×

On the similarity of identical twin fingerprints. (English) Zbl 1006.68919

Summary: Reliable and accurate verification of people is extremely important in a number of business transactions as well as access to privileged information. Automatic verification methods based on physical biometric characteristics such as fingerprint or iris can provide positive verification with a very high accuracy. However, the biometrics-based methods assume that the physical characteristics of an individual (as captured by a sensor) used for verification are sufficiently unique to distinguish one person from another. Identical twins have the closest genetics-based relationship and, therefore, the maximum similarity between fingerprints is expected to be found among identical twins. We show that a state-of-the-art automatic fingerprint verification system can successfully distinguish identical twins though with a slightly lower accuracy than nontwins.

MSC:

68U99 Computing methodologies and applications
68T10 Pattern recognition, speech recognition
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Jain, A. K.; Bolle, R.; Pankanti, S., BIOMETRICS: Personal Identification in Networked Society (1999), Kluwer: Kluwer New York
[2] D. Costello, Families: the perfect deception: identical twins, Wall Street J. Feb. 12th 1999.; D. Costello, Families: the perfect deception: identical twins, Wall Street J. Feb. 12th 1999.
[3] Problem identifications, http://onin.com/fp/problemidents.html; Problem identifications, http://onin.com/fp/problemidents.html
[4] Steen, R. G., DNA and Destiny: Nature and Nurture in Human Behavior (1996), Plenum Press: Plenum Press New York
[5] Segal, N. L., Entwined Lives: Twins and What They Tell Us About Human Behavior (2000), Plume: Plume New York
[6] M.D. Eibert, Human Cloning: Myths, Medical Benefits and Constitutional Rights, U &I Magazine, 1999, available at http://www.humancloning.org/users/infertil/humancloning.htm; M.D. Eibert, Human Cloning: Myths, Medical Benefits and Constitutional Rights, U &I Magazine, 1999, available at http://www.humancloning.org/users/infertil/humancloning.htm
[7] Veridicom, Inc., Fingerprint Authentication Technology Enabling Secure E-commerce, http://www.veridicom.com/; Veridicom, Inc., Fingerprint Authentication Technology Enabling Secure E-commerce, http://www.veridicom.com/
[8] E.P. Richards, Phenotype vs. Genotype: Why Identical Twins Have Different Fingerprints? http://www.forensic-evidence.com/site/ID_Twins.html; E.P. Richards, Phenotype vs. Genotype: Why Identical Twins Have Different Fingerprints? http://www.forensic-evidence.com/site/ID_Twins.html
[9] Jain, A. K.; Hong, L.; Pankanti, S.; Bolle, R., An identity authentication system using fingerprints, Proc. IEEE, 85, 9, 1365-1388 (1997)
[10] Galton, F., Finger Prints (1892), McMillan: McMillan London
[11] Roddy, A. R.; Stosz, J. D., Fingerprint features-statistical analysis and system performance estimates, Proc. IEEE, 85, 9, 1390-1421 (1997)
[12] Cummins, H.; Midlo, C., Fingerprints, Palms and Soles: An Introduction to Dermatoglyphics (1961), Dover Publications Inc: Dover Publications Inc New York
[13] W. Bodmer, R. McKie, The Book of Man: The Quest to Discover our Genetic Heritage, Viking, 1994.; W. Bodmer, R. McKie, The Book of Man: The Quest to Discover our Genetic Heritage, Viking, 1994.
[14] Daugman, J., Recognizing persons by their Iris patterns, (Jain, A. K.; Bolle, R.; Pankanti, S., BIOMETRICS: Personal Identification in Networked Society (1999), Kluwer Academic Publishers: Kluwer Academic Publishers New York) · Zbl 0991.68083
[15] Splitz, E.; Mountier, R.; Reed, T.; Busnel, M. C.; Marchaland, C.; Roubertoux, P. L.; Carlier, M., Comparative diagnoses of twin zygosity by SSLP variant analysis, questionnaire, and dermatoglyphics analysis, Behav. Genet., 26, 1, 56-63 (1996)
[16] Reed, T.; Carmelli, D.; Rosenman, R. H., Effects of placentation on selected type a behaviors in adult males, in the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) twin study, Behav. Genet., 21, 9-19 (1991)
[17] Reed, T.; Meier, R., Taking dermatoglyphic prints: a self-instruction manual, Am. Dermatoglyphics Assoc. Newslett., 9, Supp., 18 (1990)
[18] Press, W. H.; Teukolsky, S. A.; Vellerling, W. T.; Flannery, B. P., Numerical Recipes in C, The Art of Scientific Computing (1992), Cambridge University Press: Cambridge University Press Cambridge · Zbl 0845.65001
[19] NIST Special Database 9. NIST 8-bit Gray Scale Images of Fingerprint Image Groups (FIGS), http://www.nist.gov/srd/nistsd9.htm; NIST Special Database 9. NIST 8-bit Gray Scale Images of Fingerprint Image Groups (FIGS), http://www.nist.gov/srd/nistsd9.htm
[20] UK Biometric Working Group, Best Practices in Testing and Reporting Biometric Device Performance, Version 1.0, March 2000. http://www.afb.org.uk/bwg/bestprac10.pdf; UK Biometric Working Group, Best Practices in Testing and Reporting Biometric Device Performance, Version 1.0, March 2000. http://www.afb.org.uk/bwg/bestprac10.pdf
[21] J.L. Wayman, Multi-finger penetration rate and ROC variability for automatic fingerprint identification systems, Technical Report, San Jose State University, 1999.; J.L. Wayman, Multi-finger penetration rate and ROC variability for automatic fingerprint identification systems, Technical Report, San Jose State University, 1999.
[22] NIST Special Database 4. NIST 8-bit Gray Scale Images of Fingerprint Image Groups (FIGS), http://www.nist.gov/srd/nistsd4.htm; NIST Special Database 4. NIST 8-bit Gray Scale Images of Fingerprint Image Groups (FIGS), http://www.nist.gov/srd/nistsd4.htm
[23] Jain, A. K.; Prabhakar, S.; Hong, L.; Pankanti, S., Filterbank-based Fingerprint Matching, IEEE Trans. Image Process., 9, 5, 846-859 (2000)
[24] Simon Cole, The myth of fingerprints: A Forensic Science Stands Trial, http://www.linguafranca.com/print/0011/feature_fingerprints.html, 2000; Simon Cole, The myth of fingerprints: A Forensic Science Stands Trial, http://www.linguafranca.com/print/0011/feature_fingerprints.html, 2000
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.