Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Monjento

Monjento (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

  – A checkuser has completed a check on relevant users in this case, and it is now awaiting administration and close.

• Paperbarkk (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools

Monjento (talk · contribs) is currently partially blocked for edit warring on Remah Naji (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). A new account with first edit [1] has appeared with very similar reasoning to Monjento. Also suspiciously adding "keep" to Mojento's comments at the AfD. [2]. With edit summary Prefaced my comment with keep. LibStar (talk) 03:01, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've already said it's not me. I don't need another account to articulate my point. I don't understand why you're continuing to attack me and use process against me. Monjento (talk) 04:50, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Then you have nothing to worry about if it wasn't you. If it was you, you may receive a lengthy block for using a sock account. LibStar (talk) 04:52, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

• Comment The user is very passionate in the AfD discussion, but seems to be going down a familiar path... We've seen this many, many times in AfD. No harm in investigating, if they've done nothing wrong, we're all good. If they have, well, it will be handled accordingly. Oaktree b (talk) 20:05, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment If CU confirms, I think this user should not be indeffed for the reasons stated at ANI. New editors do dumb things sometimes, and this editor seems here to build an encyclopedia. voorts (talk/contributions) 20:46, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  I agree. They seem to be a productive editor that is (understandably) upset their article is being deleted. Block the sock and move on, though I recommend Monjento own up to it before that happens... C F A 💬 01:03, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•   CheckUser requested - I think it would be a good idea to rule out the possibility that Paperbarkk is a joe-job. Bbb23 (talk) 13:32, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•   Possible, similar geolocation. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 14:46, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]