Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laura Ellen Howard

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 12:38, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Laura Ellen Howard

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable Irish actress.
One report in a local newspaper does not satisfy WP:GNG, and I can find nothing else.
WP:NACTOR is not satisfied by a minor part in the soap Glenroe and a minor part in Vikings (TV series). BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 10:54, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Ireland. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 10:54, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:20, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Seems to have had bit parts, some over 20 yrs ago. There is simply no sourcing to be found, even on .ie websites. Long way from ACTOR. Oaktree b (talk) 13:28, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Nothing to indicate that WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR are met. Relatively small role (5 episodes over several years?) in Glenroe and limited local coverage of role in (unreleased/independent?) film do not establish notability under either criteria. The subject's apparent role in Vikings isn't covered in any sources that I can find. Seems pretty clear-cut to me... Guliolopez (talk) 12:46, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, and own search - a clear fail on GNG (and NACTOR, and artist provisions if relevant - this oddly-worded short does seem to be using artiste for actor), and it doesn't even really try to assert notability anyway; this is sub-stub. Very clear case. SeoR (talk) 08:43, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as no evidence of notability, Fails NACTOR and GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 16:05, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.