×

Choice theory when agents can randomize. (English) Zbl 1310.91056

The paper is devoted to choice theory under risk or uncertainty. The choice correspondencies generated by various axiomatic utility theories are considered. The author considers in this respect Choquet expected utility, maxmin expected utility, maxmin utility, and multiple prior expected utility. Relations to revealed preference are also investigated. All choice problems are closed under probabilistic mixture. Applications of the results to game theory and to statistical decision theory are described. Perspectives of further research are discussed in the concluding part of the paper.

MSC:

91B06 Decision theory
91B16 Utility theory
91A30 Utility theory for games
62C05 General considerations in statistical decision theory
Full Text: DOI

References:

[2] Anscombe, F. J.; Aumann, R. J., A definition of subjective probability, Ann. Math. Stat., 34, 199-205 (1963) · Zbl 0114.07204
[3] Arrow, K. J., Rational choice functions and orderings, Economica, 26, 121-127 (1959)
[4] Arrow, K. J.; Hurwicz, L., An optimality criterion for decision-making under ignorance, (Carter, C. F.; Ford, J. L., Uncertainty and Expectations in Economics: Essays in Honour of G.L.S. Shackle (1972), Basil Blackwell: Basil Blackwell Oxford)
[5] Aumann, R. J., Utility theory without the completeness axiom, Econometrica, 30, 445-462 (1962) · Zbl 0121.15202
[6] Bandhyopadhay, T.; Sengupta, K., Characterization of generalized weak orders and revealed preference, Econ. Theory, 3, 571-576 (2003) · Zbl 0819.90003
[7] Ballinger, T. P.; Wilcox, N., Decisions, error and heterogeneity, Econ. J., 107, 1090-1105 (1997)
[8] Berger, J. O., Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analysis (1985), Springer-Verlag · Zbl 0572.62008
[9] Bewley, T. F., Knightian decision theory. Part I, Decis. Econ. Finance, 25, 79-110 (2002) · Zbl 1041.91023
[10] Birnbaum, M. H.; Schmidt, U., An experimental investigation of violations of transitivity in choice under uncertainty, J. Risk Uncertainty, 37, 77-91 (2008) · Zbl 1152.91401
[11] Birnbaum, M. H.; Schmidt, U., Testing transitivity in choice under risk, Theory Dec., 69, 599-614 (2010)
[12] Camerer, C., An experimental test of several generalized expected utility theories, J. Risk Uncertainty, 2, 61-104 (1989)
[13] Caplin, A.; Dean, M., Search, choice, and revealed preference, Theoretical Econ., 6, 19-48 (2011) · Zbl 1231.91064
[14] Caplin, A.; Dean, M.; Martin, D., Search and satisficing, Amer. Econ. Rev., 101, 2899-2922 (2011)
[15] Chew, Soo Hong, A generalization of the quasilinear mean with applications to the measurement of income inequality and decision theory resolving the Allais paradox, Econometrica, 51, 1065-1092 (1983) · Zbl 0517.90009
[16] Dekel, E., An axiomatic characterization of preferences under uncertainty: weakening the independence axiom, J. Econ. Theory, 40, 304-318 (1986) · Zbl 0611.90007
[17] Dekel, E.; Lipman, B. L.; Rustichini, A., Representing preferences with a unique subjective state space, Econometrica, 69, 891-934 (2001) · Zbl 1026.91032
[18] Dekel, E.; Lipman, B. L.; Rustichini, A.; Sarver, T., Representing preferences with a unique subjective state space: a corrigendum, Econometrica, 75, 591-600 (2007) · Zbl 1132.91421
[19] Dominiak, A.; Schnedler, W., Attitudes toward uncertainty and randomization: an experimental study, Econ. Theory, 48, 289-312.2 (2011) · Zbl 1276.91041
[20] Dubra, J.; Maccheroni, F.; Ok, E. A., Expected utility theory without the completeness axiom, J. Econ. Theory, 115, 118-133 (2004) · Zbl 1062.91025
[21] Eliaz, K.; Ok, E. A., Indifference or indecisiveness? Choice-theoretic foundations of incomplete preferences, Games Econ. Behav., 56, 61-86 (2006) · Zbl 1151.91409
[22] Ellsberg, D., Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms, Quart. J. Econ., 75, 643-669 (1961) · Zbl 1280.91045
[23] Fishburn, P. C., Nontransitive measurable utility, J. Math. Psychol., 26, 31-67 (1982) · Zbl 0499.90006
[24] Fishburn, P. C.; LaValle, I. H., Context-dependent choice with nonlinear and nontransitive preferences, Econometrica, 56, 1221-1239 (1988) · Zbl 0657.90004
[25] Galaabaatar, T.; Karni, E., Subjective expected utility with incomplete preferences, Econometrica, 81, 255-284 (2013) · Zbl 1274.91187
[27] Gilboa, I.; Schmeidler, D., Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior, J. Math. Econ., 18, 141-153 (1989) · Zbl 0675.90012
[28] Gilboa, I.; Maccheroni, F.; Marinacci, M.; Schmeidler, D., Objective and subjective rationality in a multiple-prior model, Econometrica, 78, 755-770 (2010) · Zbl 1229.91103
[29] Gul, F.; Pesendorfer, W., Random expected utility, Econometrica, 74, 121-146 (2006) · Zbl 1112.91022
[30] Hayashi, T., Regret aversion and opportunity-dependence, J. Econ. Theory, 139, 242-268 (2008) · Zbl 1134.91013
[31] Herstein, I. N.; Milnor, J., An axiomatic approach to measurable utility, Econometrica, 21, 291-297 (1953) · Zbl 0050.36705
[32] Hirano, K., Decision theory in econometrics, (Durlauf, S. N.; Blume, L. E., The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics (2008), Palgrave Macmillan)
[33] Klibanoff, P., Characterizing uncertainty aversion through preference for mixtures, Soc. Choice Welfare, 18, 289-301 (2001) · Zbl 1069.91571
[35] Loomes, G.; Sugden, R., Testing different stochastic specifications of risky choice, Economica, 65, 581-598 (1998)
[36] Milnor, J., Games against nature, (Thrall, R. M.; Coombs, C. H.; Davis, R. L., Decision Processes (1954), Wiley: Wiley New York) · Zbl 0058.13702
[37] Ok, E. A.; Ortoleva, P.; Riella, G., Incomplete preferences under uncertainty: incompleteness in beliefs versus tastes, Econometrica, 80, 1791-1808 (2012) · Zbl 1274.91149
[38] Raiffa, H., Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms: comment, Quart. J. Econ., 75, 690-694 (1961)
[39] Richter, M. K., Revealed preference theory, Econometrica, 34, 635-645 (1966) · Zbl 0158.38802
[40] Richter, M. K., Rational choice, (Chipman, J. S.; Hurwicz, L.; Richter, M. K.; Sonnenschein, H. F., Preferences, Utility, and Demand: a Minnesota Symposium (1971), Harcourt Press) · Zbl 0277.90002
[41] Saito, K., Preference for flexibility and preference for randomization under ambiguity, Amer. Econ. Rev. (2014), in press
[42] Savage, L. J., The Foundations of Statistics (1954), Wiley: Wiley New York · Zbl 0055.12604
[43] Schmeidler, D., Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity, Econometrica, 57, 571-587 (1989) · Zbl 0672.90011
[44] Segal, U., Two-stage lotteries without the reduction axiom, Econometrica, 58, 349-377 (1990) · Zbl 0728.90013
[45] Sen, A. K., Choice functions and revealed preference, Rev. Econ. Stud., 38, 307-317 (1971) · Zbl 0237.90004
[46] Sen, A. K., Behaviour and the concept of preference, Economica, 40, 241-259 (1973)
[47] Seo, K., Ambiguity and second-order belief, Econometrica, 77, 1575-1605 (2009) · Zbl 1178.91053
[48] Szpilrajn, E., Sur l’extension de l’ordre partiel, Fundam. Math., 16, 386-389 (1930) · JFM 56.0843.02
[49] Starmer, C.; Sugden, R., Does the random-lottery incentive system elicit true preferences? An experimental investigation, Amer. Econ. Rev., 81, 971-978 (1991)
[50] Stoye, J., Statistical decisions under ambiguity, Theory Dec., 70, 129-148 (2011) · Zbl 1274.62074
[51] Stoye, J., Axioms for minimax regret choice correspondences, J. Econ. Theory, 146, 2226-2251 (2011) · Zbl 1229.91107
[52] Stoye, J., New perspectives on statistical decisions under ambiguity, Annu. Rev. Econ., 4, 257-282 (2012)
[53] Stoye, J., Dominance and admissibility without priors, Econ. Letters, 116, 118-120 (2012) · Zbl 1253.91066
[54] von Neumann, J.; Morgenstern, O., Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (1947), Princeton University Press · Zbl 1241.91002
[55] Wald, A., Statistical Decision Functions (1950), Wiley: Wiley New York · Zbl 0040.36402
[56] Wilcox, N. T., Stochastic models for binary discrete choice under risk: a critical primer and econometric comparison, Res. Exper. Econ., 12, 197-292 (2008)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.