Talk:Auckland Anniversary Day

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Holidays Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Holidays, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of holidays on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HolidaysWikipedia:WikiProject HolidaysTemplate:WikiProject HolidaysHolidays articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. New Zealand Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Auckland High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Auckland, which aims to improve the coverage of Auckland, New Zealand, on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.AucklandWikipedia:WikiProject AucklandTemplate:WikiProject AucklandWikiProject Auckland articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tug-of-war takes to sea Mathmo ^Talk 07:04, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect the Gazette quote contains at least one transcription error. Nurg (talk) 23:00, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Have added a word and deleted a comma. My source does not show the capitalisation. Schwede66 19:19, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A primary source news article about some ignorant people complaining is hardly relevant. This has had no lasting impact or even any short term impact. Traumnovelle (talk) 20:24, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@IdiotSavant there is no 'campaign' behind changing it. It was a media comment that went no where because it is was silly. Traumnovelle (talk) 03:49, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]