Review of coupling methods for non-matching meshes. (English) Zbl 1173.74485
Summary: Domain decomposition is nowadays a common way to speed up complex computations. However, the discrete meshes used in the different domains do not have to match at their common interface, especially when different physical fields are involved such as in fluid-structure interaction computations. Exchange of information over this interface is therefore no longer trivial. In this paper six methods that can deal with the information transfer between non-matching meshes in fluid-structure interaction computations are compared for different criteria. This is done for analytical test cases as well as a quasi-1D fluid-structure interaction problem. Two methods based on radial basis functions, one with compact support and one using thin plate splines, are favoured over the other methods because of their high accuracy and efficiency.
MSC:
| 74S99 | Numerical and other methods in solid mechanics |
| 76M99 | Basic methods in fluid mechanics |
| 74F10 | Fluid-solid interactions (including aero- and hydro-elasticity, porosity, etc.) |
| 74-02 | Research exposition (monographs, survey articles) pertaining to mechanics of deformable solids |
| 76-02 | Research exposition (monographs, survey articles) pertaining to fluid mechanics |
Software:
MpCCIReferences:
| [1] | Toselli, A.; Widlund, O., Domain decomposition methods - Algorithms and theory, (Springer Series in Computational Mathematics, vol. 34 (2005), Springer-Verlag) · Zbl 1069.65138 |
| [2] | Farhat, C.; Lesoinne, M.; Tallec, P., Load and motion transfer algorithms for fluid/structure interaction problems with non-matching discrete interfaces: Momentum and energy conservation, optimal discretization and application to aeroelasticity, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 157, 95-114 (1998) · Zbl 0951.74015 |
| [3] | Piperno, S.; Farhat, C.; Larrouturou, B., Partitioned procedures for the transient solution of coupled aroelastic problems. part I: Model problem, theory and two-dimensional application, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 124, 79-112 (1995) · Zbl 1067.74521 |
| [4] | Thévenza, P.; Blu, T.; Unser, M., Interpolation revisited, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, 19, 7, 739-758 (2000) |
| [5] | Cebral, J. R.; Löhner, R., Conservative load projection and tracking for fluid-structure problems, AIAA J., 35, 4, 687-692 (1997) · Zbl 0895.73077 |
| [6] | Löhner, R.; Yang, C.; Cebral, J.; Baum, J. D.; Luo, H.; Pelessone, D.; Charman, C., Fluid-structure interaction using a loose coupling algorithm and adaptive unstructured grids, (Hafez, M.; Oshima, K., Computational Fluid Dynamics Review (1995), John-Wiley) · Zbl 0875.73165 |
| [7] | Fraunhofer Institut for Algorithms and Scientific Computing SCAI, MpCCI, Mesh-based parallel Code Coupling Interface - Specification of MpCCI Version 2.0 (2003).; Fraunhofer Institut for Algorithms and Scientific Computing SCAI, MpCCI, Mesh-based parallel Code Coupling Interface - Specification of MpCCI Version 2.0 (2003). |
| [8] | Beckert, A.; Wendland, H., Multivariate interpolation for fluid-structure-interaction problems using radial basis functions, Aerospace Sci. Technol., 5, 2, 125-134 (2001) · Zbl 1034.74018 |
| [9] | Smith, M. J.; Cesnik, C. E.S.; Hodges, D. H., Evaluation of some data transfer algorithms for noncontiguous meshes, J. Aerospace Engrg., 13, 2, 52-58 (2000) |
| [10] | Smith, M. J.; Hodges, D. H.; Cesnik, C. E.S., Evaluation of computational algorithms suitable for fluid-structure interactions, J. Aircraft, 37, 2, 282-294 (2000) |
| [11] | Barlow, J., Constraint relationships in linear and nonlinear finite element analyses, Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg., 18, 521-533 (1982) · Zbl 0482.73058 |
| [12] | J.B. Ransom, A multifunctional interface method for coupling finite element and finite difference methods: Two dimensional scalar-field problems, Techical Report, AIAA-2002-1573 (2002).; J.B. Ransom, A multifunctional interface method for coupling finite element and finite difference methods: Two dimensional scalar-field problems, Techical Report, AIAA-2002-1573 (2002). |
| [13] | Park, K. C.; Felippa, C. A.; Rebel, G., A simple algorithm for localized construction of non-matching structural interfaces, Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg., 53, 2117-2142 (2002) · Zbl 1169.74653 |
| [14] | C. Bernardi, Y. Maday, A.T. Patera, A new nonconforming approach to domain decomposition: The mortar element method, Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations and their Applications, College de France Seminar, 1994.; C. Bernardi, Y. Maday, A.T. Patera, A new nonconforming approach to domain decomposition: The mortar element method, Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations and their Applications, College de France Seminar, 1994. · Zbl 0797.65094 |
| [15] | Laursen, T. A.; Heinstein, M. W., Consistent mesh tying methods for topologically distinct discretized surfaces in non-linear solid mechanics, Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg., 57, 1197-1242 (2003) · Zbl 1062.74618 |
| [16] | Simo, J. C.; Wriggers, P.; Taylor, R. L., A perturbed lagrangian formulation for the finite element solution of contact problems, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 50, 163-180 (1985) · Zbl 0552.73097 |
| [17] | Park, K. C.; Felippa, C. A.; Ohayon, R., Partitioned formulation of internal fluid-structure interaction problems by localized lagrange multipliers, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 190, 2989-3007 (2001) · Zbl 0983.74022 |
| [18] | Baaijens, F. P.T., A fictitious domain/mortar element method for fluid-structure interaction, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 35, 743-761 (2001) · Zbl 0979.76044 |
| [19] | Maman, N.; Farhat, C., Matching fluid and structure meshes for aeroelastic computations: A parallel approach, Comput. Struct., 54, 4, 779-785 (1995) |
| [20] | Hirsch, C., Numerical Computation of Internal and External Flows, (Fundamentals of Numerical Discretisation. Fundamentals of Numerical Discretisation, Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. I (1989), John-Wiley and Sons Ltd) |
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.
