Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 July 8

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. I guess the Commons deletion means we keep it here?  Sandstein  07:09, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:SFB Game logo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Coin945 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

There is a Commons file of the same name and subject under this title. Not convinced that it might be copyrightable in the UK. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:04, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as duplicate on Commons. Waiting per below comment. Lordtobi (✉) 14:31, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. I've nominated the Commons file for deletion. The result of that discussion should determine the result of this one. ℯxplicit 03:04, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment The image was deleted on Commons. Pppery 14:29, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2017 July 20.  Sandstein  07:09, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:James Bond cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:David Bowie Music Icons.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:Hornby cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. There's no actual basis for the assertion that this official portrait of the French president is PD, and it has been deleted repeatedly at Commons as copyvio.  Sandstein  07:12, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Emmanuel-Macron.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Amin (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

According to Commons:Copyright rules by territory/France The rules for protection of works by the government are somewhat fuzzy, and one should assume by default that anything from a government entity is copyrighted., no reason is given why this "official item legally exempt from copyright in its country of origin". The website has a copyright notice. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 12:18, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The copyright is owned by the photographer. But what about fair use?Zigzig20s (talk) 13:32, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is no evidence this is freely licensed and there are plenty of freely licensed images of Macron on the commons, such as all these 19 images, so a it would fail WP:NFCC#1. ww2censor (talk) 13:43, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• FWIW the legal mentions of the presidency website says that the photographs are copyrighted (Toutes les photographies sont protégées par le droit d'auteur et le droit à l'image). I am not sure if that covers the official photograph, but still. Tigraan^{Click here to contact me} 17:11, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The website also says Toute autre utilisation doit faire l'objet d'une autorisation sollicitée directement auprès de la Présidence de la République à l'adresse photographes@elysee.fr., which means that if someone is willing to email photographes@elysee.fr then we might be able to get the image released under a suitable license. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 17:29, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The guys from fr-wp seem to be working on it via Twitter contact with the photographer, but the formal agreement has not arrived yet. Tigraan^{Click here to contact me} 18:48, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am the uploader of the file, and I believe I made an error in judging the license. As I thought it was an official portrait released by the French government, I more or less 'assumed' it was published in the free domain. If we want to play by the rules, we sadly have to delete this file. Alternatively, we could pause its deletion for a couple more days, to see if guys on French Wikipedia can convince the copyright owner to publish the work in the free domain. Amin (Talk) 00:28, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. As a derivative work of a PD image with additions that do not qualify for copyright. The image description page will need to be changed accordingly, or the file moved to Commons.  Sandstein  07:14, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Antietam battle 2012 U.S. stamp.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by TheVirginiaHistorian (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

• Likely non-free US stamp, if the added text and border are copyrightable (The image depicted by the stamp is PD). If non-free, the NFUR in Special:Permalink/600148176 needs to be evaluated and used. AntiCompositeNumber (Ring me) 15:13, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• The subject was discussed at the time of uploading, I believe that it was Masem held that a painting out of copyright cannot be copyrighted by merely adding a border and pricing the stamp. The same holds for others in the series. TheVirginiaHistorian (talk) 19:20, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I believe this is the main section of the 3-year old discussion you are referring too. ww2censor (talk) 22:01, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as PD: Perhaps it is best to show that the stamp is freely licenced because it is merely an old painting with a small amount of non-copyrightable text added. The uploader, or someone else, can easily convert the details to reflect the facts and maybe should already have done so. ww2censor (talk) 15:32, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Antietam

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:06, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:AFL sought Norwood The Canberra Times Friday 10 August 1990.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Thejoebloggsblog (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Non-free news media not specifically discussed in article – Train2104 (t • c) 09:29, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete – fails WP:NFCC#8. Flickerd (talk) 08:50, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:06, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Goudarz Sadeghi.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by G.sadeghi (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unused selfie, years before the selfie-stick which makes the claims of authorship non-credible. Cabayi (talk) 10:52, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:06, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Adeswa Josh 2016.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Pastorflex (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Probable copyvio, slightly smaller version here – Train2104 (t • c) 16:18, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:06, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Elias formal.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Eliasgh (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

unused, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 20:59, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - just self promotion. Cabayi (talk) 23:39, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.