×

Translating Hausdorff is hard: fine-grained lower bounds for Hausdorff distance under translation. (English) Zbl 07610223

Summary: Computing the similarity of two point sets is a ubiquitous task in medical imaging, geometric shape comparison, trajectory analysis, and many more settings. Arguably the most basic distance measure for this task is the Hausdorff distance, which assigns to each point from one set the closest point in the other set and then evaluates the maximum distance of any assigned pair. A drawback is that this distance measure is not translational invariant, that is, comparing two objects just according to their shape while disregarding their position in space is impossible.
Fortunately, there is a canonical translational invariant version, the Hausdorff distance under translation, which minimizes the Hausdorff distance over all translations of one of the point sets. For point sets of size \(n\) and \(m\), the Hausdorff distance under translation can be computed in time \(\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(nm)\) for the \(L_1\) and \(L_\infty\) norm [L. P. Chew and K. Kedem, “Improvements on geometric pattern matching problems”. In Otto Nurmi and Esko Ukkonen, editors, Algorithm Theory – SWAT ’92, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 318–325 (1992)] and \(\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(nm)(n+m))\) for the \(L_2\) norm [D. P. Huttenlocher et al., Discrete Comput. Geom. 9, No. 3, 267–291 (1993; Zbl 0770.68111)].
As these bounds have not been improved for over 25 years, in this paper we approach the Hausdorff distance under translation from the perspective of fine-grained complexity theory. We show (i) a matching lower bound of \((nm)^{1-o(1)}\) for \(L_1\) and \(L_\infty\) (and all other \(L_p\) norms) assuming the Orthogonal Vectors Hypothesis and (ii) a matching lower bound of \(n^{2-o(1)}\) for \(L_2\) in the imbalanced case of \(m=\mathcal{O}(1)\) assuming the 3SUM Hypothesis.

MSC:

68U05 Computer graphics; computational geometry (digital and algorithmic aspects)
68Q17 Computational difficulty of problems (lower bounds, completeness, difficulty of approximation, etc.)

Citations:

Zbl 0770.68111