Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ground Control Ltd

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 22:50, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ground Control Ltd

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not assert notability. Material online is self-published, passing mentions, or marketing stuff regarding fundraising. As far as I can see, it's a wholly unremarkable landscaping company. Matt Deres (talk) 01:46, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Matt Deres (talk) 01:46, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Matt Deres (talk) 01:46, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 01:58, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note it should not directly affect the outcome, but the user who created this article was pretty clearly their Communications Manager at the time, and was therefore operating with a COI and edited for pay without disclosure. Matt Deres (talk) 03:17, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 03:09, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:44, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete None of the references meet the criteria for establishing notability, they're all "echo chamber" references, relying entirely on information provided by the company or affiliated sources. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND sections of WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 11:51, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.