×
Poinsot, T. J.; Lele, S. K.

Boundary conditions for direct simulations of compressible viscous flows. (English) Zbl 0766.76084

J. Comput. Phys. 101, No. 1, 104-129 (1992).
Authors’ abstract: Procedures to define boundary conditions for Navier- Stokes equations are discussed. A new formulation using characteristic wave relations through boundaries is derived for the Euler equations and generalized to the Navier-Stokes equations. The emphasis is on deriving boundary conditions compatible with modern non-dissipative algorithms used for direct simulations of turbulent flows. These methods have very low dispersion errors and require precise boundary conditions to avoid numerical instabilities and to control spurious wave reflections at the computational boundaries.
The present formulation is an attempt to provide such conditions. Reflecting and non-reflecting boundary condition treatments are presented. Examples of practical implementations for inlet and outlet boundaries as well as slip and no-slip walls are presented. The method applies to subsonic and supersonic flows. It is compared with a reference method based on extrapolation and partial use of Riemann invariants. Test cases described include a ducted shear layer, vortices propagating through boundaries, and Poiseuille flow. Although no mathematical proof of well-posedness is given, the method used the correct number of boundary conditions required for well-posedness of the Navier-Stokes equations and the examples reveal that it provides a significant improvement over the reference method.
Reviewer: B.S.Bhatt (St.Augustine)

Cited in 5 Reviews
Cited in 516 Documents

MSC:

76N10 Existence, uniqueness, and regularity theory for compressible fluids and gas dynamics
76M99 Basic methods in fluid mechanics

Keywords:

reflecting and non-reflecting boundary conditions; Navier-Stokes equations; characteristic wave relations; Euler equations; non- dissipative algorithms; turbulent flows; Riemann invariants; ducted shear layer; vortices; Poiseuille flow
Cite Review PDF
Full Text: DOI
OA License

References:

[1] Thompson, K. W., J. Comput. Phys., 68, 1 (1987) · Zbl 0619.76089
[3] Yu, K.; Lee, S.; Trouve, A.; Stewart, H.; Daily, J., AIAA Paper 87-1871 (1987), (unpublished)
[4] Poinsot, T.; Trouve, A.; Veynante, D.; Candel, S.; Esposito, E., J. Fluid Mech., 177, 4, 265 (1986)
[5] Sterling, J. D.; Zukoski, E. E., AIAA Paper 87-0220 (1987), (unpublished)
[6] Menon, S.; Jou, W.-H., AIAA Paper 87-1421 (1987), (unpublished)
[7] Kailasanath, K.; Gardner, J.; Boris, J.-P.; Oran, E., Naval Research Lab. Memo, Report 5832 (1986), (unpublished)
[8] Kreiss, H.-O., Commun. Pure Appl. Math., 23, 277 (1970) · Zbl 0193.06902
[9] Higdon, R. L., SIAM Rev., 28, 177 (1986) · Zbl 0603.35061
[10] Engquist, B.; Majda, A., Math. Comput., 31, 629 (1977) · Zbl 0367.65051
[11] Gustafsson, B.; Oliger, J., Math. Comput., 26, 649 (1982)
[12] Gustafsson, B.; Sundström, A., SIAM J. Appl. Math., 35, 2, 343 (1978) · Zbl 0389.76050
[13] Williams, F. A., Combustion Theory (1985), Benjamin/Cummings: Benjamin/Cummings Menlo, CA/Reading, MA
[14] Rudy, D. H.; Strikwerda, J. C., J. Comput. Phys., 36, 55 (1980) · Zbl 0425.76045
[15] Rudy, D. H.; Strikwerda, J. C., Comput. Fluids, 9, 327 (1981)
[16] Moretti, G., (Proceedings, Symposium on Numerical Boundary Condition Procedures. Proceedings, Symposium on Numerical Boundary Condition Procedures, NASA Ames Symposium CP-2201 (1981)), 73
[17] Yee, H. C., NASA Tech. Memo 81265 (1981)
[18] Hedstrom, G. W., J. Comput. Phys., 30, 222 (1979) · Zbl 0397.35043
[19] Bayliss, A.; Turkel, E., (Proceedings, Symposium on Numerical Boundary Condition Procedures. Proceedings, Symposium on Numerical Boundary Condition Procedures, NASA Ames Symposium CP-2201 (1981)), 1
[20] Bechert, D.; Stahl, B., J. Fluid Mech., 186, 63 (1988) · Zbl 0643.76040
[21] Ho, C. M.; Nosseir, N., J. Fluid Mech., 105, 119 (1981)
[22] Tang, T.; Rockwell, D., J. Fluid Mech., 126, 187 (1983)
[23] Poinsot, T.; Candel, S., Combust. Sci. Technol., 61, 121 (1988)
[24] Buell, J.; Huerre, P., (Proceedings, 1988 Summer Program, Report CTR-888 (1988), Stanford University), 19
[25] Gresho, P.; Sani, R., Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 7, 1111 (1987) · Zbl 0644.76025
[26] Grinstein, F. F.; Oran, E. S.; Boris, J. P., AIAA J., 25, 1, 92 (1987)
[27] Jameson, A.; Baker, T. J., AIAA Paper 84-0093 (1984), (unpublished)
[28] Oliger, J.; Sundström, A., SIAM J. Appl. Math., 35, 419 (1978) · Zbl 0397.35067
[29] Dutt, P., SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 25, 2, 245 (1988) · Zbl 0701.76032
[30] Vichnevetsky, R.; Pariser, E. C., Numer. Methods Partial Diff. Eqs., 2, 1 (1986) · Zbl 0624.65096
[31] Vichnevetsky, R., J. Comput. Phys., 63, 268 (1986) · Zbl 0612.65050
[32] Strikwerda, J. C., Commun. Pure Appl. Math., 30, 797 (1977) · Zbl 0351.35051
[33] Vichnevetsky, R.; Bowles, J. B., Fourier Analysis of Numerical Approximations of Hyperbolic Equations (1982), SIAM: SIAM Philadelphia · Zbl 0495.65041
[34] Keller, J. O.; Givoli, D., J. Comput. Phys., 82, 1, 172 (1989) · Zbl 0671.65094
[35] Schlichting, H., Boundary Layer Theory, ((1987), McGraw-Hill: McGraw-Hill New York), 281 · Zbl 0099.20603
[36] Hagstrom, T.; Hariharan, S. I., Math. Comput., 51, 581 (1988) · Zbl 0699.76083
[37] Liu, T. P., Commun. Pure Appl. Math., 39, 565 (1986) · Zbl 0617.76069
[38] Poinsot, T.; Lele, S., (Center for Turbulence Research Report 102 (1989), Stanford University), (unpublished)
[39] Rudy, D. H., ASME FED, Appl. Parallel Process. Fluid Mech., 47, 75 (1987)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.