×

Empirical likelihood inference for the area under the ROC curve. (English) Zbl 1097.62099

Summary: For a continuous-scale diagnostic test, the most commonly used summary index of the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) is the area under the curve (AUC) that measures the accuracy of the diagnostic test. We propose an empirical likelihood (EL) approach for the inference on the AUC. First we define an EL ratio for the AUC and show that its limiting distribution is a scaled chi-square distribution. We then obtain an EL-based confidence interval for the AUC using the scaled chi-square distribution. This EL inference for the AUC can be extended to stratified samples, and the resulting limiting distribution is a weighted sum of independent chi-square distributions. Additionally we conduct simulation studies to compare the relative performance of the proposed EL-based interval with the existing normal approximation-based intervals and bootstrap intervals for the AUC.

MSC:

62N02 Estimation in survival analysis and censored data
62E20 Asymptotic distribution theory in statistics
62P10 Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis

References:

[1] Bamber, The area above the ordinal dominance graph and the area below the receiver operating characteristic curve graph, Journal of Mathematical Psychology 12 pp 387– (1975) · Zbl 0327.92017 · doi:10.1016/0022-2496(75)90001-2
[2] Hall, Methodology and algorithm of empirical likelihood, International Statistical Review 58 pp 109– (1990) · Zbl 0716.62003 · doi:10.2307/1403462
[3] Obuchowski, Sample size determination for diagnostic accuracy studies involving binomial ROC curve indices, Statistics in Medicine 16 pp 1529– (1997) · doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19970715)16:13<1529::AID-SIM565>3.0.CO;2-H
[4] Owen, Empirical likelihood ratio confidence regions, Annals of Statistics 18 pp 90– (1990) · Zbl 0712.62040 · doi:10.1214/aos/1176347494
[5] Owen, Empirical Likelihood (2001) · doi:10.1201/9781420036152
[6] Pepe, Statistical Evaluation of Diagnostic Tests and Biomarkers (2003)
[7] Pepe, The analysis of placement values for evaluating discriminatory measures, Biometrics 60 pp 528– (2004) · Zbl 1274.62173 · doi:10.1111/j.0006-341X.2004.00200.x
[8] Qin, Censored partial linear models and empirical likelihood, Journal of Multivariate Analysis 78 pp 37– (2001a) · Zbl 0978.62033 · doi:10.1006/jmva.2000.1944
[9] Qin, Empirical likelihood for censored linear regression, Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 28 pp 661– (2001b) · Zbl 1010.62060 · doi:10.1111/1467-9469.00261
[10] Qin, Empirical likelihood inference for median regression models of censored survival data, Journal of Multivariate Analysis 85 pp 416– (2003) · Zbl 1016.62112 · doi:10.1016/S0047-259X(02)00015-5
[11] Sen, A note on asymptotically distribution-free confidence bounds for P(X ! Y) based on two independent samples, Sankhyã, Series A 29 pp 95– (1967) · Zbl 0173.20903
[12] Stolz, Skin surface microscopy, Lancet 2 pp 864– (1989) · doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(89)93027-4
[13] Stolz, ABCD rule of dermatoscopy: A new practical method for early recognition of malignant melanoma, European Journal of Dermatology 4 pp 521– (1994)
[14] Tsimikas, Profile-likelihood inference for highly accurate diagnostic tests, Biometrics 58 pp 946– (2002) · Zbl 1210.62214 · doi:10.1111/j.0006-341X.2002.00946.x
[15] Wang, Empirical likelihood-based inference under imputation for missing response data, Annals of Statistics 30 pp 896– (2002a) · Zbl 1029.62040 · doi:10.1214/aos/1028674845
[16] Wang, Empirical likelihood-based inference in linear errors-in-covariables models with validation data, Biometrika 89 pp 345– (2002b) · Zbl 1019.62069 · doi:10.1093/biomet/89.2.345
[17] Wang, Semiparametric regression analysis with missing response at random, Journal of the American Statistical Association 99 pp 334– (2004) · Zbl 1117.62441 · doi:10.1198/016214504000000449
[18] Wolfe, On constructing statistics and reporting data, American Statistician 25 pp 27– (1971) · doi:10.2307/2682922
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.