Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dying to be There
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Thebandwithnoname#Dying to be There. Due to low participation, anyone can revert and re-nominate if they disagree with this result. (non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 (talk) 23:12, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Dying to be There (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Probably best to merge this album's contents back to the subject's article space as it does not meet WP:V let alone have any qualities that make it notable. Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:19, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:00, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 20:32, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti*Let's talk!* 00:43, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:59, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- If necessary, we can close as no consensus and I can list it as a prod since no keeps have been listed as well. Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:12, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- It can just be redirected. I can't see any indication that that would be controversial. Peter James (talk) 16:40, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.