×

Modeling the transmission dynamics of Zika with sterile insect technique. (English) Zbl 1404.37106

Summary: A deterministic model for the transmission dynamics of Zika is designed and rigorously analysed. A model consisting of mutually exclusive compartments representing the human and mosquito dynamics takes into account both direct (human-human) and indirect modes of transmissions. The basic offspring number of the mosquito population is computed and condition for existence and stability of equilibria is investigated. Using the centre manifold theory, the model (with and without direct transmission) is shown to exhibit the phenomenon of backward bifurcation (where a locally asymptotically stable disease free equilibrium coexists with a locally asymptotically stable endemic equilibrium) whenever the associated reproduction number is less than unity. The study shows that the models with and without direct transmission exhibit the same qualitative dynamics with respect to the local stability of their associated disease-free equilibrium and backward bifurcation phenomenon. The main cause of the backward bifurcation is identified as Zika induced mortality in humans. Sensitivity (local and global) analysis of the model parameters are conducted to identify crucial parameters that influence the dynamics of the disease. Analysis of the model shows that an increase in the mating rate with sterile mosquito decreases the mosquito population. Numerical simulations, using parameter values relevant to the transmission dynamics of Zika are carried out to support some of the main theoretical findings.

MSC:

37N25 Dynamical systems in biology
92D30 Epidemiology
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] World Health Organization. Zika virus fact sheet. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/zika/en/ [Accessed 01 January, 2017].
[2] HayesEB. Zika virus outside africa. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15(9):1347‐1350.
[3] FoyBD, KobylinskiKC, FoyJLC, et al. Probable non‐vector‐borne transmission of Zika virus, Colorado, USA. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17(5):880‐882.
[4] FréourT, MiralliéS, HubertB, SplingartC, BarrièreP, MaquartM, Leparc‐GoffartI. Sexual transmission of Zika virus in an entirely asymptomatic couple returning from a Zika epidemic area, France, April 2016. Euro Surveill. 2016;21(23). pii = 30254. http://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2016.21.23.30254 [Accessed March, 2018]. · doi:10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2016.21.23.30254
[5] MussoD, RocheC, RobinE, et al. Potential sexual transmission of zika virus. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;21(2):359‐61.
[6] OliveiraMAS, MalingerG, XimenesR, et al. Zika virus intrauterine infection causes fetal brain abnormality and microcephaly: Tip of the iceberg. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;47(1):6‐7.
[7] Zika Virus Vaccine. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. //http://www.niaid.nih.gov/diseases‐conditions/zika‐vaccines [Accessed 23 August, 2018].
[8] AnguelovR, DumontY, LubumaJ. Mathematical modeling of sterile insect technology for control of anopheles mosquito. Comput Math Appl. 2012;64(3):374‐389. · Zbl 1252.92044
[9] DumontY, TchuencheJM. Mathematical studies on the sterile insect technique for the Chikungunya disease and Aedes albopictus. J Math Biol. 2012;65(25):809‐854. · Zbl 1311.92175
[10] KniplingEF. Possibilities of insect control or eradication through the use of sexually sterile males. J Econ Entomol. 1955;48(4):459‐462.
[11] OlivaCF, JacquetM, GillesJ, et al. The sterile insect technique for controlling populations of aedes albopictus (diptera: Culicidae) on reunion island: Mating vigour of sterilized males. PLoS one. 2012;7(11):e49414.
[12] BarclayHJ, Van Den DriesscheP. A sterile release model for control of a pest with two life stages under predation. Rocky Mountain J Math. 1990;20:847‐855. · Zbl 0718.92019
[13] EstevaL, YangHM. Mathematical model to assess the control of Aedes aegypti mosquitoes by sterile insect technique. Math Biosci. 2005;198(2):132‐147. · Zbl 1090.92048
[14] EstevaL, YangHM. Control of dengue vector by the sterile insect technique considering logistic recruitment. TEMA Tendncias em Matemtica Aplicada e Computacional. 2006;7(2):259‐268. · Zbl 1208.92043
[15] MaxianO, NeufeldA, TalisEJ, ChildsLM, BlackwoodJC. Zika Virus Dynamics: When Does Sexual Transmission Matter? Vol. 21; 2017;48‐55.
[16] D’OrtenzioE, MatheronS, YazdanpanahY, et al. Evidence of sexual transmission of zika virus. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(22):2195‐2198.
[17] BowmanC, GumelAB, Van Den DriesscheP, et al. Mathematical model for assessing control strategies against West Nile virus. Bull Math Biol. 2005;67(5):1107‐1133. · Zbl 1334.92392
[18] BrauerF, Castillo‐ChavezC, MubayiA, TowersS. Some models for epidemics of vector‐transmitted disease. Infectious Disease Model. 2016;1(1):79‐87.
[19] DanbabaUA, GarbaSM. Analysis of model for the transmission dynamics of Zika with sterile insect technique. In: R.Anguelov (ed.), M.Lachowicz (ed.), eds. Biomath Forum, Sofia, Mathematical Methods and Models in Biosciences. University British Columbia, Canada: GNU General Public License; 2018:81‐99. https://doi.org/10.11145/texts.2018.01.083 · Zbl 1404.92176 · doi:10.11145/texts.2018.01.083
[20] GarbaSM, GumelAB, Abu BakarMR. Backward bifurcation in dengue transmission dynamics. Math Biosci. 2008;215(1):11‐25. · Zbl 1156.92036
[21] NgwaGA, ShuWS. A mathematical model for endemic malaria with variable human and mosquito populations. Math Comput Model. 2008;32(7‐8):747‐763. · Zbl 0998.92035
[22] HolePI, KnolsBGJ, MalariaJ. 8 (Suppl. 2) (2009) S8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-8-s2-s8 (Accessed February, 2018). · doi:10.1186/1475-2875-8-s2-s8
[23] AgustoFB, BewickS, FaganWF. Mathematical model for Zika virus dynamics with sexual transmission route. Ecol Complex. 2017;29:61‐81.
[24] GaoD, LouY, HeD, et al. Prevention and control of Zika as a mosquito‐borne and sexually transmitted disease: A mathematical modeling analysis. Sci Rep. 2016;6:28070.
[25] ImranM, UsmanM, Dur‐e‐AhmadM, KhanA. Transmission dynamics of zika fever: A SEIR based model. Differ Equ Dyn Syst. 2017:1‐24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12591-017-0374-6 · Zbl 1479.34082 · doi:10.1007/s12591-017-0374-6
[26] Van Den DriesscheP, WatmoughJ. Reproduction numbers and sub‐threshold endemic equilibria for compartmental models of the disease transmission. Math Biosci. 2012;180(1):29‐48. · Zbl 1015.92036
[27] GarbaSM, GumelAB. Effect of cross‐immunity on the transmission dynamics of two strains of dengue. Int J Comput Math. 2010;87(10):2361‐2384. · Zbl 1198.92033
[28] GarbaSM, SafiMA. Mathematical analysis of west nile virus model with discrete delays. Acta Math Sci. 2013;33(5):1439‐1462. · Zbl 1299.37065
[29] Castillo‐ChavezC, SongB. Dynamical model of tuberculosis and their applications. Math Biosci Eng. 2004;1(2):361‐404. · Zbl 1060.92041
[30] ChitnisN, CushingJM, HymanJM. Bifurcation analysis of a Mathematical model for malaria transmission. J Soc Ind Appl Math. 2006;67(1):24‐45. · Zbl 1107.92047
[31] ChitnisN, HymanJM, ManoreCA. Modelling vertical transmission in vector‐borne diseases with application to Rift Valley fever. J Biol Dyn. 2013;7(1):11‐40. · Zbl 1447.92407
[32] MarinoS, HogueIB, RayCJ, KirschnerDE. A methodology for performing global uncertainty and sensitivity analysis in systems biology. J Theor Biol. 2008;254(1):178‐197. · Zbl 1400.92013
[33] ChitnisN, CushingJM, HymanJM. Determining important parameters in the spread of malaria through sensitivity analysis of a Mathematical model. Bull Math Biol. 2008;70(5):1272‐1296. · Zbl 1142.92025
[34] CoutinhoFAB, BurattiniMN, LopezLF, MassadE. Threshold conditions for a non‐autonomous epidemic system describing the population dynamics of dengue. Bull Math Biol. 2006;68(8):2263‐2282. · Zbl 1296.92226
[35] ClemonsA, MoriA, HaugenM, et al. Aedes aegypti Culturing and Egg Collection. Cold Spring Harbor protocols. (2010);pdb‐prot5507; 2010.
[36] DumontY, ChiroleuF, DomergC. On a temporal model for the Chikungunya disease: Modeling, theory and numerics. Math Biosci. 2008;213(1):80‐91. · Zbl 1135.92028
[37] DumontY, ChiroleuF. Vector control for the Chikungunya disease. Math Biosci Eng. 2010;7(2):313‐345. · Zbl 1259.92071
[38] NishiuraH, KinoshitaR, MizumotoK, et al. Transmission potential of Zika virus infection in the South Pacific. Int J Infect Dis. 2016;45:95‐97.
[39] AndraudM, HensN, MaraisC, BeutelsP. Dynamic epidemiological models for dengue transmission: A systematic review of structural approaches. PLoS one. 2012;7(11):e49085.
[40] KornGA, KornTM. Mathematical Handbook for Scientists and Engineers: Definitions, Theorems, and Formulas for Reference and Review.New York, USA: Courier Corporation; 2000.
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.