×

Sensitivity of the Rayleigh criterion in thermoacoustics. (English) Zbl 1430.76424

Summary: Thermoacoustic instabilities are one of the most challenging problems faced by gas turbine and rocket motor manufacturers. The key instability mechanism is described by the Rayleigh criterion. The Rayleigh criterion does not directly show how to alter a system to make it more stable. This is the objective of sensitivity analysis. Because thermoacoustic systems have many design parameters, adjoint sensitivity analysis has been proposed to obtain all the sensitivities with one extra calculation. Although adjoint sensitivity analysis can be carried out in both the time and the frequency domain, the frequency domain is more natural for a linear analysis. Perhaps surprisingly, the Rayleigh criterion has not yet been rigorously derived and comprehensively interpreted in the frequency domain. The contribution of this theoretical paper is threefold. First, the Rayleigh criterion is interpreted in the frequency domain with integral formulae for the complex eigenvalue. Second, the first variation of the Rayleigh criterion is calculated both in the time and frequency domain, both with and without Lagrange multipliers (adjoint variables). The Lagrange multipliers are physically related to the system’s observables. Third, an adjoint Rayleigh criterion is proposed. The paper also points out that the conclusions of the second author [“Sensitivity analysis of thermoacoustic instability with adjoint Helmholtz solvers”, Phys. Rev. Fluids 3, No. 11, Article ID 110509, 43 p. (2018; doi:10.1103/PhysRevFluids.3.110509)] apply to the first variation of the Rayleigh criterion, not to the Rayleigh criterion itself. The mathematical relations of this paper can be used to compute sensitivities directly from measurable quantities to enable optimal design.

MSC:

76Q05 Hydro- and aero-acoustics
76V05 Reaction effects in flows

Keywords:

gas dynamics

References:

[1] Aguilar, J. G., Magri, L. & Juniper, M. P.2017Adjoint-based sensitivity analysis of low order thermoacoustic networks using a wave-based approach. J. Comput. Phys.341, 163-181. · Zbl 1376.76061
[2] Brear, M. J., Nicoud, F., Talei, M., Giauque, A. & Hawkes, E. R.2012Disturbance energy transport and sound production in gaseous combustion. J. Fluid Mech.707, 53-73. · Zbl 1275.76221
[3] Camarri, S.2015Flow control design inspired by linear stability analysis. Acta Mechanica226 (4), 979-1010. · Zbl 1317.76040
[4] Candel, S.2002Combustion dynamics and control: progress and challenges. Proc. Combust. Inst.29, 1-28.
[5] Candel, S. M.1975Acoustic conservation principles and an application to plane and modal propagation in nozzles and diffusers. J. Sound Vib.41 (2), 207-232. · Zbl 0393.76049
[6] Chu, B. T.1965On the energy transfer to small disturbances in fluid flow (Part I). Acta Mechanica1 (3), 215-234.
[7] Dowling, A. P. & Morgans, A. S.2005Feedback control of combustion oscillations. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.37, 151-182. · Zbl 1117.76072
[8] George, K. J. & Sujith, R. I.2011On Chu’s disturbance energy. J. Sound Vib.330 (22), 5280-5291.
[9] George, K. J. & Sujith, R. I.2012Disturbance energy norms: a critical analysis. J. Sound Vib.331 (7), 1552-1566.
[10] Ghirardo, G., Juniper, M. P. & Moeck, J. P.2016Weakly nonlinear analysis of thermoacoustic instabilities in annular combustors. J. Fluid Mech.805, 52-87. · Zbl 1454.80010
[11] Greiner, W. & Reinhardt, G.1996Field Quantization. Springer. · Zbl 0844.00006
[12] Juniper, M. P.2018Sensitivity analysis of thermoacoustic instability with adjoint Helmholtz solvers. Phys. Rev. Fluids3, 110509.
[13] Juniper, M. P. & Sujith, R. I.2018Sensitivity and nonlinearity of thermocoustic oscillations. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.50 (1), 661-689. · Zbl 1384.76050
[14] Karimi, N., Brear, M. J. & Moase, W. H.2008Acoustic and disturbance energy analysis of a flow with heat communication. J. Fluid Mech.597, 67-89. · Zbl 1170.76048
[15] Lieuwen, T. C. & Yang, V.2005Combustion Instabilities in Gas Turbine Engines: Operational Experience, Fundamental Mechanisms, and Modeling. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc.
[16] Lord Rayleigh1878The explanation of certain acoustical phenomena. Nature18, 319-321.
[17] Luchini, P. & Bottaro, A.2014Adjoint equations in stability analysis. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.46 (1), 493-517. · Zbl 1297.76068
[18] Magri, L.2019Adjoint methods as design tools in thermoacoustics. Appl. Mech. Rev.71 (2), 020801.
[19] Magri, L. & Juniper, M. P.2013Sensitivity analysis of a time-delayed thermo-acoustic system via an adjoint-based approach. J. Fluid Mech.719, 183-202. · Zbl 1284.76338
[20] Magri, L. & Juniper, M. P.2014Global modes, receptivity, and sensitivity analysis of diffusion flames coupled with duct acoustics. J. Fluid Mech.752, 237-265. · Zbl 1325.80006
[21] Myers, M. K.1991Transport of energy by disturbances in arbitrary steady flows. J. Fluid Mech.226, 383-400. · Zbl 0718.76039
[22] Nicoud, F. & Poinsot, T.2005Thermoacoustic instabilities: should the Rayleigh criterion be extended to include entropy changes?Combust. Flame142 (1-2), 153-159.
[23] Poinsot, T.2017Prediction and control of combustion instabilities in real engines. Proc. Combust. Inst.36 (1), 1-28.
[24] Sipp, D., Marquet, O., Meliga, P. & Barbagallo, A.2010Dynamics and control of global instabilities in open-flows: a linearized approach. Appl. Mech. Rev.63 (3), 030801.
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.