×

Certainty equivalent and utility indifference pricing for incomplete preferences via convex vector optimization. (English) Zbl 1461.91128

Summary: For incomplete preference relations that are represented by multiple priors and/or multiple – possibly multivariate – utility functions, we define a certainty equivalent as well as the utility indifference price bounds as set-valued functions of the claim. Furthermore, we motivate and introduce the notion of a weak and a strong certainty equivalent. We will show that our definitions contain as special cases some definitions found in the literature so far on complete or special incomplete preferences. We prove monotonicity and convexity properties of utility buy and sell prices that hold in total analogy to the properties of the scalar indifference prices for complete preferences. We show how the (weak and strong) set-valued certainty equivalent as well as the indifference price bounds can be computed or approximated by solving convex vector optimization problems. Numerical examples and their economic interpretations are given for the univariate as well as for the multivariate case.

MSC:

91B16 Utility theory
91B08 Individual preferences
91G15 Financial markets

References:

[1] Armbruster, B.; Delage, E., Decision making under uncertainty when preference information is incomplete, Manag. Sci., 61, 111-128 (2015) · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2014.2059
[2] Aumann, R., Utility theory without the completeness axiom, Econometrica, 30, 445-462 (1962) · Zbl 0121.15202 · doi:10.2307/1909888
[3] Benedetti, G.; Campi, O., Multivariate utility maximization with proportional transaction costs and random endowment, SIAM J. Control Optim., 50, 3, 1283-1308 (2012) · Zbl 1271.91059 · doi:10.1137/110831064
[4] Benson, HP, An outer approximation algorithm for generating all efficient extreme points in the outcome set of a multiple objective linear programming problem, J. Glob. Optim., 13, 1-24 (1998) · Zbl 0908.90223 · doi:10.1023/A:1008215702611
[5] Bewley, TF, Knightian decision theory: part 1, Decis. Econ. Finance, 25, 79-110 (2002) · Zbl 1041.91023 · doi:10.1007/s102030200006
[6] Birnbaum, MH; Yeary, S.; Luce, RD; Zhao, L., Empirical evaluation of four models of buying and selling prices of gambles, J. Math. Psychol., 75, 183-193 (2016) · Zbl 1396.91175 · doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2016.05.007
[7] Campi, L.; Owen, MP, Multivariate utility maximization with proportional transaction costs, Finance Stoch., 15, 3, 461-499 (2011) · Zbl 1303.91152 · doi:10.1007/s00780-010-0125-9
[8] Carmona, R., Indifference Pricing: Theory and Applications (2008), Princeton: Princeton University Press, Princeton · doi:10.1515/9781400833115
[9] Cheridito, P.; Kupper, M., Recursiveness of indifference prices and translation-invariant preferences, Math. Financ. Econ., 2, 3, 173-188 (2009) · Zbl 1255.91397 · doi:10.1007/s11579-009-0020-3
[10] Chudziak, J., On complementary symmetry under cumulative prospect theory, J. Math. Psychol., 95, 102312 (2020) · Zbl 1437.91201 · doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2019.102312
[11] Dubra, J.; Maccheroni, F.; Ok, E., Expected utility theory without the completeness axiom, J. Econ. Theory, 115, 118-133 (2004) · Zbl 1062.91025 · doi:10.1016/S0022-0531(03)00166-2
[12] Ehrgott, M.; Shao, L.; Schöbel, A., An approximation algorithm for convex multi-objective programming problems, J. Glob. Optim., 50, 3, 397-416 (2011) · Zbl 1242.90210 · doi:10.1007/s10898-010-9588-7
[13] Eichfelder, G., Adaptive scalarization methods in multiobjective optimization (2008), Berlin: Springer, Berlin · Zbl 1145.90001 · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-79159-1
[14] Galaabaatar, T.; Karni, E., Subjective expected utility with incomplete preferences, Econometrica, 81, 1, 255-284 (2013) · Zbl 1274.91187 · doi:10.3982/ECTA9621
[15] Hamel, A.; Löhne, A., Minimal element theorems and Ekeland’s principle with set relations, J. Nonlinear Convex Anal., 7, 1, 19-37 (2006) · Zbl 1100.58007
[16] Hamel, A.; Wang, SQ, A set optimization approach to utility maximization under transaction costs, Decis. Econ. Finance, 40, 1-2, 257-275 (2017) · Zbl 1398.91258 · doi:10.1007/s10203-017-0195-7
[17] Henderson, V.; Hobson, D., Indifference Pricing: Theory and Applications, Chapter Utility Indifference Pricing—An Overview, 44-74 (2009), Princeton: Princeton University Press, Princeton · Zbl 1158.91379
[18] Henderson, V.; Liang, G., A multidimensional exponential utility indifference pricing model with applications to counterparty risk, SIAM J. Control Optim., 54, 2, 690-717 (2016) · Zbl 1414.91375 · doi:10.1137/15M1040293
[19] Jahn, J., Vector Optimization—Theory, Applications, and Extensions (2004), Berlin: Springer, Berlin · Zbl 1055.90065
[20] Kabanov, Y.; Rásonyi, M.; Stricker, C., No-arbitrage criteria for financial markets with efficient friction, Finance Stoch., 6, 371-382 (2002) · Zbl 1026.60051 · doi:10.1007/s007800100062
[21] Kuroiwa, D.; Tanaka, T.; Ha, TXD, On cone convexity of set-valued maps, Nonlinear Anal. Theory Methods Appl., 30, 3, 1487-1496 (1997) · Zbl 0895.26010 · doi:10.1016/S0362-546X(97)00213-7
[22] Lewandowski, M., Complementary symmetry in cumulative prospect theory with random reference, J. Math. Psychol., 82, 52-55 (2018) · Zbl 1402.91133 · doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2017.11.004
[23] Löhne, A.; Rudloff, B., An algorithm for calculating the set of superhedging portfolios in markets with transaction costs, Int. J. Theor. Appl. Finance, 17, 2, 1450012 (2014) · Zbl 1293.91177 · doi:10.1142/S0219024914500125
[24] Löhne, A.; Rudloff, B.; Ulus, F., Primal and dual approximation algorithms for convex vector optimization problems, J. Glob. Optim., 60, 4, 713-736 (2014) · Zbl 1334.90160 · doi:10.1007/s10898-013-0136-0
[25] Luc, D.: Theory of Vector Optimization. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol. 319. Springer (1989)
[26] Nau, R., The shape of incomplete preferences, Ann. Stat., 34, 5, 2430-2448 (2006) · Zbl 1106.62001 · doi:10.1214/009053606000000740
[27] Nobakhtian, S.; Shafiei, N., A Benson type algorithm for nonconvex multiobjective programming problems, TOP, 25, 2, 271-287 (2017) · Zbl 1372.90085 · doi:10.1007/s11750-016-0430-3
[28] Ok, E., Utility representation of an incomplete preference relation, J. Econ. Theory, 104, 429-449 (2002) · Zbl 1015.91021 · doi:10.1006/jeth.2001.2814
[29] Ok, E.; Ortoleva, P.; Riella, G., Incomplete preferences under uncertainty: indecisiveness in beliefs versus tastes, Econometrica, 80, 4, 1791-1808 (2012) · Zbl 1274.91149 · doi:10.3982/ECTA8040
[30] Pagani, E.: Certainty equivalent: many meanings of a mean. Working Paper Series Department of Economics, University of Verona (2015)
[31] Pascoletti, A.; Serafini, P., Scalarizing vector optimization problems, J. Optim. Theory Appl., 42, 4, 499-524 (1984) · Zbl 0505.90072 · doi:10.1007/BF00934564
[32] Ruzika, S.; Wiecek, MM, Approximation methods in multiobjective programming, J. Optim. Theory Appl., 126, 3, 473-501 (2005) · Zbl 1093.90057 · doi:10.1007/s10957-005-5494-4
[33] Von Neumann, N.; Morgenstern, O., Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (1947), Princeton: Princeton University Press, Princeton · Zbl 1241.91002
[34] Wang, SQ, Utility. Junior Project (2010), Princeton: Princeton University, Princeton
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.