Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Preet Aggarwal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Author requested deletion under G7, but A7 would have worked as well. — The Earwig ^talk 06:28, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Preet Aggarwal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:NBOX (only one fight and no titles) or WP:MMABIO (only one fight and no titles). I did a WP:BEFORE search and could not find any WP:SIGCOV in WP:RS to demonstrate notability. I don't think he passes WP:NAUTHOR either. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:21, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:21, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:21, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:21, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Boxing-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:22, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:22, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:22, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete a non-notable boxer.Donniediamond (talk) 14:34, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Per nom. Fails GNG and related specific notability guidelines. – ².O.^Boxing 14:38, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete under G11 and A7. It's just a spam. RationalPuff (talk) 15:52, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete per nom! Sureee VocalIndia (talk) 16:34, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Apparent autobiography that fails to show he meets any SNG or WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO. With no sources or apparent notability, a speedy delete would have been fine--but we might as well finish the AfD (although it looks like WP:SNOW to me). Papaursa (talk) 20:44, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete per nom. Fails WP:GNG and WP:SNG. No evidence of notability. Ashleyyoursmile! 05:18, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.