Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heida Mobeck
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:00, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Heida Mobeck (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unable to find substantial coverage. Perhaps simply WP:TOOSOON Aza24 (talk) 23:35, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Bands and musicians. Aza24 (talk) 23:35, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:39, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:39, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
- Weak Delete, she seems notable by performing a simple Google search but the article only contains 3 references. FatalFit | ✉ | ✓ 15:33, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.