Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kakkat house
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete as A7 by NCurse. Resurgent insurgent 21:46, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable house/settlement. Was prodded but recreated after deletion so I'd call that contested. —dgiestc 06:08, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I was the prodder. No evidence of notability. J Milburn 11:21, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Article is pretty unclear on exactly what it's describing, but as written it doesn't appaear to be encyclopedic and it certainly isn't sourced. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 12:39, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I agree with Starblind, its pretty unclear as to what it is describing, if its deleted as a result of this discussion then re-created again, admins could consider salting it.The Sunshine Man 17:14, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete per A7. No assertion of notability whatsoever. DarkAudit 18:52, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- A7 doesn't apply to places. —dgiestc 18:56, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- It's not a place, it's a name. DarkAudit 19:04, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: It's a house. I removed the original A7 tag. It is NOT a person, group, company or any form of web content. Please re-read WP:CSD#A7. In this case, it doesn't seem to cover enough, but it is our policy. Let's stick to it. J Milburn 19:39, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The way the article is written, it's a family name, not a building. Closest parallel I can give off the top of my head are House Atreides or House Harkonnen from DUNE. DarkAudit 19:54, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: It's a house. I removed the original A7 tag. It is NOT a person, group, company or any form of web content. Please re-read WP:CSD#A7. In this case, it doesn't seem to cover enough, but it is our policy. Let's stick to it. J Milburn 19:39, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- It's not a place, it's a name. DarkAudit 19:04, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- A7 doesn't apply to places. —dgiestc 18:56, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.