Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Betteruser/Archive

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Betteruser

Betteruser (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

09 April 2021

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Betteruser was the sockmaster, and has since been blocked, as has the sock puppet account Bobonagblockdito. The IP editor 112.205.1.155 appears to have started editing frequently and in a similar manner to Betteruser, shortly after the account was blocked in mid-March. Notably, both Betteruser and the IP 112.205.1.155 have made numerous additions to the page Sinophile, and edits about the influence of Chinese philosophy on various European philosophers [1], [2],[3],[4]. Also of note is that all three accounts made extensive additions in a short time to pages related to Chien-Shiung Wu and the Wu experiment. [5],[6],[7],[8]. While 112.201.126.55 hasn't been active for a few weeks, they also seem to have followed similar editing patterns [9], [10], as well as to Sinophile and Jose Diokno, an article frequently edited by Betteruser. Darth Coracle (talk) 02:49, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

15 June 2021

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Same pervasive and poorly sourced additions to pages like Sinophile, images to Jose Diokno, and now also edits to Draft:Lin Xie. Here are some diffs, but there are plenty more: [11], [12], [13], [14], [15]. There's some more discussion at [16]. Darth Coracle (talk) 21:11, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

I see shared POV-pushing, possibly coordinated, but there are some key differences (especially surrounding the use of the minor edit checkbox). Make of that what you will. GeneralNotability (talk) 01:42, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


30 July 2021

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Just a couple of days after 112.205.1.155 (talk · contribs) was blocked for a second time, this new user has appeared to partially restore their edits [17]. The other edit was on this page which has been mostly better user socks since October 2020. Requesting CU for sleepers, also suggest re semi-protecting the pages. CMD (talk) 13:13, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

26 August 2021

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


The most recent SPI on Rocketlaunch81 (talk · contribs) closed on 31 July 2021. Rarionite appeared on 4 August, making a small restoration of an image and caption previously added by Rocketlaunch. After a couple of weeks, they made some more edits including this one again to the Jose Diokno page. This is not a 1:1 text recreation, but is very obviously a restoration of these Rocketlaunch edits. Note for example the sentence on the Mendiola Massacre in the same place, the tweaking of the Arroyo declaration, and the addition of the Calle street in Batangas. There is also this change, which is again a not 1:1 but similar edit to this one. A look at the global contributions shows further the focus on Jose Diokno. CMD (talk) 13:10, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

16 September 2021

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Following the block of the Rarionite (talk · contribs) account, this one emerged with the usual key focus on the Jose Diokno article, alongside edits relating to the Free Legal Assistance Group (see this history which shows the multiple socks including Rocketlaunch81, Synchronize6th, and some IPs). CMD (talk) 14:30, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

18 September 2021

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Potestate (talk · contribs) was just blocked, and now this new account has popped up with the same focus Diokno. Given this is now a few months of repeated sockpuppeting, I would suggest semi-protection would be a good course of action here. CMD (talk) 05:56, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

31 October 2021

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


These are CU-confirmed with each other, and my check follows a notice on ANI about a disruptive IP editor. Please note, however, that Ramonetor is making the same edits to that Free Legal article as Rocketlaunch81, listed in this SPI--but also User:BMirror119, whom RegentsPark blocked as a likely sock of JesusJohnson7, Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JesusJohnson7/Archive. Note also that User:Menninte is marked as a sock of JJ7, but this edit is the same edit Ramonetor made. In other words, I think these two SPIs need to be merged. And good god, how childish all this is. Drmies (talk) 15:27, 31 October 2021 (UTC) Drmies (talk) 15:27, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I checked some of the most prolific socks from both cases, and I'm not seeing any cross-commonality of IP or UA. Nor do I see much commonality in pages edited or timecards. So, my hunch is that while there may well be some mis-categorized socks, I'm not getting the vibe that we should do a wholesale case merge. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:30, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
PS, I left some notes in cu-wiki. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:20, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Drmies Unless you feel strongly about the merge, I'd like to close this as is. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:58, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
RoySmith, I don't--go ahead and do what you think is right, and I thank you for doing all this administrative work. Drmies (talk) 23:56, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

03 November 2021

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Reinstating the edits ([18][19],[20][21]) of Missileworker60 (talk · contribs), who I think was mis-assigned a master due to the standard Betteruser interest in topics like the Free Legal Assistance Group and Commission on Human Rights (Philippines). Either way, someone's sock. CMD (talk) 04:10, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Adding Bonadito, exactly the same. CMD (talk) 17:45, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

This case is being reviewed by Tamzin as part of her training as a clerk. Please allow her to process the entire case without interference. You may pose any questions or concerns either on her talk page or on this page.

  • Yeah, I don't see how this could be anyone other than Betteruser. (Based on stuff like Special:Diff/1036361002, Betteruser definitely seems like the better user to tag Missileworker as; I've adjusted it so Missileworker is double-tagged under both masters.) This clear a pattern of restoring past sock edits word for word is too ducky to ignore, CU evidence or no. Pink clock Awaiting administrative action: Please block both accounts indefinitely as suspected sox. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 01:39, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • information Administrator note  Blocked and tagged. Closing. clpo13(talk) 04:28, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

22 January 2022

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


The latest sock, whose contributions follow the usual focus on the Diokno family and related articles such as the Free Legal Assistance Group and De La Salle University (eg.). Compare for example this old sock edit and this recent edit for the same wording changes. This edit by the original account tracked to this page move. CMD (talk) 00:57, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

27 March 2022

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Same interests, edits to Sinophile [22], De La Salle University [23], Jose Diokno [24], and Diokno related pages [25], [26]. Not sure if any previous socks did this, but this one also wrote a thank you message for themself on their own talk page: [27]. Darth Coracle (talk) 06:04, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

27 June 2022

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Same edit summaries ie. (.), moving articles to include middle names where not necessary: example by previous sock, where there is overlap in teh same article, current sock, in particular please compare the edit summaries of this past sock to the current one, the (.) is very telling. PRAXIDICAE🌈 13:47, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also overlap here, here, here with two past socks, and similar edit summaries (again with the (.)) PRAXIDICAE🌈 13:51, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

05 July 2022

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

See page move here again PRAXIDICAE🌈 12:27, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

06 July 2022

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Timiturner's only edits have been to two pages that have been very recently edited by socks of Betteruser (pages are Chel Diokno and Draft:Carmen I. Diokno). Pretty clear duck. Curbon7 (talk) 16:33, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

06 July 2022

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Found another one. Same edit summary style ([28] [29]), edited articles, and move warring style. Curbon7 (talk) 16:46, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

13 July 2022

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

more attempts to change Claudio Teehankee to Claudio O. Teehankee [30] PRAXIDICAE🌈 21:17, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

27 August 2022

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

On Claudio Teehankee. Newly created account with a symbol eidt summary and complete vandalism on the same overlapping page. Curbon7 (talk) 01:06, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

25 April 2023

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

This diff. Same article that has been previously targeted by BU socks, with the same edit summary ("."). WP:DUCK. Curbon7 (talk) 18:41, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

01 May 2023

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Per contribs. Has edited many of the same articles as BU socks (for example Claudio Teehankee) and has the same edit summary style of a single period. Curbon7 (talk) 20:12, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wow that was a lot more socks than I expected. I've watchlisted several of those articles. Curbon7 (talk) 03:21, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

03 May 2023

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Same edit summary style (".") and interest in same articles (Free Legal Assistance Group). Curbon7 (talk) 12:00, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

08 May 2023

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Within two minutes of creating their account [31], this user made their first mainspace edit to a perennial BU sock target (diff) in which they insert an image uploaded by confirmed BU sock Lobsterslam. Curbon7 (talk) 21:26, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]