Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Big Snog

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. I find FormalDude's contribution the most persuasive, supported by Oaktree. Two relists hasn't yielded much participation so this is the best consensus I can find out of this debate. Daniel (talk) 22:27, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Big Snog

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined prod. Despite the involvement of many notable people, I could not find significant coverage in google news. Even as plain google search of ["Big Snog" telethon -wikipedia] yielded little. Fails GNG. LibStar (talk) 05:42, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and United Kingdom. LibStar (talk) 05:42, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 06:56, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable enough. killer bee  09:28, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Not surprising that there was little to be found online about a 1995 event. After a quick search of newspapers from the time, I found significant coverage here, here, here, and here. There's likely more as I only conducted a brief search. ––FormalDude (talk) 05:12, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 14:47, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Based on the newspaper sources given above, it's notable. Oaktree b (talk) 16:59, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.