×

Simultaneous selection of optimal bandwidths for the sharp regression discontinuity estimator. (English) Zbl 1398.62177

Summary: A new bandwidth selection method that uses different bandwidths for the local linear regression estimators on the left and the right of the cut-off point is proposed for the sharp regression discontinuity design estimator of the average treatment effect at the cut-off point. The asymptotic mean squared error of the estimator using the proposed bandwidth selection method is shown to be smaller than other bandwidth selection methods proposed in the literature. The approach that the bandwidth selection method is based on is also applied to an estimator that exploits the sharp regression kink design. Reliable confidence intervals compatible with both of the proposed bandwidth selection methods are also proposed as in the work of S. Calonico et al. [“Robust nonparametric confidence intervals for regression-discontinuity designs”, Econometrica 82, No. 6, 2295–2326 (2014; doi:10.3982/ecta11757)]. An extensive simulation study shows that the proposed method’s performances for the samples sizes 500 and 2000 closely match the theoretical predictions. Our simulation study also shows that the common practice of halving and doubling an optimal bandwidth for sensitivity check can be unreliable.

MSC:

62J05 Linear regression; mixed models
62K20 Response surface designs
62G15 Nonparametric tolerance and confidence regions

References:

[1] Abadie, A. and G. W.Imbens (2011), “Bias‐corrected matching estimators for average treatment effects.” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 29, 1-11. · Zbl 1214.62031
[2] Arai, Y. and H.Ichimura (2013), “Supplement to ‘Optimal bandwidth selection for differences of nonparametric estimators with an application to the sharp regression discontinuity design’.” Report.
[3] Arai, Y. and H.Ichimura (2016), “Optimal bandwidth selection for the fuzzy regression discontinuity estimator.” Economics Letters, 141, 103-106. · Zbl 1398.62204
[4] Calonico, S., M. D.Cattaneo, and M. H.Farrell (forthcoming), “On the effect of bias estimation on coverage accuracy in nonparametric inference.” Journal of the American Statistical Association. · Zbl 1398.62113
[5] Calonico, S., M. D.Cattaneo, and R.Titiunik (2014a), “Robust nonparametric bias‐corrected inference in the regression discontinuity design.” Econometrica, 82, 2295-2326. · Zbl 1410.62066
[6] Calonico, S., M. D.Cattaneo, and R.Titiunik (2014b), “Supplement to ‘Robust nonparametric confidence intervals for regression‐discontinuity design’.” Econometrica Supplemental Material, 82, http://dx.doi.org/10.3982/ECTA11757. · Zbl 1410.62066 · doi:10.3982/ECTA11757
[7] Calonico, S., M. D.Cattaneo, and R.Titiunik (2015), “rdrobust: An R package for robust inference in regression discontinuity design.” R Journal, 7, 38-51.
[8] Card, D., D. S.Lee, Z.Pei, and A.Weber (2015), “Inference on causal effects in a generalized regression kink design.” Econometrica, 83, 2453-2483. · Zbl 1410.62049
[9] Card, D., A.Mas, and J.Rothstein (2008), “Tipping and the dynamics of segregation.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123, 177-218.
[10] Cattaneo, M. D., R.Titiunik, and G.Vazquez‐Bare (2017), “Comparing inference approaches in RD designs: A reexamination of the effect of Head Start on Child Martality.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 36, 643-681. 10.1002/pam.21985
[11] Cheng, M. Y., J.Fan, and J. S.Marron (1997), “On automatic boundary corrections.” The Annals of Statistics, 25, 1691-1708. · Zbl 0890.62026
[12] Chiang, H. D. and Y.Sasaki (2016), “Causal inference by quantile regression kink designs.” Johns Hopkins University.
[13] DesJardins, S. L. and B. P.McCall (2008), “The impact of the Gates Millennium scholars program on the retention, college finance‐ and work‐related choices, and future educational aspirations of low‐income minority students.” Report.
[14] DiNardo, J. and D. S.Lee (2011), “Program evaluation and research designs.” In Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. 4A (O.Ashenfelter (ed.) and D.Card (ed.), eds.), 463-536, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
[15] Dong, Y. and A.Lewbel (2015), “Identifying the effect of changing the policy threshold in regression discontinuity models.” Review of Economics and Statistics, 97, 1081-1092.
[16] Fan, J. (1992), “Design‐adaptive nonparametric regression.” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87, 998-1004. · Zbl 0850.62354
[17] Fan, J. (1993), “Local linear regression smoothers and their minimax efficiencies.” The Annals of Statistics, 21, 196-216. · Zbl 0773.62029
[18] Fan, J. and I.Gijbels (1992), “Variable bandwidth and local linear regression smoothers.” The Annals of Statistics, 20, 2008-2036. · Zbl 0765.62040
[19] Fan, J. and I.Gijbels (1996), Local Polynomial Modeling and Its Applications. Chapman & Hall, Boca Raton, FL. · Zbl 0873.62037
[20] Fan, J., I.Gijbels, T.‐C.Hu, and L.‐S.Huang (1996), “A study of variable bandwidth selection for local polynomial regression.” Statistica Sinica, 6, 113-127. · Zbl 0840.62041
[21] Frandsen, B. R., M.Frörich, and B.Melly (2012), “Quantile treatment effects in the regression discontinuity design.” Journal of Econometrics, 168, 382-395. · Zbl 1443.62448
[22] Hahn, J., P.Todd, and W.Van der Klaauw (2001), “Identification and estimation of treatment effects with a regression‐discontinuity design.” Econometrica, 69, 201-209.
[23] Hinnerich, B. T. and P.Pettersson‐Lidbom (2014), “Democracy, redistribution, and political participation: Evidence from Sweden 1919-1938.” Econometrica, 82, 961-993.
[24] Ichimura, H. and P. E.Todd (2007), “Implementing nonparametric and semiparametric estimators.” In Handbook of Econometrics, Vol. 6 (J. J.Heckman (ed.) and E. E.Leamer (ed.), eds.), Chapter 74, 5369-5468, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
[25] Imbens, G. W. and K.Kalyanaraman (2009), “Optimal bandwidth choice for the regression discontinuity estimator.” IZA Discussion Paper 3995.
[26] Imbens, G. W. and K.Kalyanaraman (2012), “Optimal bandwidth choice for the regression discontinuity estimator.” Review of Economic Studies, 79, 933-959. · Zbl 1409.62089
[27] Imbens, G. W. and T.Lemieux (2008), “Regression discontinuity designs: A guide to practice.” Journal of Econometrics, 142, 615-635. · Zbl 1418.62475
[28] Lee, D. S. (2008), “Randomized experiments from non‐random selection in U.S. house elections.” Journal of Econometrics, 142, 675-697. · Zbl 1418.62500
[29] Lee, D. S. and T.Lemieux (2010), “Regression discontinuity designs in economics.” Journal of Economic Literature, 48, 281-355.
[30] Ludwig, J. and D. L.Miller (2005), “Does Head Start improve children”s life changes? Evidence from a regression discontinuity design.” NBER Working Paper 11702.
[31] Ludwig, J. and D. L.Miller (2007), “Does Head Start improve children”s life changes? Evidence from a regression discontinuity design.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122, 159-208.
[32] Nielsen, H. S., T.Sørensen, and C.Taber (2010), “Estimating the effect of student aid on college enrollment: Evidence from a government grant policy reform.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 2, 185-215.
[33] Porter, J. (2003), “Estimation in the regression discontinuity model.” Report.
[34] Seifert, B. and T.Gasser (1996), “Finite‐sample variance of local polynomials: Analysis and solutions.” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91, 267-275. · Zbl 0871.62042
[35] Stone, C. J. (1977), “Consistent nonparametric regression.” The Annals of Statistics, 5, 595-645. · Zbl 0366.62051
[36] Thistlewaite, D. and D.Campbell (1960), “Regression‐discontinuity analysis: An alternative to the ex post facto experiment.” Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 309-317.
[37] Van der Klaauw, W. (2008), “Regression‐discontinuity analysis: A survey of recent developments in economics.” Labour, 22, 219-245.
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.