User talk:Andrevan

This is a Wikipedia user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Andrevan.

Andre🚐's Talk ☎️ Page Archive 📇 Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65
☕ Threads archived by ClueBot III after 72h ☕

Contentious topics awareness

This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as contentious topics: post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people Eastern Europe or the Balkans gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them the Arab–Israeli conflict abortion climate change articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles pseudoscience and fringe science the intersection of race/ethnicity and human abilities and behaviour governmental regulation of firearm ownership; the social, historical and political context of such regulation; and the people and organizations associated with these issues COVID-19, broadly construed complementary and alternative medicine He should not be given alerts for those areas.

Beware! This user's talk page is monitored by talk page watchers. Some of them even talk back.

Has this user made a silly mistake? Click on the trout to notify him!

This is my talk page. You can start a new thread by clicking here.

Andrevan is out of town and may not respond to queries.

Hello! You reverted some edits that added a lot of unencyclopedic junk back into articles. There's a broader discussion about this going on at both the linguistics wikiproject and the talk page of Great ape language. Feel free to join in, but notice that a lot of the material you added back in was 100% uncited and treated the personal communications of apes signing as credible beyond their acceptance by experts. Warrenᚋᚐᚊᚔ 19:12, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm participating in the discussion, so I'm not sure why you notified me of it. And this edit [1] which I reverted was clearly sourced, so your statement here is incorrect. Andre🚐 19:13, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm referring to this revert, which was unsourced and unencyclopedic. Also, as to the why I pinged you, I'm afraid it's because your full screen name showed up in my notifications and I didn't map it to the one you use in your signature. Apologies. Warrenᚋᚐᚊᚔ 19:26, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I'll leave that one, then, as you are right that koko.org isn't the best source. Andre🚐 19:28, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey!

I have to admit that my biggest contribution isn't to the pages of Wikipedia but my donations, which are often. My other? The Web Archive (Wayback Machine).

Google should fund Wikipedia. It's nuts! There must be somebody who will finance Wikpeida into the green.

I'm less worried about Wiki. But the Wayback machine got sporry for a while and that is where all of my Web content exists.

I remind you that I am proficient in six languages, but am best at Slavic languages such as Czech and Hungarian. Charles McRobert (talk) 15:11, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Google does fund Wikipedia: Relationship between Google and Wikipedia. Happy editing! Andre🚐 18:00, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]