Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 October 27

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

October 27

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. For the record, the template is unused. (non-admin closure) BethNaught (talk) 08:22, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No source given for any of the statements in the template, so there is no way to verify that the information is correct. Although it says that "anyone may view, copy or distribute" the material, it doesn't say that anyone may modify the material. Stefan2 (talk) 22:08, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: It's not useful as a license tag (New Jersey public-records laws only permit verbatim copying, so it's not a free content license, and we've already got plenty of tags for non-free content), and it has the potential to mislead users. --Carnildo (talk) 01:02, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

US miniseries decade templates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relist to Nov 11. Primefac (talk) 06:31, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The templates seem to be an arbitrary aggregation of content best suited to categorical presentation. I don't understand why a template is necessary for this subject.TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 20:46, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 02:39, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox with just one link. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 14:41, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 02:34, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not used. "This template creates a table of video game genres". Seems like a work-in-progress, abandoned long ago. Soetermans. T / C 14:18, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relist to Nov 11Primefac (talk) 06:29, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template's subject is a video game genre, too narrow for a navbox. There's already {{Multiplayer online games}}. Template is mainly used on video game articles, failing WP:NAVBOX. Soetermans. T / C 14:10, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relist at Nov 4; adding note about the Wayback machine. Primefac (talk) 02:29, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The website this is used to link to (http://www.fixedgearfever.com/) is permanently down and it doesn't look like it's coming back. BaldBoris 13:14, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 02:18, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

All the links are to the same article, so this does not function as a navigational aid. Rob Sinden (talk) 09:50, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 02:42, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 02:13, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

provides no useful navigation. Frietjes (talk) 16:51, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 02:42, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 02:09, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WP:EXISTING -- one article that does not exist. The team has only made one (1) bowl game, and the team is defunct as of 1991. Also fails WP:NAVBOX No. 4: "There should be a Wikipedia article on the subject of the template" Corkythehornetfan 02:28, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).