Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Cardona
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus to delete, redirecting or merging could be considered but doesn't require an AFD. W.marsh 23:43, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep:Hackney stop jumping to a solution without all the facts--KingMorpheus 02:32, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 12:38, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, seems not to have done much. The nominator who created this discussion page with "keep" seems to be referring to the unreferenced tag added by One Night In Hackney (talk · contribs) over a month ago; the nomination (afd template) in the article was by 66.252.38.148 (talk · contribs). --Dhartung | Talk 19:40, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I think he was referring to comments made here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Myers MPJ-DK 17:03, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Hm. I'm a little edgy on this one; if he's signed by one of the big feds and appearing on TV, even if it is ECW, then he might squeak through (especially considering the fact they won the televised match - that suggests he'll be around at least for a while). The article does need some more sourcing, though, and whether or not he sticks around is still a question mark. Very weak keep Tony Fox (arf!) 20:27, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Notable with his "graduation" to full time WWE instead of just a developmental contract. MPJ-DK 16:12, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, as the article contains no reliable third party sources which show evidence of notability. Burntsauce 22:33, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, he is now a part of WWE roster as he is wrestling on ECW as I type this.
- Keep He is on the WWE roster, and has nation wide exposure. This is an obvious keep. Kris 02:44, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Both Major Brothers have practically the same career, and they are too similar and there's not much difference between the two. It would be like giving The Highlanders and The Shane Twins each their own article just because they're two different people BBoy 06:33, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No reliable non-trivial sources to speak of, failing WP:LIVING and our attribution policy. RFerreira 08:29, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete He has apparently appeared on the WWE roster, however has not done much yet. Most guys are a flash in the pan there anyway. I say delete until he becomes more notable. Maybe create an article for the tag team and merge. Any thoughts on that? Hellswasteland 18:35, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Major Brothers. That's what has been done with Brian Myers, and that's what needs to be done with this article. One Night In Hackney303 08:17, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, he is on WWE TV for gods sake! Some people are ridiculous when it comes to who they consider non-notable celebrities, this guy deserves a page. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.66.4.88 (talk) 16:22, 11 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]
- Millions of people are on television every day, my friend. We don't have articles for every game show contestant on Wheel of Fortune either, for good reason. The standard for inclusion on Wikipedia is non-trivial third party sources, this article has none. Burntsauce 16:34, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Game show contestant?? You really should think through comparisons before making them. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹Speak 21:32, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect/Merge with Major Brothers for now, and then if/when there is enough info and sourcing for him to have his own page, do it then. There is no question on notability though, he is an athlete competing at the highest level in his profession.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.