Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 February 10

< February 9	February 11 >

February 10

File:Copia de Imagen009.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:07, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unencylopedic, low quality photo of a long-inactive user (April 2008). No foreseeable use. — This, that, and the other (talk) 08:44, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per nom. Inactive user. Reh man 10:31, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lyndon LaRouche, circa 1930.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:07, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Much as this is a nice image that looks good in the article, it is simply a photo that adds little or no understanding of the article's subject matter. Mr LaRouche was a boy and went to school - hardly matters that require a non-free image to illustrate. While probably fair use in most contexts, it's use here does not significantly increase reader's understanding and the image does not pass WP:NFCC#8. Peripitus (Talk) 10:55, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose deletion. It's hard to see how this doesn't fit the fair-use criteria. Almost all the sources who write about LaRouche are extremely critical of him. The only way to present material from appropriate sources that isn't uniformly critical is to supply biographical material from his younger years that helps the reader understand his background and serves to humanize him. This image of him as a child is being used for that purpose.
The section it's used in discusses how miserable he was in third grade because he was forced to sit at the back of the class and had no glasses, but couldn't see anything because he had poor eyesight. The image is exactly from that period, and it shows him standing at the back of the class without glasses. It's from 1930; LaRouche himself has made it available in an autobiography that he's published online; it has no monetary value; and it's very poor quality. There's no realistic possibility of obtaining a release, because the author is unknown and almost certainly dead. If this kind of image doesn't fit our fair-use criteria, it's becoming increasingly hard to see what does. SlimVirgin ^{TALK|CONTRIBS} 22:02, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The argument that the image legitimately serves to "humanize" him is totally beyond the pale. The facts that Slimvirgin mentions can easily be understood from text alone: he was a kid who had to sit at the back of the class. He had bad feelings about it. The image tells me no more about this than the text does – in fact, it tells me much much less than the text, because it can't tell me anything about the kid's feelings. The factual information value of the image is thus zero. What Slimvirgin seems to be aiming at is not the information value, but the benefit of "driving the point home" through the emotional appeal of the image. But NFC justifications deal in information value, not emotional value. Besides, the emotional agenda expressed here is also quite problematic in terms of NPOV: we don't empoly subliminal emotional messages insinuated through image use in order to strengthen or weaken this or that POV position, negative or positive or otherwise. Fut.Perf. ☼ 13:29, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's important when writing about a living person that we balance the article to some extent. The difficulty when writing about LaRouche is that the reliable sources are uninformly negative. It's therefore important to build up something from his early years to humanize him. Why this image would be a problem in that regard is a mystery to me, because it's clearly of poor quality, of no monetary value, and there's no chance of getting a release. Should the fair-use policy, like all our other policies, not be applied with common sense? SlimVirgin ^{TALK|CONTRIBS} 01:37, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If the sources are uniformly negative, then the article should reflect that, and not raise its own counterposition cooked up by Wikipedia editors. (I think I hardly need to cite the policies for that, do I?) But in any case, if you think you can build a legitimate position "humanizing" him, do it openly and honestly, through well-cited text. Don't misuse images for that, and certainly not non-free images. Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:06, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't answer my question, and I meant it sincerely, not rhetorically. Are the image and non-free-content policies not supposed to be applied with common sense, like the rest of our policies? SlimVirgin ^{TALK|CONTRIBS} 16:53, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What a silly leading question. Of course they are. But the whole thrust of your argument doesn't strike me as common sense at all. Let's just imagine where this would lead us, if we accepted subliminal emotional POV messages employed to bolster up a certain POV perspective as legitimate arguments for non-free image rationales. In every article about a military conflict, users who are concerned that the performance of one side or the other is being unfairly undervalued will be insisting on including a non-free image with fierce-looking soldiers to underline every passage in the article where it says something about their fighting particularly valiantly (or not). In every article about a controversial authoritarian politician, users who are concerned that the article is being turned into an uncritical puff piece will seek to underline every passage that contains political criticism of him with a non-free image showing him making a particularly grim face during a speech, while their opponents will be pressing for images that show him smiling and kissing babies. In every article about a controversial theatrical work, people will insist on showing non-free images of people applauding (or hissing) its premiere. This is simply not a line of thought we ought to allow. Fut.Perf. ☼ 17:24, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FP, where does this aggression and extremism come from suddenly? It's not a "silly" question at all to ask whether we should apply the image policies with common sense. This is an image taken over 80 years ago. It has no monetary value. It is a photograph of a BLP subject as a child. He has made it available in a self-published book. We don't know the name of the author so we can't obtain a release, and he's probably dead anyway. There is zero possiblity of a copyright complaint, and if one were to arrive, all we'd have to do is remove the image. Therefore, there is no reason not to host it, none at all.

If I were to go through Wikipedia and remove everything that didn't conform 100 percent to V and NOR, the place would be decimated. There are discussions going on around the place about how we can attract new editors, more mature editors, more women editors, and one of the issues being raised as off-putting is our incredible over-focus on detail. No other publication would think twice before using this image on copyright grounds. SlimVirgin ^{TALK|CONTRIBS} 05:26, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but every single sentence of the above is irrelevant here. Please stick to the NFCC argument. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:24, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The image is an irreplacable citation for the facts stated in the article. Anarchangel (talk) 06:15, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No, quite obviously it is not a "citation". The facts stated in the article are sourced to a book, and that's as it should be. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:53, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In hindsight, I would have used "citation" in quotes. However, I disagree with your assertion that images cannot be used to verify statements made in articles. Anarchangel (talk) 06:33, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

But it isn't being used to verify a statement. The image doesn't "verify" the fact that he was myopic, nor that he had bad feelings about sitting at the back of the class, nor even that he always did sit at the back of the class, nor even that it is him in the picture in the first place. All of these facts are not really visible to the outside observer in the image. All of them are verified exclusively by the sourced text. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:27, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NFCC#1. A free image could be obtained from Mr. LaRouche or his organization. Kelly ^hi! 01:59, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That wouldn't be possible. SlimVirgin ^{TALK|CONTRIBS} 16:53, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom - does not significantly increase readers' understanding of article. Also, has LaRouche's organization been contacted about releasing an image under a free license? I imagine that there are photos of LaRouche as a child taken by relatives that could be released under free licenses. (If this article's editors believe a childhood photo is so important, they can do the legwork to secure a free one.) Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:33, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Senator Obama in Espanola (2008).png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:07, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Likely copyright violation; appears to be a photo of a photo. Source information is inadequate to verify permission: source web site no longer exists, so no evidence is available that this is in fact the work of the US Government. 75.226.55.56 (talk) 14:52, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Double.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, copyvio, no description for older image in history. Kelly ^hi! 18:27, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Myhead.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned userphoto. Kelly ^hi! 18:32, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Polystyrene cross-linked with divinylbenzene.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Chemically incorrect. The cross-link is a sigma-bond not the aromatic ring of divinylbenzene, and it links two of the single-chain monomers rather than there being a separate monomer that is polymerized into both chains. This would be a diphenylbutadiene crosslinker, but that's not what the topic of this image is. Corrected image for this topic is File:Poly(styrene-co-divinylbenzene).png whereas image here is not a known compound that I know of. DMacks (talk) 18:32, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:March 05-1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned userphoto. Kelly ^hi! 18:53, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NTS Radar System 1960 W.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:NTS Radar System 1960.jpg Magog the Ogre (talk) 19:19, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Musicdock41.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:57, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Musicdock2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, looks like it could be a copyvio Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:57, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Helge Taksdal.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:00, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Don't waste everyone's time biting the part-timers, is my advice. Previously used on user page by sometime contributor & uploader, deleted by an IP (who, by their edits, is probably the uploader, but may change their mind later). Plenty of time to delete it later. A very striking photo, if you were wondering whether to click on the link or not. Anarchangel (talk) 06:29, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GARSeatEnd.200pxl.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, not that useful an image, very low resolution makes it possible that it was taken from the internet somewhere Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:03, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GARTrestleIn.200pxl.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, not that useful an image, very low resolution makes it possible that it was taken from the internet somewhere Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:04, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ceramicmetalvacuumtube.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low quality Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:05, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HMB-PP.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, superseded by File:HMB-PP.PNG Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:06, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:KBAWNING.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:06, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:STW1975.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, probably PD-ineligible but appears to be the wrong logo for 1975 judging by Nine Network... not sure when this would have been the correct logo. no source to verify. Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:08, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Roclincourt Town Hall.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

photograph of copyrightable monument, no freedom of panorama in france, this may have been erected before 1923 (wwi memorial) but there's no way to know Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:15, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:EricGearhart.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:18, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:FunnyJoke.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, i'm skeptical this is own work Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:19, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Abdur-Rouf-Choudhury.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

clearly not own work, uploader has also tagged books and a professional looking map as "own work" Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:20, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Habiganj.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

unlikely to be own work, uploader has also tagged books and a painted portrait as "own work" Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:21, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DNCD.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:23, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Homecomming.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:23, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:YRR31.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, superseded by vector version Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:23, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MG 5304 - Shoes post-camp hollywood.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:23, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Troxel.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

logo, target article deleted (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Troxel) Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:28, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pink1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, likely copyvio Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:28, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Joints.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:29, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BTQ71965.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned logo, probably creative enough to be copyrightable Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:30, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Raj-O-Mac.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:30, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Fotix.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, target article Fotix.net deleted Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:33, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tommy 2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (other deleted image makes it likely that this is someone named Tommy Crew, but we dont' have an article about anyone with that name... and user made no other contributions), looks like a likely copyvio Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:34, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ralph Lewis HMS Furious.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low quality Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:35, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:WA Police ignore.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Low quality Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:35, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Magodfalls.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low quality (better image at File:Magod Falls Karnataka.JPG) Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:35, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mphilly.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:43, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nalmefene.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, superseded by vector version Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:44, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jonezy.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:44, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dandeacon.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:46, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Melissahippy.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:47, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:RazzTazz.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:47, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Non-mevalonate.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, superseded by File:Non-mevalonate pathway.svg Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:48, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Noscapine.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, superseded by File:Narkotin - Narcotine.svg Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:48, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:My europe.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:48, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nov10s.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

subject Louise Mountbatten reigned 1950-1965, no reason this photo would be PD Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:49, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:My improv.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:51, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PiccoloWave.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned userphoto. Kelly ^hi! 21:05, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:P9280049.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned derivative work. Kelly ^hi! 21:22, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:800px-IPM provinsi Indonesia 2008.svg.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

created from File:IPM provinsi Indonesia 2008.svg and put into another format; unnecessarily redundant. Magog the Ogre (talk) 22:14, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.