Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TNT Sports 4

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:22, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

TNT Sports 4

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability of the article content is sparse and questionable with regards to its merits of being a sole article. I would opt to delete and merge the contents with either TNT Sports (United Kingdom) or ESPN in the United Kingdom as these articles would be more suitable for this content. S. Salim (talk) 01:36, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. S. Salim (talk) 01:36, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and United Kingdom. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:44, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Still a well-active channel, and its past WP:N is not lost at all despite going from its own entity as ESPN to a suite channel with TNT. The sourcing is beyond adequate. Nate • (chatter) 00:21, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Channel has a standalone, GNG-meeting history before being rolled into TNT Sports. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 05:02, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It is the backstory to this channel that makes this article notable although there is an argument to rename it as ESPN UK (or similar). Rillington (talk) 05:23, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep it was a separate, independently notable channel. The fact that it's now been rebranded into the TNT Sports family doesn't take away from the historic notability. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:06, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.