$ \tau=h $ | $ \delta_\infty^u $ | $ \delta_\infty^\varphi $ | $ Ord_\infty $ |
1/20 | 2.915E$ - $03 | 1.330E$ - $03 | * |
1/40 | 8.554E$ - $04 | 3.680E$ - $04 | 1.775 |
1/80 | 2.304E$ - $04 | 9.660E$ - $05 | 1.887 |
1/160 | 5.973E$ - $05 | 2.473E$ - $05 | 1.947 |
We are concerned with the mathematical study of a DCIS model which arises in characterizing the biological development of breast cancer. A salient feature of a DCIS model is the presence of free boundaries for describing the tumor growth which is not known in advance. In this paper, we are particularly interested in the case with general free boundaries which may be asymmetric. We first propose an iterative finite difference method for the forward problem and show that the method is of 2nd order in both space and time. Then we propose to study an inverse problem of recovering the nutrient consumption rate by the incisional biopsy data. We establish the unique identifiability of the inverse problem and develop a novel reconstruction scheme based on a certain integral formulation. Extensive numerical experiments are conducted to corroborate the theoretical findings. Our study opens up a new direction of research in mathematical biology with many potential extensions and developments.
Citation: |
Figure 1. The demonstrations of (a) the normal duct, (b) the atypical hyperplasia and (c) DCIS [16]
Table 1.
The maximum relative errors
$ \tau=h $ | $ \delta_\infty^u $ | $ \delta_\infty^\varphi $ | $ Ord_\infty $ |
1/20 | 2.915E$ - $03 | 1.330E$ - $03 | * |
1/40 | 8.554E$ - $04 | 3.680E$ - $04 | 1.775 |
1/80 | 2.304E$ - $04 | 9.660E$ - $05 | 1.887 |
1/160 | 5.973E$ - $05 | 2.473E$ - $05 | 1.947 |
Table 2.
The maximum relative errors
$ \tau=h $ | $ \delta_\infty^u $ | $ \delta_\infty^\varphi $ | $ Ord_\infty $ |
1/20 | 3.937E$ - $04 | 3.761E$ - $03 | * |
1/40 | 1.289E$ - $04 | 9.382E$ - $04 | 1.750 |
1/80 | 3.937E$ - $05 | 2.342E$ - $04 | 1.872 |
1/160 | 1.136E$ - $05 | 5.854E$ - $05 | 1.925 |
Table 3.
The maximum relative errors
$ \tau=h $ | $ \delta_\infty^u $ | $ \delta_\infty^\varphi $ | $ Ord_\infty $ |
1/20 | 5.442E$ - $02 | 8.278E$ - $03 | * |
1/40 | 8.715E$ - $03 | 2.420E$ - $03 | 1.743 |
1/80 | 2.587E$ - $03 | 6.527E$ - $04 | 1.857 |
1/160 | 7.335E$ - $04 | 1.692E$ - $04 | 1.923 |
Table 4.
The maximum relative errors
$ \tau=h $ | $ \delta_\infty^u $ | $ \delta_\infty^\varphi $ | $ Ord_\infty $ |
1/20 | 1.678E$ - $03 | 1.207E$ - $03 | * |
1/40 | 4.540E$ - $04 | 3.287E$ - $04 | 1.886 |
1/80 | 8.168E$ - $05 | 7.040E$ - $05 | 1.958 |
1/160 | 2.936E$ - $05 | 2.644E$ - $05 | 1.992 |
[1] | H. M. Byrne and M. A. J. Chaplain, Growth of nonnecrotic tumors in the presence and absence of inhibitors, Math. Bios., 130 (1995), 151-181. |
[2] | X. Chen, S. Cui and A. Friedman, A hyperbolic free boundary problem modeling tumor growth: Asymptotic behavior, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 357 (2005), 4771-4804. doi: 10.1090/S0002-9947-05-03784-0. |
[3] | X. Chen and A. Friedman, Free boundary problem for an elliptic-hyperbolic system: An application to tumor growth, SIAM Math. Anal., 35 (2003), 974-986. doi: 10.1137/S0036141002418388. |
[4] | A. Friedman, Free boundary problems in biology, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A, 373 (2015), 20140368, 16 pp. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2014.0368. |
[5] | A. Friedman and F. Reitich, Analysis of a mathematical model for growth of tumors, J. Math. Biol., 38 (1999), 262-284. doi: 10.1007/s002850050149. |
[6] | H. P. Greenspan, Models for the growth of solid tumor by diffusion, Stud. Appl. Math., 52 (1972), 317-340. |
[7] | H. P. Greenspan, On the growth and stability of cell cultures and solid tumors, J. Theor. Biol., 56 (1976), 229-242. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5193(76)80054-9. |
[8] | D. Liu, K. Liu and D. Xu, The existence and numerical method for a free boundary problem modeling the ductal carcinoma in situ, Appl. Math. Lett., 121 (2021), 107378, 8 pp. doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2021.107378. |
[9] | D. Liu, K. Liu, X. Xu and J. Yu, The global existence and numerical method for the free boundary problem of DCIS, Math. Meth. Appl. Sci., 45 (2022), 5908-5929. doi: 10.1002/mma.8146. |
[10] | G. J. Pettet, C. P. Please, M. Tindall and D. McElwain, The migration of cells in multicell tumor spheroids, Bull. Math. Biol., 63 (2001), 231-257. |
[11] | J. P. Ward and J. P. King, Mathematical modeling of avascular-tumor growth, Math. Medi. Biol., 14 (1997), 39-70. |
[12] | Y. Xu, A free boundary problem model of ductal carcinoma in situ, Disc. Cont. Dyna. Syst. Ser. B, 4 (2004), 337-348. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2004.4.337. |
[13] | Y. Xu, A mathematical model of ductal carcinoma in situ and its characteristic patterns, Adv. Anal., (2005), 365-374. |
[14] | Y. Xu, A free boundary problem of diffusion equation with integral condition, Appl. Anal., 85 (2006), 1143-1152. doi: 10.1080/00036810600835243. |
[15] | Y. Xu and R. Gilbert, Some inverse problems raised from a mathematical model of ductal carcinoma in situ, Math. Comp. Mode., 49 (2009), 814-828. doi: 10.1016/j.mcm.2008.02.014. |
[16] | The demonstration of DCIS from the website: https://www.rnceus.com/Breast_in_situ/histology.html. |
The demonstrations of (a) the normal duct, (b) the atypical hyperplasia and (c) DCIS [16]
The schematic illustration of the DCIS model with asymmetric free boundaries
A schematic illustration of the pathological section at
The direct problem of example 1: the approximations of asymmetric free boundaries
The inverse problem of example 1: the reconstructions of consumption rate
The direct problem of example 2: the approximations of asymmetric free boundaries
The inverse problem of example 2: the reconstructions of consumption rate
The direct problem of example 3: the approximations of asymmetric free boundaries
The inverse problem of example 3: the reconstructions of consumption rate
The direct problem of example 4: the approximations of asymmetric free boundaries
The inverse problem of example 4: the reconstructions of consumption rate