Barnstars

edit
  The Exceptional Newcomer Award
In a short amount of time, you have created several important articles on Supreme Court cases, reviewed GA nominations, and had 3 DYKs on the front page. Keep up the good work! —Ute in DC (talk) 23:00, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
  The Original Barnstar
For keeping me busy at DYK with all these exceptional new articles on SCOTUS cases. I get to read lots of articles about birds and fungi, the odd church and plenty of ships at DYK, but good-quality law articles are something of a commodity. Keep it up! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 06:13, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
  The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
For reviewing 5 or more Good article nominations during this past March 2011 GA backlog elimination drive, I hereby award you The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar. Good job! –MuZemike 17:25, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
  The Law Barnstar
I, Verkhovensky, award to Lord Roem this Law Barnstar because your focus on creating Good Articles and your commitment to filling in the missing Supreme Court case articles is a huge benefit not just to Wikipedia's legal coverage, but to Wikipedia as a whole! Verkhovensky (talk) 03:49, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
  The Writer's Barnstar
Thank you for your contributions to the Freedom of speech related article about the Supreme Court of the United States case, United States v. Alvarez. The Wikipedia community recognizes and values your quality improvements to the site. — Cirt (talk) 17:54, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
Thank you Cirt!   --Lord Roem (talk) 17:58, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
  The Editor's Barnstar
Congratulations on getting Washington v. Texas promoted to the Featured Article level. — Richwales (no relation to Jimbo) 00:50, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
  Four Award
Congratulations! You have been awarded the Four Award for your work from beginning to end on Washington v. Texas. TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 23:32, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 23:32, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

DYK Credits

edit

The DYK project (nominate) 02:04, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Materialscientist (talk) 20:16, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for this article Victuallers (talk) 21:01, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:05, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 06:05, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:07, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Materialscientist (talk) 03:57, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 06:03, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:04, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:03, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:03, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:03, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:02, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:03, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

The DYK project (nominate) 06:32, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:02, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

The DYK project (nominate) 00:05, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

The DYK project (nominate) 16:03, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for your article Victuallers (talk) 16:03, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Glad to have been able to help with the review. I didn't "know" about this aspect of U.S. law. It's disturbing... --Orlady (talk) 01:04, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Orlady (talk) 00:08, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Casliber (talk · contribs) 17:05, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

The DYK project (nominate) 16:02, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:02, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Mifter (talk) 00:03, 6 January 2013 (UTC)