Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 March 27

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 13:16, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused bus template. Gonnym (talk) 12:42, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 13:16, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused category header template. Gonnym (talk) 12:43, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Rlink2 (talk) 21:06, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:43, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

delete or move to WikiProject subpage WP:WikiProject Colorado/WikiProject emblem This appears to be the only existing of such an "emblem" template (from a cursory search of templates called emblem). It looks like it might be a userbox, but WPCOLORADO has several userboxes already. The only current use is at the project page for WikiProject Colorado, which does not indicate what this is to be used for, and neither does the documentation page. Several instances of what could be substitutions, except that they predate the creation of this template, seem to only clutter the project page with a "sidebar" of this emblem in several sections at the very bottom of the project page. Is this supposed to watermark paragraphs? -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 14:38, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 April 5. Primefac (talk) 19:17, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete per author approval Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:50, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use file transclusion template. No need for an image file to be on a separate space for transclusion. Subst this on to the Nim article. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:18, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. plicit 23:38, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:27, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. plicit 23:38, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image map. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:30, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. plicit 23:38, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image map. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:48, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request undeletion of these templates. plicit 23:39, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused templates which contain the same information on Template:Footer World Champions 4 x 100 m Men and Template:Footer World Champions 4 x 400 m Men when editing the templates. Edits have no overall effect on the main templates or vice versa. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:39, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:39, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused sidebar with all article linked already covered by navboxes related to the subject of the article. These include Template:Bavarian princes, Template:Bavarian princesses by marriage, Template:Bavarian princesses by birth, Template:Dukes in Bavaria, and Template:Duchesses in Bavaria. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:05, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).