Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Affliction Networks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — The Earwig (talk) 00:52, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Affliction Networks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG Jenyire2 20:05, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Jenyire2 20:05, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:15, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:15, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:16, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Zero WP:VG/RS hits; article currently only uses primary sources; most likely advertising. IceWelder [✉] 20:22, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Too soon, run of the mill, GNG fail. HᴇʀᴘᴇᴛᴏGᴇɴᴇꜱɪꜱ (talk) 21:40, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails in passing WP:BASIC. Hulatam (talk) 12:40, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - this company does not have multiple reliable sources addressing it directly and in detail, it therefore fails WP:NCORP Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:41, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: Please read the talk page before making your votes. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by LoggingOnto (talk • contribs) 16:21, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've checked the sources and my stance is still 'delete'. Please read WP:SIRS very carefully. Not one of the sources shows significant coverage addressing the subject of the article directly and in depth. Also read WP:RS and see that PC Gaming Wiki, MMO13 and Bang Howdy Wiki are not reliable sources at all. Being listed on Steam is not a sign of notability as they will take games from any developer. Calling a company notable because they have a game listed on Steam would be like calling a musician notable because they have a video on YouTube.... Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:32, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.