Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gerard Hartmann

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Nomination withdrawn and the only Delete vote has been struck. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:33, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gerard Hartmann

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable physical therapist. The only WP:RS I found are the two listed in the article (http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/northern_ireland/2822341.stm and https://web.archive.org/web/20101006083637/http://www.independent.ie/sport/hurling/shefflin-recovery-absurd-2322902.html), each of which gives him only a passing mention. That's a long way from WP:SIGCOV. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 11:56, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Ireland. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 11:56, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
~~Delete:~~ definitely not notable in his own right just for having worked on a few known athletes. ww2censor (talk) 12:04, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ho-hum, well just about, if BHG is happy that's ok with me. Well done Guliolopez though the sources still mostly focus on his athletes. I'm out. ww2censor (talk) 10:33, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. My own WP:BEFORE has returned a number of news articles (Reuters, Irish Independent, Irish Times, Irish Examiner, etc) which deal with cover the subject as a primary topic. And in some biographical depth. I have added some of these to the article. To my own read, there is more here than passing mentions and notability-by-association.... Guliolopez (talk) 01:22, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn. The sources found by @ Guliolopez seem to me to comfortably meet GNG. Thanks, Guliolopez.
@ww2censor, what do you make of the new sources? --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 08:23, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.