×

In search of stars: network formation among heterogeneous agents. (English) Zbl 1188.91052

Summary: This paper reports results from a laboratory experiment on network formation among heterogeneous agents. The experimental design extends the V. Bala and S. Goyal [Econometrica 68, No. 5, 1181–1229 (2000; Zbl 1022.91047)] model of network formation with decay and two-way flow of benefits by introducing agents with lower linking costs or higher benefits to others. Furthermore, agents’ types may be common knowledge or private information. In all treatments, the (efficient) equilibrium network has a “star” structure. While equilibrium predictions fail completely with homogeneous agents, star networks frequently occur with heterogeneous agents. Stars are not born but rather develop: with a high-value agent, the network’s centrality, stability, and efficiency all increase over time. A structural econometric model based on best response dynamics and other-regarding preferences is used to analyze individual linking behavior. Maximum-likelihood estimates of the underlying structural parameters, obtained by pooling data from several treatments, allow us to explain the main treatment effects.

MSC:

91A90 Experimental studies
91D30 Social networks; opinion dynamics
91B69 Heterogeneous agent models

Citations:

Zbl 1022.91047

References:

[1] Bala, V.; Goyal, S., A non-cooperative model of network formation, Econometrica, 68, 1131-1230 (2000)
[2] Barabási, A.-L., Linked: The New Science of Networks (2002), Promeus
[3] Barabási, A.-L.; Albert, R., Emergence of scaling in random networks, Sci., 286, 286, 509-512 (1999) · Zbl 1226.05223
[4] Callander, S.; Plott, C., Principles of network development and evolution: An experimental study, J. Public Econ., 89, 1469-1495 (2005)
[5] Corbae, D.; Duffy, J., Experiments with network formation, Games Econ. Behav., 64, 81-120 (2008) · Zbl 1152.91376
[6] Falk, A., Kosfeld, M., 2005. It’s all about connections: Evidence on network formation. Working paper. University of Zürich; Falk, A., Kosfeld, M., 2005. It’s all about connections: Evidence on network formation. Working paper. University of Zürich
[7] Fehr, E.; Schmidt, K. M., A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation, Quart. J. Econ., 114, 817-868 (1999) · Zbl 0944.91022
[8] Freeman, L., Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification, Soc. Networks, 1, 215-239 (1979)
[9] Fudenberg, D.; Tirole, J., Game Theory (1991), MIT Press: MIT Press Cambridge, MA · Zbl 1339.91001
[10] Galeotti, A.; Goyal, S.; Kamphorst, J., Network formation with heterogeneous players, Games Econ. Behav., 54, 2, 353-372 (2006) · Zbl 1125.91006
[11] Goyal, S.; van der Leij, M.; Moraga-Gonzáles, J. L., Economics: An emerging small world, J. Polit. Economy, 114, 2, 403-412 (2006)
[12] Haller, H.; Sarangi, S., Nash networks with heterogeneous links, Math. Soc. Sci., 50, 181-201 (2005) · Zbl 1115.91041
[13] Haller, H.; Kamphorst, J.; Sarangi, S., (Non-)existence and scope of Nash networks, Econ. Theory, 31, 3, 597-604 (2007) · Zbl 1113.91042
[14] Jackson, M. O., A survey of models of network formation: Stability and efficiency, (Demange, G.; Wooders, M., Group Formation in Economics: Networks, Clubs and Coalitions (2004), Cambridge University Press: Cambridge University Press Cambridge)
[15] Jackson, M. O., The economics of social networks, (Blundell, R.; Newey, W.; Persson, T., Proceedings of the 9th World Congress of the Econometric Society (2005), Cambridge University Press: Cambridge University Press Cambridge) · Zbl 1303.91141
[16] Jackson, M. O.; Rogers, B., Meeting strangers and friends of friends: How random are socially generated networks?, Amer. Econ. Rev., 97, 3, 890-915 (2007)
[17] Jackson, M. O.; Wolinsky, A., A strategic model of social and economic networks, J. Econ. Theory, 71, 44-74 (1996) · Zbl 0871.90144
[18] Johnson, C.; Gilles, R. P., Spatial social networks, Rev. Econ. Design, 5, 273-299 (2000)
[19] Kosfeld, M., Economic networks in the laboratory: A survey, Rev. Network Econ., 3, 20-42 (2004)
[20] McBride, M., Position-specific information in social networks: Are you connected?, Math. Soc. Sci., 56, 283-295 (2008) · Zbl 1142.91730
[21] Newman, M. E.J., Coautorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration, Proceed. Nat. Acad. Sci., 101, 5200-5205 (2004)
[22] Wasserman, S.; Faust, K., Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications (1994), Cambridge University Press
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.