×

The impact of organic links in position auctions with popular versus niche keywords. (English) Zbl 1416.91128

Summary: We analyze a game-theoretic model to explore the impact of organic links (links generated by the search engine algorithm) and popular versus niche keywords on bidding strategies in sponsored link position auctions. In contrast to results in earlier literature, we find that with organic links the firm with the highest value per click does not necessarily win the first sponsored position; it may be optimal for a firm to bid an amount greater than the expected value from a click; and firms may choose not to bid even if they would incur no cost for clicks on the sponsored link.

MSC:

91B26 Auctions, bargaining, bidding and selling, and other market models
90B60 Marketing, advertising
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] AgarwalG., A.Goel, and R.Motwani (2006), Truthful auctions for pricing search keywords, Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, New York: ACM.
[2] AgarwalA., K.Hosanagar, and M. D.Smith (2008), Location, location, location: An analysis of profitability of position in online advertising markets, Journal of Marketing Research48, 1057-73.
[3] AgarwalA., K.Hosanagar, and M. D.Smith (2015), Do organic results help or hurt sponsored search performance?Information Systems Research26, 695-713.
[4] AnimeshA., V.Ramachandran, and S.Viswanathan (2010), Quality uncertainty and the performance of online sponsored search markets: An empirical investigation, Information Systems Research21, 190-201.
[5] AtheyS., and G.Ellison (2011), Position auctions with consumer search, Quarterly Journal of Economics126, 1213-70. · Zbl 1222.91019
[6] ChenJ., D.Liu, and A. B.Whinston (2009), Auctioning keywords in online search, Journal of Marketing73, 125-141.
[7] ChiouL., and C.Tucker (2012), How does the use of trademarks by third‐party sellers affect online search?Marketing Science31, 819-37.
[8] DharV., and A.Ghose (2010), Market efficiency in sponsored search, Information Systems Research21, 760-72.
[9] EdelmanB., and D. S.Gilchrist (2011), Advertising disclosures: Measuring labeling alternatives in internet search engines, Information Economics and Policy24, 75-89.
[10] EdelmanB., M.Ostrovsky, and M.Schwarz (2007), Internet advertising and the generalized second price auction: Selling billions of dollars worth of keywords, American Economic Review97, 242-59.
[11] EdelmanB., and M.Schwarz (2010), Optimal auction design and equilibrium selection in sponsored search auctions, American Economic Review100, 597-602.
[12] EvansD. S. (2008), The economics of the online advertising industry, Review of Network Economics7, 1-33.
[13] EvansD. S. (2011), The online advertising industry: Economics, evolution, and privacy, Journal of Economic Perspectives23, 37-60.
[14] GhoseA., and S.Yang (2009), An empirical analysis of search engine advertising: Sponsored search in electronic markets, Management Science55, 1605-22.
[15] GomesR., and K.Sweeney (2014), Bayes‐Nash equilibria of the generalized second‐price auction, Games and Economic Behavior86, 421-37. · Zbl 1296.91127
[16] JeziorskiP., and I.Segal (2015), What makes them click: Empirical analysis of consumer demand for search advertising, American Economic Journal: Microeconomics7, 24-53.
[17] KatonaZ., and M.Sarvary (2010), The race for sponsored links: Bidding patterns for search advertising, Marketing Science29, 199-215.
[18] MetrikovP., F.Diaz, S.Lahaie, and J.Rao (2014), Whole page optimization: How page elements interact with the position auction, Proceedings of the Fifteenth ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, 583-600, New York: ACM.
[19] MoonY., and C.Kwon (2011), Online advertisement service pricing and an option contract, Electronic Commerce Research and Applications10, 38-48.
[20] ReileyD., S.Li, and R.Lewis (2010), Northern exposure: A field experiment measuring externalities between search advertisements, Proceedings of the 11th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, 297-304, New York: ACM.
[21] RutzO., and R. E.Bucklin (2011), From generic to branded: A model of spillover in paid search advertising, Journal of Marketing Research48, 87-102.
[22] Taylor, G. (2011), The informativeness of online advertising, International Journal of Industrial Organization29, 668-77.
[23] Taylor, G. (2013), Search quality and revenue cannibalization by competing search engines, Journal of Economics & Management Strategy22, 445-67.
[24] Varian, H. (2007), Position auctions, International Journal of Industrial Organization25, 1163-78.
[25] White, A. (2013), Search engines: Left side quality versus right side profits, International Journal of Industrial Organization31, 690-701.
[26] XuL., J.Chen, and A.Whinston (2012), Effects of the presence of organic listing in search advertising, Information Systems Research4, 1284-302.
[27] YangS., and A.Ghose (2010), Analyzing the relationship between organic and sponsored search advertising: Positive, negative, or zero interdependence?Marketing Science29, 602-23.
[28] YaoS., and C. F.Mela (2011), A dynamic model of sponsored search advertising, Marketing Science30, 447-68.
[29] YeS., G.Aydin, and S.Hu (2014), Sponsored search marketing: Dynamic pricing and advertising for an online retailer, Management Science61, 1255-74.
[30] ZhangM., and J.Feng (2011), Cyclical bid adjustments in search‐engine advertising, Management Science57, 1703-19. · Zbl 1279.90086
[31] ZhuY., and K. C.Wilbur (2011), Hybrid advertising auctions, Marketing Science30, 612-27.
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.