Talk:Digital image processing
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
 Archives (Index) |
|
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
editThis article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 August 2020 and 17 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Tyler Kelso.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 20:04, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
editThis article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 6 September 2019 and 12 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Tt1887.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:30, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Sources??
editThe Digital image transformations section contains almost no sources, and appears to be, in many cases, original research. I propose to remove all unsourced examples, unless someone thinks otherwise. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 11:36, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- Everything in the Digital image transformations section through Filtering code examples is fine. Everything from Affine transformations onward should be removed.
- The Medical imaging section is the same and should be removed. It is also misnamed as the only medical imaging technology discussed is x-ray computed tomography. It has been two years since the proposed removal of this content and it's still here. I am not a regular editor but agree that all edits made by the user at 117.221.46.24 should be removed. 131.181.46.65 (talk) 04:37, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
AI-based deblurring techniques need coverage
editThere are a number of AI deblurring techniques available now that need coverage. Some are available through photo editing suites, such as Adobe Lightroom or Adobe Photoshop. Others are stand‑alone applications. Still others are delivered over the web. Names include Luminar Neo and Topaz Sharpen AI. I do not have sufficient technical knowledge to write about these techniques and applications, but would encourage other editors to do so. RobbieIanMorrison (talk) 11:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)