×

On topological terms in the O(3) nonlinear sigma model. (English) Zbl 0987.81054

Summary: Topological terms in the \(O(3)\) nonlinear sigma model in \((1+1)\) and \((2+1)\) dimensions are re-examined based on the description of the SU(2)-valued field \(g\). We first show that the topological soliton term in \((1+1)\) dimensions arises from the unitary representations of the group characterizing the global structure of the symmetry inherent in the description, in a manner analogous to the appearance of the \(\theta\)-term in Yang-Mills theory in \((3+1)\) dimensions. We then present a detailed argument as to why the conventional Hopf term, which is the topological counterpart in \((2+1)\) dimensions and has been widely used to realize fractional spin and statistics, is ill-defined unless the soliton charge vanishes. We show how this restriction can be lifted by means of a procedure proposed recently, and provide its physical interpretation as well.

MSC:

81T10 Model quantum field theories

References:

[1] F. Wilczek, A. Zee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51 (1983) 25; Y.S. Wu, A. Zee, Phys. Lett. B 147 (1984) 325.; F. Wilczek, A. Zee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51 (1983) 25; Y.S. Wu, A. Zee, Phys. Lett. B 147 (1984) 325.
[2] M.J. Bowick, D. Karabali, L.C.R. Wijewardhana, Nucl. Phys. B 371 (1986) 417; D. Karabali, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 6 (1991) 1369.; M.J. Bowick, D. Karabali, L.C.R. Wijewardhana, Nucl. Phys. B 371 (1986) 417; D. Karabali, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 6 (1991) 1369.
[3] Semenoff, G. W.; Sodano, P., Nucl. Phys. B, 328, 753 (1989)
[4] Forte, S., Rev. Mod. Phys., 64, 193 (1992)
[5] Kobayashi, H.; Tsutsui, I.; Tanimura, S., Nucl. Phys. B, 514, 667 (1998) · Zbl 0947.81524
[6] Kimura, M.; Kobayashi, H.; Tsutsui, I., Nucl. Phys. B, 527, 624 (1998) · Zbl 0951.81090
[7] A.P. Balachandran, G. Marmo, B.S. Skagerstam, A. Stern, Classical Topology and Quantum States, World Scientific, Singapore, 1991.; A.P. Balachandran, G. Marmo, B.S. Skagerstam, A. Stern, Classical Topology and Quantum States, World Scientific, Singapore, 1991. · Zbl 0754.53058
[8] Balachandran, A. P.; Stern, A.; Trahern, G., Phys. Rev. D, 19, 2416 (1979)
[9] R. Jackiw, in: Current Algebras and Anomalies, World Scientific, Singapore, 1985.; R. Jackiw, in: Current Algebras and Anomalies, World Scientific, Singapore, 1985. · Zbl 0604.53042
[10] M. Henneaux, C. Teitelboim, Quantization of Gauge Systems, Princeton University Press, NJ, 1992.; M. Henneaux, C. Teitelboim, Quantization of Gauge Systems, Princeton University Press, NJ, 1992. · Zbl 0838.53053
[11] R. Bott, L.W. Tu, Differential Forms in Algebraic Topology, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1982.; R. Bott, L.W. Tu, Differential Forms in Algebraic Topology, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1982. · Zbl 0496.55001
[12] H. Otsu, H. Sato, Prog. Theor. Phys. 91 (1994) 1199; Z. Phys. C 64 (1994) 177.; H. Otsu, H. Sato, Prog. Theor. Phys. 91 (1994) 1199; Z. Phys. C 64 (1994) 177.
[13] S. Deser, R. Jackiw, S. Templeton, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48 (1982) 975; Ann. Phys. 140 (1982) 372.; S. Deser, R. Jackiw, S. Templeton, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48 (1982) 975; Ann. Phys. 140 (1982) 372.
[14] D’Hoker, E., Phys. Lett. B, 357, 539 (1995)
[15] Witten, E., Commun. Math. Phys., 92, 455 (1984) · Zbl 0536.58012
[16] E. D’Hoker, S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 605; E. D’Hoker, Nucl. Phys. B 451 (1995) 725.; E. D’Hoker, S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 605; E. D’Hoker, Nucl. Phys. B 451 (1995) 725.
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.