×

On the \(k\)-truck scheduling problem. (English) Zbl 1105.90025

Summary: Some results concerning the \(k\)-truck problem are produced. Firstly, the algorithms and their complexity concerning the off-line \(k\)-truck problem are discussed. Following that, a lower bound of competitive ratio (\(1+\theta)\cdot k/(\theta\cdot k+2)\) for the on-line \(k\)-truck problem is given, where \(\theta\) is the ratio of cost of the loaded truck and the empty truck on the same distance, and a relevant lower bound for the on-line \(k\)-taxi problem followed naturally. Thirdly, based on the Position Maintaining Strategy (PMS), some new results which are slightly better than those of W. Ma, Y. Xu and K. Wang [J. Glob. Optim. 21, 15–25 (2001; Zbl 1067.90048)] for general cases are obtained. For example, a \(c\)-competitive or (\(c/\theta +1/\theta +1\))-competitive algorithm for the on-line \(k\)-truck problem depending on the value of \(\theta\) , where \(c\) is the competitive ratio of some algorithm to a relevant \(k\)-server problem, is developed. The Partial-Greedy Algorithm (PG) is used as well to solve this problem on a line with \(n\) nodes and is proved to be a (\(1+(n-k)/\theta\))-competitive algorithm for this case. Finally, the concepts of the on-line \(k\)-truck problem are extended to obtain a new variant: Deeper On-line \(k\)-Truck Problem (DTP). We claim that results of PMS for the STP (Standard Truck Problem) hold for the DTP.

MSC:

90B35 Deterministic scheduling theory in operations research
68Q10 Modes of computation (nondeterministic, parallel, interactive, probabilistic, etc.)
68Q25 Analysis of algorithms and problem complexity
68W05 Nonnumerical algorithms

Citations:

Zbl 1067.90048
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Albers S., ACM Computing Surveys 31
[2] DOI: 10.1145/146585.146588 · Zbl 0799.68035 · doi:10.1145/146585.146588
[3] DOI: 10.1137/0404017 · Zbl 0726.68031 · doi:10.1137/0404017
[4] DOI: 10.1137/0220008 · Zbl 0716.68038 · doi:10.1137/0220008
[5] DOI: 10.1007/BFb0029561 · Zbl 1177.68009 · doi:10.1007/BFb0029561
[6] DOI: 10.1007/BF01762111 · Zbl 0645.68034 · doi:10.1007/BF01762111
[7] Kierstead H. A., Congressus Numerantium 33 pp 143–
[8] DOI: 10.1145/210118.210128 · Zbl 0885.68075 · doi:10.1145/210118.210128
[9] DOI: 10.1023/A:1017982528216 · Zbl 1067.90048 · doi:10.1023/A:1017982528216
[10] DOI: 10.1016/0196-6774(90)90003-W · Zbl 0705.68023 · doi:10.1016/0196-6774(90)90003-W
[11] DOI: 10.1145/2786.2793 · doi:10.1145/2786.2793
[12] DOI: 10.1137/1.9781611970265 · doi:10.1137/1.9781611970265
[13] DOI: 10.2307/2319522 · Zbl 0286.90020 · doi:10.2307/2319522
[14] Xu Y. F., Information 2
[15] DOI: 10.1145/322186.322187 · Zbl 0434.68053 · doi:10.1145/322186.322187
[16] Ying B. A., Navigation Computing Technology 31 pp 47–
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.