Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Untitled 2 EP
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Hodgy Beats. LFaraone 01:20, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Untitled 2 EP (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Mixtapes generally fail WP:NALBUMS and this is no special exclusion to that rule. A random mixtape that received little to no promotion prior to dropping, and has not been covered widely in reliable sources outside of the brief mention of its release. STATic message me! 00:33, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:37, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Fails WP:MUSIC; insufficient coverage to clear GNG. - SummerPhD (talk) 03:57, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Hodgy Beats. A couple of sentences there mentioning his forays into hardcore/nu-metal and the contributions of Lee Spielman, Flying Lotus, The Alchemist and Thelonious Martin there would be appropriate. This was quite widely covered, albeit generally briefly, e.g. SPIN, Exclaim!, FACT in addition to the sources in the article. --Michig (talk) 06:14, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge - to Hodgy Beats per Michig. öBrambleberry of RiverClan 15:44, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Enough coverage in reliable sources [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. Koala15 (talk) 19:24, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- All those sources just cover the release of it, and say basically the same thing. There is not enough information on the mixtape to have its own stand alone article. Definitely worth a merge but should not have its own article. STATic message me! 19:42, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:43, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 17:27, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.