sci., 2017, 48, (2), pp. 280-287 · Zbl 1359.93019 |
| [27] | MaC., and QiaoH.: ‘Distributed asynchronous event‐triggered consensus of nonlinear multi‐agent systems with disturbances: an extended dissipative approach’, Neurocomputing, 2017, 243, pp. 103-114 |
| [28] | LiuL., and ShanJ.: ‘Event‐triggered consensus of nonlinear multi‐agent systems with stochastic switching topology’, J. Franklin Inst., 2017, 354, (13), pp. 5350-5373 · Zbl 1395.93018 |
| [29] | ZhaoM.PengC., and HeW.et al.: ‘Event‐triggered communication for leader‐following consensus of second‐order multi‐agent systems’, IEEE Trans. Cybern., 2017, 48, (6), pp. 1888-1897 |
| [30] | LiberzonD.: ‘Switching in systems and control’ (Birkhäuser, Boston, USA, 2003) · Zbl 1036.93001 |
| [31] | XiangW., and XiaoJ.: ‘Convex sufficient conditions on asymptotic stability and \(L_2\) gain performance for uncertain discrete‐time switched linear systems’, IET Control Theory Appl., 2014, 8, (3), pp. 211-218 |
| [32] | XiangW.TranH.D., and JohnsonT.T.: ‘Output reachable set estimation for switched linear systems and its application in safety verification’, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 2017, 62, (10), pp. 5380-5387 · Zbl 1390.93142 |
| [33] | ZhaiG.XuX., and DanielW.C.H.: ‘Stability of switched linear discrete‐time descriptor systems: a new commutation condition’, Int. J. Control, 2012, 85, (11), pp. 1779-1788 · Zbl 1401.93161 |
| [34] | YuanC., and WuF.: ‘Almost output regulation of switched linear dynamics with switched exosignals’, Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control, 2017, 27, (16), pp. 3197-3217 · Zbl 1386.93227 |
| [35] | SimoneB.GiorgioB., and EdoardoM.et al.: ‘Multi‐model unfalsified adaptive switching supervisory control’, Automatica, 2010, 46, pp. 249-259 · Zbl 1205.93005 |
| [36] | MengH.ChenZ., and MiddletonR.: ‘Consensus of multi‐agents in switching networks using input‐to‐state stability of switched systems’, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 2017, DOI: 10.1109/TAC.2018.2809454 · Zbl 1423.93328 |
| [37] | LiuT., and HuangJ.: ‘Cooperative output regulation for a class of nonlinear multi‐agent systems with unknown control directions subject to switching networks’, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 2018, 63, (3), pp. 783-790 · Zbl 1390.93107 |
| [38] | YuZ.JiangH., and HuangD.et al.: ‘Consensus of nonlinear multi‐agent systems with directed switching graphs: a directed spanning tree based error system approach’, Nonlinear Anal., Hybrid Syst., 2018, 28, pp. 123-140 · Zbl 1380.93029 |
| [39] | DaiJ., and GuoG.: ‘Exponential consensus of non‐linear multi‐agent systems with semi‐Markov switching topologies’, IET Control Theory Appl., 2017, 11, (18), pp. 3363-3371 |
| [40] | ZhangK.JiangB., and CocquempoV.: ‘Distributed fault estimation observer design for multi‐agent systems with switching topologies’, IET Control Theory Appl., 2017, 11, (16), pp. 2801-2807 |
| [41] | SuX.LiuX., and ShiP.et al.: ‘Sliding mode control of hybrid switched systems via an event‐triggered mechanism’, Automatica, 2018, 90, pp. 294-303 · Zbl 1387.93055 |
| [42] | XiangW., and JohnsonT.T.: ‘Event‐triggered control for continuous‐time switched linear systems’, IET Control Theory Appl., 2017, 11, (11), pp. 1694-1703 |
| [43] | LiT.F.FuJ., and DengF.et al.: ‘Stabilization of switched linear neutral systems: an event‐triggered sampling control scheme’, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 2018, DOI: 10.1109/TAC.2018.2797160 · Zbl 1423.93242 |
| [44] | QiY., and CaoM.: ‘Finite‐time boundedness and stabilisation of switched linear systems using event‐triggered controllers’, IET Control Theory Appl., 2017, 11, (18), pp. 3240-3248 |
| [45] | HuJ., and FengG.: ‘Distributed tracking control of leader‐follower multi‐agent systems under noisy measurement’, Automatica, 2010, 46, pp. 1382-1387 · Zbl 1204.93011 |
| [46] | HardyG.H.LittlewoodJ.E., and PolyaG.: ‘Inequalities’ (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1952) · Zbl 0047.05302 |
| [47] | ZhangT.GeS.S., and HuangC.: ‘Adaptive neural network control for strict‐feedback nonlinear systems using backstepping design’, Automatica, 2000, 36, (12), pp. 1835-1846 · Zbl 0976.93046 |
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.
