×

Representing equilibrium aggregates in aggregate games with applications to common agency. (English) Zbl 1250.91060

Summary: An aggregate game is a normal-form game with the property that each player’s payoff is a function of only his own strategy and an aggregate of the strategy profile of all players. Such games possess properties that can often yield simple characterizations of equilibrium aggregates without requiring that one solves for the equilibrium strategy profile. When payoffs have a quasi-linear structure and a degree of symmetry, we construct a self-generating maximization program over the space of aggregates with the property that the solution set corresponds to the set of equilibrium aggregates of the original \(n\)-player game. We illustrate the value of this approach in common-agency games where the players’ strategy space is an infinite-dimensional space of nonlinear contracts. We derive equilibrium existence and characterization theorems for both the adverse selection and moral hazard versions of these games.

MSC:

91B40 Labor market, contracts (MSC2010)
91A40 Other game-theoretic models
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Acemoglu, D., Jensen, M., 2009. Aggregate comparative statics. Working paper.; Acemoglu, D., Jensen, M., 2009. Aggregate comparative statics. Working paper. · Zbl 1281.91011
[2] Aliprantis, C.; Border, K., Infinite Dimensional Analysis: A Hitchhikerʼs Guide (2006), Springer: Springer Berlin · Zbl 1156.46001
[3] Bergstrom, T.; Blume, L.; Varian, H., On the private provision of public goods, J. Publ. Econ., 29, 25-49 (1986)
[4] Bernheim, D.; Whinston, M., Common agency, Econometrica, 54, 923-942 (1986) · Zbl 0605.90028
[5] Bernheim, D.; Whinston, M., Menu auctions, resource allocations and economic influence, Quart. J. Econ., 101, 1-31 (1986) · Zbl 0586.90108
[6] Carlier, G., A general existence result for the principal-agent problem with adverse selection, J. Math. Econ., 35, 129-150 (2001) · Zbl 0972.91068
[7] Carmona, G.; Fajardo, J., Existence of equilibrium in common agency games with adverse selection, Games Econ. Behav., 66, 749-760 (2009) · Zbl 1165.91310
[8] Corchon, L., Comparative statics for aggregative games: The strong concavity case, Math. Soc. Sci., 28, 151-165 (1994) · Zbl 0877.90091
[9] Cornes, R., Hartley, R., 2000. Joint production games and share functions. Working paper.; Cornes, R., Hartley, R., 2000. Joint production games and share functions. Working paper.
[10] Cornes, R.; Hartley, R., Asymmetric contests with general technologies, Econ. Theory, 26, 923-936 (2005) · Zbl 1116.91009
[11] Dixit, A., The Making of Economic Policy (1996), MIT Press: MIT Press Cambridge
[12] Dubey, P.; Haimanko, O.; Zapehelnyuk, A., Strategic complements and substitutes, and potential games, Games Econ. Behav., 54, 77-94 (2006) · Zbl 1129.91004
[13] Fraysse, J., Common agency: Existence of an equilibrium in the case of two outcomes, Econometrica, 61, 1225-1229 (1993) · Zbl 0783.90016
[14] Gentzkow, M., Kamenica, E., 2011. Persuasion games. Working paper, University of Chicago Booth School of Business, March 2011.; Gentzkow, M., Kamenica, E., 2011. Persuasion games. Working paper, University of Chicago Booth School of Business, March 2011.
[15] Holmström, B., Milgrom, P., 1988. Common agency and exclusive dealing. Unpublished manuscript, Northwestern University.; Holmström, B., Milgrom, P., 1988. Common agency and exclusive dealing. Unpublished manuscript, Northwestern University.
[16] Innes, R., Limited liability and incentive contracting with ex-ante action choices, J. Econ. Theory, 52, 47-65 (1990) · Zbl 0716.90021
[17] Jahn, J., Introduction to the Theory of Nonlinear Optimization (2007), Springer-Verlag: Springer-Verlag Berlin · Zbl 1115.49001
[18] Jensen, M., Aggregative games and best-reply potentials, Econ. Theory, 43, 45-66 (2010) · Zbl 1185.91053
[19] Jost, J., Postmodern Analysis (2005), Springer-Verlag: Springer-Verlag Berlin · Zbl 1097.26004
[20] Kadan, O., Reny, P., Swinkels, J., 2011. Existence of optimal mechanisms in principal-agent problems. Working paper.; Kadan, O., Reny, P., Swinkels, J., 2011. Existence of optimal mechanisms in principal-agent problems. Working paper. · Zbl 1420.91227
[21] Kim, S. K., Limited liability and bonus contracts, J. Econ. Manag. Strategy, 6, 899-913 (1997)
[22] Klemperer, P.; Meyer, M., Supply function equilibria in oligopoly under uncertainty, Econometrica, 57, 1243-1277 (1989) · Zbl 0684.90008
[23] Kukushkin, N., A fixed-point theorem for decreasing mappings, Econ. Letters, 46, 23-26 (1994) · Zbl 0816.90140
[24] Kukushkin, N., Best response dynamics in finite games with additive aggregation, Games Econ. Behav., 48, 94-110 (2004) · Zbl 1117.91305
[25] Martimort, D., Multi-principaux avec anti-selection, Ann. Econ. Statist., 28, 1-38 (1992)
[26] Martimort, D.; Stole, L., The revelation and delegation principles in common agency games, Econometrica, 70, 1659-1674 (2002) · Zbl 1142.91613
[27] Martimort, D., Stole, L., 2010. Public contracting in intrinsic common-agency games. Revision of “Common agency games with common screening devices”, 2005. Working paper.; Martimort, D., Stole, L., 2010. Public contracting in intrinsic common-agency games. Revision of “Common agency games with common screening devices”, 2005. Working paper. · Zbl 1158.91426
[28] Martimort, D., Stole, L., 2011. Public contracting in delegated agency games. Working paper.; Martimort, D., Stole, L., 2011. Public contracting in delegated agency games. Working paper. · Zbl 1158.91426
[29] Monteiro, P., Page, F., 2005. Existence of Nash equilibrium in competitive nonlinear pricing games with adverse selection. Mimeo, Fundacao Getulio Vargas and University of Alabama.; Monteiro, P., Page, F., 2005. Existence of Nash equilibrium in competitive nonlinear pricing games with adverse selection. Mimeo, Fundacao Getulio Vargas and University of Alabama.
[30] Morris, S.; Ui, T., Best response equivalence, Games Econ. Behav., 49, 260-287 (2004) · Zbl 1102.91006
[31] Novshek, W., Finding all \(n\)-firm Cournot equilibria, Int. Econ. Rev., 25, 61-70 (1984) · Zbl 0533.90017
[32] Novshek, W., On the existence of Cournot equilibrium, Rev. Econ. Stud., 52, 85-98 (1985) · Zbl 0547.90011
[33] Okuguchi, K., Unified approach to Cournot models: oligopoly, taxation and aggregate provision of a pure public good, Europ. J. Polit. Economy, 9, 233-245 (1993)
[34] Page, F., Catalog competition and stable nonlinear prices, J. Math. Econ., 44, 822-835 (2008) · Zbl 1135.91350
[35] Page, F.; Monteiro, P., Three principles of competitive nonlinear pricing, J. Math. Econ., 39, 63-109 (2003) · Zbl 1113.91015
[36] Park, E.-S., Incentive contracting under limited liability, J. Econ. Manag. Strategy, 4, 477-490 (1995)
[37] Peters, M., Common agency and the revelation principle, Econometrica, 69, 1349-1372 (2001)
[38] Rochet, J.-C.; Chone, P., Ironing, sweeping and multidimensional screening, Econometrica, 66, 783-826 (1998) · Zbl 1015.91515
[39] Rogerson, W., The first-order approach to principal-agent problems, Econometrica, 53, 1357-1367 (1985) · Zbl 0576.90005
[40] Selten, R., Preispolitik der Mehrproduktenunternehmung in der statischen Theorie (1970), Springer-Verlag: Springer-Verlag Berlin · Zbl 0195.21801
[41] Simon, L.; Zame, W., Discontinuous games and endogenous sharing rules, Econometrica, 58, 861-872 (1990) · Zbl 0729.90098
[42] Stole, L., 1991. Mechanism design under common agency. Unpublished manuscript, University of Chicago.; Stole, L., 1991. Mechanism design under common agency. Unpublished manuscript, University of Chicago.
[43] Szidarovszky, F.; Yakowitz, S., A new proof of the existences and uniqueness of the Cournot equilibrium, Int. Econ. Rev., 18, 787-789 (1977) · Zbl 0368.90020
[44] Voorneveld, M., Best-response potential games, Econ. Letters, 66, 289-295 (2000) · Zbl 0951.91008
[45] Wilson, R., Nonlinear Pricing (1993), Oxford University Press
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.