Innovation adoption and collective experimentation. (English) Zbl 1437.91338
Summary: I study learning about an innovation with costly information acquisition and knowledge sharing through a network. Agents situated in an arbitrary graph follow a myopic belief update rule. The network structure and initial beliefs jointly determine long-run adoption behavior. Networks that share information effectively converge on a consensus more quickly but are prone to errors. Consequently, dense or centralized networks have more volatile outcomes, and efforts to seed adoption should focus on individuals who are disconnected from one another. I argue that anti-seeding, preventing central individuals from experimenting early in the learning process, is an effective intervention because the population as a whole may gather more information.
MSC:
| 91D15 | Social learning |
| 91-05 | Experimental work for problems pertaining to game theory, economics, and finance |
References:
| [1] | Acemoglu, Daron; Dahleh, Munther; Lobel, Ilan; Ozdaglar, Asuman, Bayesian learning in social networks, Rev. Econ. Stud., 78, 1201-1236 (2011) · Zbl 1274.91354 |
| [2] | Bala, Venkatesh; Goyal, Sanjeev, Learning from neighbours, Rev. Econ. Stud., 65, 595-621 (1998) · Zbl 0910.90103 |
| [3] | Banerjee, Abhijit; Breza, Emily; Chandrasekhar, Arun; Duflo, Esther; Jackson, Matthew, Come Play With Me: Experimental Evidence of Information Diffusion about Rival Goods (2012), Working Paper |
| [4] | Banerjee, Abhijit; Chandrasekhar, Arun; Duflo, Esther; Jackson, Matthew, The diffusion of microfinance, Science, 341 (2013) |
| [5] | Bohren, Aislinn; Hauser, Daniel, Social Learning with Model Misspecification: a Framework and a Characterization (2018), Working Paper |
| [6] | Bolton, Patrick; Harris, Christopher, Strategic experimentation, Econometrica, 67, 349-374 (1999) · Zbl 1023.91500 |
| [7] | Bursztyn, Leonardo; Ederer, Florian; Ferman, Bruno; Yuchtman, Noam, Understanding mechanisms underlying peer effects: evidence from a field experiment on financial decisions, Econometrica, 82, 1273-1301 (2014) · Zbl 1419.91174 |
| [8] | Chandrasekhar, Arun; Larreguy, Horacio; Xandri, Juan Pablo, Testing Models of Social Learning on Networks: Evidence from a Framed Field Experiment (2016), NBER Working Paper No. 21468 · Zbl 1466.91224 |
| [9] | Conley, Timothy; Udry, Christopher, Learning about a new technology: Pineapple in Ghana, Am. Econ. Rev., 100, 35-69 (2010) |
| [10] | Dasaratha, Krishna; He, Kevin, Network Structure and Naïve Sequential Learning (2018), Working Paper · Zbl 1466.91225 |
| [11] | Duflo, Esther; Saez, Emmanuel, The role of information and social interactions in retirement plan decisions: evidence from a randomized experiment, Q. J. Econ., 118, 815-842 (2003) · Zbl 1072.91598 |
| [12] | Dupas, Pascaline, Short-run subsidies and long-run adoption of new health products: evidence from a field experiment, Econometrica, 82, 197-228 (2014) |
| [13] | Elliott, Matthew; Golub, Ben, A network approach to public goods, J. Polit. Econ, 127, 730-776 (2019) |
| [14] | Eyster, Erik; Rabin, Matthew; Weizsäecker, Georg, An Experiment on Social Mislearning (2015), Working Paper |
| [15] | Frick, Mira; Iijima, Ryota; Ishii, Yuhta, Misinterpreting Others and the Fragility of Social Learning (2018), Working Paper · Zbl 1466.91227 |
| [16] | Galeotti, Andrea; Goyal, Sanjeev, The law of the few, Am. Econ. Rev., 100, 1468-1492 (2010) |
| [17] | Galeotti, Andrea; Goyal, Sanjeev; Jackson, Matthew; Vega-Redondo, Fernando; Yariv, Leeat, Network games, Rev. Econ. Stud., 77, 218-244 (2010) · Zbl 1197.91168 |
| [18] | Golub, Ben; Jackson, Matthew, Naïve learning in social networks and the wisdom of crowds, Am. Econ. J. Microecon., 2, 112-149 (2010) |
| [19] | Golub, Ben; Jackson, Matthew, How homophily affects the speed of learning and best-response dynamics, Q. J. Econ., 127, 1287-1338 (2012) · Zbl 1400.91465 |
| [20] | Grimm, Veronika; Mengel, Friederike, Experiments on Belief Formation in Networks (2015), Working Paper · Zbl 1258.91048 |
| [21] | Jackson, Matthew; Rogers, Brian, Relating network structure to diffusion properties through stochastic dominance, B.E. J. Theor. Econ., 7 (2007) · Zbl 1169.91437 |
| [22] | Jackson, M.; Yariv, L., Diffusion of behavior and equilibrium properties in network games, Am. Econ. Rev., 97, 92-98 (2007) |
| [23] | Kempe, David; Kleinberg, Jon; Tardos, Eva, Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network, (KDD Conference Proceedings (2003)) · Zbl 1337.91069 |
| [24] | Kempe, David; Kleinberg, Jon; Tardos, Eva, Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network, Theory Comput., 11, 105-147 (2015) · Zbl 1337.91069 |
| [25] | Lobel, Ilan; Sadler, Evan, Information diffusion in networks through social learning, Theor. Econ., 10, 807-851 (2015) · Zbl 1395.91375 |
| [26] | Morris, Stephen, Contagion, Rev. Econ. Stud., 67, 57-78 (2000) · Zbl 0960.91016 |
| [27] | Mueller-Frank, Manuel; Neri, Claudia, Quasi-Bayesian Updating in Social Networks (2017), Working Paper |
| [28] | Munshi, Kaivan, Social learning in a heterogeneous population: technology diffusion in the Indian green revolution, J. Dev. Econ., 73, 185-213 (2004) |
| [29] | Salish, Mirjam, Learning Faster or More Precisely? Strategic Experimentation in Networks (2015), Working Paper |
| [30] | Sorensen, Alan, Social learning and health plan choice, Rand J. Econ., 37, 929-945 (2006) |
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.
