Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sylvester Renner

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 00:12, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sylvester Renner

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails WP:GNG - I can find no mentions of him in any independent sources. GirthSummit _(blether) 17:25, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:49, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:49, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete neither do I. THE NEW ImmortalWizard(chat) 18:00, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: totally relies on self-published or affiliated sources. No indication of meeting BIO. SITH (talk) 20:12, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete non-notable (no independent sources) --DannyS712 (talk) 02:38, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep article was updated, now it contains at least 5 independent sources including Amazon, Digital Journal, Google Books, etc. FrantisekKorbel (talk) 14:10, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The Amazon links and the Google Books link do nothing but demonstrate that he has written a number of self-published books. The books have received no non-UGC reviews as far as I can tell, and so this does not demonstrate notability. The digital journal site is literally a press release about a project he is involved in - it is neither independent nor reliable. None of this contributes towards notability. GirthSummit _(blether) 15:56, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No independent, reliable sourcing to substantiate notability, offered or to be found. WP:NOTPROMO --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 19:05, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.