Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Payability

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 13:26, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Payability (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable financial company. Reads like promotional content citing business services. Source 1 is a blog post. Source 2 there is no coverage, trivial. Source 3 is a founder interview on a site you can submit to. It's not verified coverage by any means. Source 4 is dead/not found. Source 5 is a Youtube video. Source 6 is dead/not found. Source 7 is about one of the company's products, lacks WP:CORPDEPTH. Source 8 is mostly about the founder with a trivial mention towards the bottom of the page. Source 9 is a link to the founder's Crunchbase profile. Source 10 is trivial. I see nothing else that would constitute this company receiving a Wikipedia page. Megtetg34 (talk) 03:14, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per the nom's excellent source analysis and an overall lack of notability. ThadeusOfNazereth^{Talk to Me!} 03:39, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:17, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:17, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:17, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:17, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: As per nom rationale and source analysis by Megtetg34. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 15:59, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Good work by Megtetg34 on analyzing the references. Topic fails WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 20:58, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.