Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 May 22

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Template:PM/Line A–F

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. czar 01:19, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, less-detailed versions of {{Porto Metro A}}{{Porto Metro F}}, created in an obsolete format by a "one and done" editor (possibly a sockpuppet of Pumpie?). AlgaeGraphix (talk) 23:34, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. czar 01:12, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This template doesn't seem particularly useful. It's only used on two pages: Breast-shaped hill and Slippery dick. I think most readers already realize that a) those pages' names are sort of funny, b) those are the articles' real titles and not a joke, and c) those pages will experience more vandalism than average, so I don't really see what purpose this template serves. Might even encourage vandalism by pointing out the silliness of the name. SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 22:05, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 May 30. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert (talk) 13:22, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 May 30. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert (talk) 13:23, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Locostyles. czar 01:15, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Steam locomotive exhaust systems with Template:Locostyles.
As a section within the locomotive styles and designs template. PPEMES (talk) 10:25, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. PPEMES (talk) 11:49, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).