Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hotjar (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 12:58, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hotjar

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An article on this topic was speedily deleted under G11 and subsequently this version was created. The talk page sets out concerns with the use of sources, which are essentially passing mentions and interviews with the founder, stitched together to give the appearance of a substantive whole. Reviewed by Jikaoli Kol and recently unreviewed whin their UPE was discovered, it lacks in depth coverage by reliable sources and so fails WP:NCORP. Mccapra (talk) 05:11, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 05:11, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 05:11, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 05:11, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I can definitely see why it was deleted under G11. Envysan (talk) 06:29, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - sources do not appear to constitute significant coverage, rather, as the nominator says, passing mentions. I doubt this company meets NCORP. ƒirefly ( t · c ) 12:49, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: An article describing a company going about its business. There are some brief mentions of this among other tools, such as this, but I do not see the coverageneeded to demonstrate attained notability. AllyD (talk) 11:44, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Topic lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. Northern Escapee (talk) 09:36, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.