×

Cheap talk with prior-biased inferences. (English) Zbl 1508.91090

Summary: We investigate how prior-biased inferences change players’ strategic incentives and result in novel welfare implications in the canonical framework of strategic information transmission. The ex ante social welfare achieved in our model exceeds the upper bound characterized in the standard environment without prior bias. The welfare gain stems from the fact that the receiver’s prior bias weakens the link between the sender’s message and the receiver’s response without contaminating the actual content of the messages. We further show that direct communication is optimal among all possible communication protocols in the presence of a sufficient degree of prior bias.

MSC:

91A28 Signaling and communication in game theory
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Abeler, J.; Nosenzo, D.; Raymond, C., Preferences for truth-telling, Econometrica, 87, 4, 1115-1153 (2019) · Zbl 1426.91081
[2] Alonso, R.; Rantakari, H., The art of brevity (2013), Working Paper
[3] Benjamin, D. J., Chapter 2 - Errors in probabilistic reasoning and judgment biases, (Handbook of Behavioral Economics: Applications and Foundations 1, vol. 2 (2019), North-Holland), 69-186
[4] Blume, A.; Board, O. J.; Kawamura, K., Noisy talk, Theor. Econ., 2, 4, 395-440 (2007)
[5] Blume, A.; DeJong, D. V.; Kim, Y.-G.; Sprinkle, G. B., Evolution of communication with partial common interest, Games Econ. Behav., 37, 1, 79-120 (2001) · Zbl 0989.91523
[6] Blume, A.; Lai, E. K.; Lim, W., Strategic information transmission: a survey of experiments and theoretical foundations, (Handbook of Experimental Game Theory (2020), Edward Elgar Publishing)
[7] Cai, H.; Wang, J. T.-Y., Overcommunication in strategic information transmission games, Games Econ. Behav., 56, 1, 7-36 (2006) · Zbl 1150.91008
[8] Cairney, P., The Politics of Evidence-Based Policymaking (2016), London
[9] Camerer, C., Individual decision making, (Handbook of Experimental Economics (1995), Princeton University Press)
[10] Chen, Y., Perturbed communication games with honest senders and naive receivers, J. Econ. Theory, 146, 2, 401-424 (2011) · Zbl 1282.91059
[11] Chen, Y.; Kartik, N.; Sobel, J., Selecting cheap-talk equilibria, Econometrica, 76, 1, 117-136 (2008) · Zbl 1132.91539
[12] Crawford, V. P.; Sobel, J., Strategic information transmission, Econometrica, 1431-1451 (1982) · Zbl 0494.94007
[13] Dickhaut, J. W.; McCabe, K. A.; Mukherji, A., An experimental study of strategic information transmission, Econ. Theory, 6, 3, 389-403 (1995) · Zbl 0840.90042
[14] Epstein, L. G., An axiomatic model of non-Bayesian updating, Rev. Econ. Stud., 73, 2, 413-436 (2006) · Zbl 1094.91016
[15] Eyster, E.; Rabin, M., Cursed equilibrium, Econometrica, 73, 5, 1623-1672 (2005) · Zbl 1133.91470
[16] Forges, F., Correlated equilibria in a class of repeated games with incomplete information, Int. J. Game Theory, 14, 3, 129-149 (1985) · Zbl 0591.90101
[17] Geller, E. S.; Pitz, G. F., Confidence and decision speed in the revision of opinion, Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform., 3, 2, 190-201 (1968)
[18] Gneezy, U., Deception: the role of consequences, Am. Econ. Rev., 95, 1, 384-394 (2005)
[19] Gneezy, U.; Kajackaite, A.; Sobel, J., Lying aversion and the size of the Lie, Am. Econ. Rev., 108, 2, 419-453 (2018)
[20] Goltsman, M.; Hörner, J.; Pavlov, G.; Squintani, F., Mediation, arbitration and negotiation, J. Econ. Theory, 144, 4, 1397-1420 (2009) · Zbl 1169.91009
[21] Gordon, S., On infinite cheap talk equilibria (2010), Working Paper
[22] Grether, D. M., Recent psychological studies of behavior under uncertainty, Am. Econ. Rev., 68, 2, 70-74 (1978)
[23] Grether, D. M., Testing Bayes rule and the representativeness heuristic: some experimental evidence, J. Econ. Behav. Organ., 17, 1, 31-57 (1992)
[24] Ivanov, M., Communication via a strategic mediator, J. Econ. Theory, 145, 2, 869-884 (2010) · Zbl 1238.91093
[25] Jehiel, P.; Koessler, F., Revisiting games of incomplete information with analogy-based expectations, Games Econ. Behav., 62, 2, 533-557 (2008) · Zbl 1142.91010
[26] Kahneman, D.; Tversky, A., Subjective probability: a judgment of representativeness, Cogn. Psychol., 3, 3, 430-454 (1972)
[27] Kahneman, D.; Tversky, A., On the psychology of prediction, Psychol. Rev., 80, 4, 237 (1973)
[28] Kartik, N., Strategic communication with lying costs, Rev. Econ. Stud., 76, 4, 1359-1395 (2009) · Zbl 1186.91046
[29] Kartik, N.; Lee, S.; Rappoport, D., Single-crossing differences on distributions (2019), Working Paper
[30] Kartik, N.; Ottaviani, M.; Squintani, F., Credulity, lies, and costly talk, J. Econ. Theory, 134, 1, 93-116 (2007) · Zbl 1156.91322
[31] Kawamura, K., Confidence and competence in communication, Theory Decis., 78, 2, 233-259 (2015) · Zbl 1377.91039
[32] King, A., Science, politics and policymaking: even though expert knowledge has become indispensible for policymaking, providing scientific advice to governments is not always easy, EMBO Rep., 17, 11, 1510-1512 (2016)
[33] Krishna, V.; Morgan, J., The art of conversation: eliciting information from experts through multi-stage communication, J. Econ. Theory, 117, 2, 147-179 (2004) · Zbl 1181.91041
[34] Lafky, J.; Lai, E. K.; Lim, W., Preferences vs. strategic thinking: an investigation of the causes of overcommunication, Games Econ. Behav., 136, 92-116 (2022)
[35] Melumad, N. D.; Shibano, T., Communication in settings with no transfers, Rand J. Econ., 22, 2, 173-198 (1991)
[36] Myerson, R. B., Game Theory (2013), Harvard University Press
[37] O’Donoghue, T.; Rabin, M., Doing it now or later, Am. Econ. Rev., 89, 1, 103-124 (March 1999)
[38] O’Donoghue, T.; Rabin, M., Studying optimal paternalism, illustrated by a model of sin taxes, Am. Econ. Rev., 93, 2, 186-191 (2003)
[39] Ortoleva, P., Modeling the change of paradigm: non-Bayesian reactions to unexpected news, Am. Econ. Rev., 102, 6, 2410-2436 (October 2012)
[40] Ottaviani, M.; Squintani, F., Naive audience and communication bias, Int. J. Game Theory, 35, 1, 129-150 (2006) · Zbl 1118.91027
[41] Pitz, G. F., An inertia effect (resistance to change) in the revision of opinion, Can. J. Psychol., 23, 1, 24 (1969)
[42] Pitz, G. F.; Downing, L.; Reinhold, H., Sequential effects in the revision of subjective probabilities, Can. J. Psychol., 21, 5, 381 (1967)
[43] Rabin, M., Psychology and economics, J. Econ. Lit., 36, 1, 11-46 (1998)
[44] Szalay, D., Strategic information transmission and stochastic orders (2012), Technical report, SFB/TR 15 Discussion Paper
[45] Wang, J. T.-y.; Spezio, M.; Camerer, C. F., Pinocchio’s pupil: using eyetracking and pupil dilation to understand truth telling and deception in sender-receiver games, Am. Econ. Rev., 100, 3, 984-1007 (2010)
[46] Weible, C. M.; Heikkila, T.; deLeon, P.; Sabatier, P. A., Understanding and influencing the policy process, Policy Sci., 45, 1, 1-21 (2012)
[47] Zhao, C., Representativeness and similarity (2016), Princeton University, Working Paper
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.