Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John McIntyre (copy editor) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. ^Complex/_Rational 14:51, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

John McIntyre (copy editor) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Procedural AfD nomination as the page was PROD'd but was ineligible for such as there was a previous AfD on this page back in 2008. The PROD rationale was: "Doesn't look notable. The sources given are basically his employer, and people trying to sell books." TartarTorte 13:39, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Journalism, and News media. TartarTorte 13:39, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment If this is the same person mentioned here [1], I think he's notable. Oaktree b (talk) 15:20, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kentucky-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:57, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per what I said in the PROD, that Tartar has kindly reproduced here. Dr. Vogel (talk) 09:29, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 14:21, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:57, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep In addition to the article found by @Oaktree b: I also found this in CSM, and these minor articles [2], [3]. He may also meet WP:NAUTHOR as I found at least one scholarly review of his book [4]. BuySomeApples (talk) 21:59, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Keep I think with all the new sources found, the individual is notable. Oaktree b (talk) 04:01, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per above. Incidentally, I arrived at this AfD by way of Bus Plunge. I noticed that this individual had a long-running column in the Baltimore Sun, which alone might or might not not fulfill WP:JOURNALIST (haven't dived in too much), but it certainly adds to the currently established notability. —siroχo 23:21, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.